To responsibility question for the promotion of terrorism
( Pp. 113-116)

Despite the political changes in the modern world, the threat of terrorism remains. One of the forms of unlawful dispute resolution is terrorism, which allows obtaining the necessary resources, including in terms of decisions of state authorities. In the context of the stated problem, the process of spreading terrorist ideology, which poses a serious threat to modern peace and security, is of particular importance. Russian criminal law provides for liability for a number of actions related to the spread of terrorist ideology and the maintenance of the practice of using violent methods. The purpose of this article is to analyze the current criminal law governing the process of bringing to justice for the propaganda of terrorism in Russia. The author comes to the conclusion that the current normative provision governing responsibility for this crime is incorrect and needs to be changed in order to increase the effectiveness of counterterrorist activities in Russia. Attention is focused on the need for a significant change in Art. 205.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. It seems promising to supplement the list of qualifying signs of propaganda of terrorism by the commission of this crime against a minor, as well as using the official position. These aggravating circumstances are singled out as the most dangerous signs of the propaganda of terrorism in the modern world, which seems necessary to be necessarily reflected in the Russian criminal legislation.

Khutuev V.A., (2020), TO RESPONSIBILITY QUESTION FOR THE PROMOTION OF TERRORISM. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 113-116.

Aripshev A.M. Formirovanie stoykogo nepriyatiya ideologii terrorizma i neytralizatsiya ugroz, formiruemykh ideyami mezhnatsional noy rozni u molodezhi kak faktor protivodeystviya prestupleniyam ekstremistskoy napravlennosti // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2018. № 1. S. 63-64.
Buraeva L.A. Zarubezhnyy opyt protivodeystviya ekstremizmu i terrorizmu v internet-prostranstve // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2018. № 6. S. 283-285.
Lobach D.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za publichnye prizyvy k osushchestvleniyu terroristicheskoy deyatel nosti ili publichnoe opravdanie terrorizma: problemnye aspekty reglamentatsii v fokuse kriticheskogo analiza // CHernye dyry v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2017. № 5. S. 71-75.
Mashekuasheva M.KH. Problemy i perspektivy protivodeystviya prestupleniyam ekstremistskoy i terroristicheskoy napravlennosti // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2018. № 3. S. 64-66.
Moskalev G.L. Propaganda terrorizma (St. 205.2 UK RF) // Natsional naya bezopasnost / Nota bene. 2018. № 6 (59). S. 79-87.
Nikitienko O.G. Usilenie okhranitel noy funktsii ugolovnogo zakona v protivodeystvii proyavleniyam terrorizma // Pravo.by. 2020. № 1 (63). S. 57-62.
Pomnina S.N., Vakhonina E.B. Osobennosti opredeleniya priznakov ob ektivnoy storony publichnykh prizyvov k osushchestvleniyu terroristicheskoy deyatel nosti, publichnogo opravdaniya terrorizma ili propagandy terrorizma // Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki. 2018. № 3. S. 137-142.
Reshnyak M.G. Publichnye prizyvy k osushchestvleniyu terroristicheskoy deyatel nosti, publichnoe opravdanie terrorizma ili propaganda terrorizma: problemnye osobennosti i puti sovershenstvovaniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel stva // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2020. № 1. S. 116-119.
Rumyantsev N.V., Tarasov M.YU. Formy i metody pravovogo regulirovaniya po obespecheniyu informatsionno-propagandistskogo protivodeystviya ekstremistskoy i terroristicheskoy deyatel nosti: rossiyskiy i zarubezhnyy opyt i praktika // Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki. 2020. № 2. S. 29-35.
CHuklina E.YU. Sudebnaya praktika po ugolovnym delam o prestupleniyakh, predusmotrennykh st. 205.1 i st. 205.2 UK RF (po materialam YUzhnogo okruzhnogo voennogo suda) // Pravo i politika. 2019. № 12. S. 82-93.

terrorism, propaganda of terrorism, counter-terrorism, criminal responsibility, Russian criminal law.