The Category of «Effectiveness of Court Actions» in Russian Legislation on Administrative Proceedings
( Pp. 28-32)

The purpose of the study is to determine the theoretical features of the term «effectiveness of court actions» within the framework of administrative proceedings. The authors also sought to correlate these theories with the legislative norms in force in the Russian Federation. The main methodological approaches traditionally applied in the analysis of procedural and legal categories were used in the study. The discursive method has acquired fundamental significance, allowing to correlate different conceptual perceptions of the category of «efficiency» in modern legal science. The authors also relied on the systemic and formal-logical methods, which contributed to the analysis of legislative provisions in the field of administrative proceedings and law enforcement positions. Conclusion. This article summarizes the theoretical provisions on the problem of establishing the content of the effectiveness of judicial actions. All of them are not in harmony with the current Russian legislation in the field of administrative proceedings. The distinction between the general and special understanding of effectiveness is inappropriate, since this is caused by the specificity of administrative and procedural rules and the purpose of the normative categories analyzed in this article. But the rules on the effectiveness of judicial actions presuppose a possible expansion of the terminological meaning in the plane of the principles of administrative proceedings and procedural-legal abstractions. All of them allow delegating to the courts the authority to interpret the legislation and the factual circumstances of the case.

Gizyatova S. V., Kurochkin A. V. The Category of «Effectiveness of Court Actions» in Russian Legislation on Administrative Proceedings // ECONOMIC PROBLEMS AND LEGAL PRACTICE. 2025. Vol. 21. № 1. P. 28-32. (in Russ.) DOI: 10.33693/2541-8025-2025-21-1-28-32. EDN: PDVWOR

Abdul-Kadyrov Sh.M. Approved forms of organizing the improvement of work efficiency in civil and administrative proceedings. Legality. 2022. No. 6 (1052). pp. 3–6.
Avgustina I.D. The active role of the court in administrative proceedings. Russian judge. 2021. No. 1. pp. 19–25.
Anikeev I.V., Shumov P.V. Efficiency of the trial. Bulletin of Science and Practice. 2019. Vol. 5. No. 6. pp. 425–431.
Anishina V.I. Legal nature of judicial lawmaking: theory and practice // Law and state: theory and practice. 2006. No. 5. pp. 10–16.
Baykova L.I. Judicial practice as a result of analytical activity. Judge. 2022. No. 6 (138). pp. 16–19.
Vasiliev D.S. Productivity and efficiency in the assessment of judicial activity. Law and Politics. 2022. No. 3. pp. 49–79.
Voronov A.A. On the issue of assessing the effectiveness of judicial activity. Innovative science. 2022. No. 7-1. pp. 41–44.
Glodina A.V. Manifestation of the active role of the court in the implementation of the principle of a reasonable time frame for administrative proceedings. Journal of Administrative Procedure. 2019. No. 1. pp. 30–32.
Zaznaev O.I., Garipov R.F. Constitutional and legal problems of identification of individual bodies and officials with branches of state power of the Republic of Tatarstan. Bulletin of Economics, Law and Sociology. 2012. No. 4. pp. 156–159.
Pavlova M.S. The concept of effective justice in the norms of the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation. Russian judge. 2017. No. 8. pp. 40–44.
Panova I.V. Efficiency and fairness of administrative proceedings. Bulletin of the Ural Institute of Economics, Management and Law. 2012. No. 1 (18). pp. 3–31.
Polyakov S.B. Subject of proof in cases on the reasonableness of the term of legal proceedings. Russian Law Journal. 2018. No. 2 (119). pp. 116–129.
Selkova A.A. Understanding the essence of judicial activity within the framework of theories of legal formalism and realism. Ex Jure. 2021. No. 2. pp. 7–21.
Sidorenko M.V. Judicial discretion and judicial activism in the context of the certainty of Russian law. Economy. Entrepreneurship. Environment. 2017. Vol. 4. No. 72. pp. 75–79.
Sklyarenko M.V. Actual execution of court decisions is a basic criterion for the effectiveness of justice. Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2014. No. 6. pp. 146–152.
Spitsyn I.N. Limits of court activity in administrative proceedings. Arbitration and civil procedure. 2022. No. 7. pp. 13–15.
Tutarinova N.N. Independence of justice as a guarantee of the effectiveness of the judicial form of human rights activity. Bulletin of the International Law Institute. 2023. No. 3-4 (84-85). pp. 26–35.

administrative proceedings, administrative process, administrative justice, judicial actions..