Lighter Penalties than Prescribed by Law Enforcement: Can Judicial Discretion Be Restricted?
( Pp. 158-164)

More about authors
Gadzhieva Aisha Ansarovna Cand.Sci.(Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law and State Legal Disciplines, (SAEI HE DSUNE)
Dagestan State University of National Economy
Makhachkala, Russian Federation Karaeva Zukhra Shikhshinatovna Postgraduate student of the Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Dagestan State University, Institute of Law
Dagestan State University of National Economy (SAEI HE DSUNE)
Makhachkala, Russian Federation
Abstract:
Abstract: The purpose of the study is the analyzing and summarizing the main problems which are found in the practice of imposing a sentence milder than provided by law, as well as to find the ways and the means of solving them, synthesis and analysis of the scientific proposals on these issues, substantiation of the correctness of some of them. Therefore, the authors present the results of the studied court decisions on sentencing issues with taking into account the provisions of Article 64 of the Criminal Code and give them a critical assessment. The authors also pay particular attention to the imposition of a punishment that is lenient than prescribed by law for certain types of crimes, and above all the crimes in the field of drug trafficking. Taking into account the high public danger of drug-related crimes it is noted that there is a need to change some judicial approaches of sentencing these types of crime in practice. The opinion of the necessity of imposing the legislative prohibitions on mitigation of the punishment for these types of crime is substantiated.
Conclusions. Based on the results of the research some recommendations ate developed for improving the Article 64 of the Criminal Code, as well as proposals for amending the acts of judicial interpretation of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. It is proposed to limit the discretionary powers of judges, as well as to prohibit the use of exceptional mitigation in individual cases, for example, the simultaneous application of two mitigation rules. The judges should be obligated to give detailed reasons for their decision to admit certain circumstances as extraordinary in the descriptive part of the verdict. The authors of the given article make conclusion about the need to prohibit applications on the provisions of article 64 of the Criminal Code in relation to crimes in the field of illicit drug trafficking, indicating their list in the part 3 of the named article.
How to Cite:
Gadzhieva A.A., Karaeva Z.S., (2023), LIGHTER PENALTIES THAN PRESCRIBED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT: CAN JUDICIAL DISCRETION BE RESTRICTED?. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 3 => 158-164.
Reference list:
Kurts A.V. Should the list of circumstances mitigating punishment be left open / A.V. Kurtz // Criminal law. 2004. - No. 2.- P. 39.
Nechepurenko, A. A. Limitation of judicial discretion when transferring mitigating circumstances to the status of exceptional in accordance with Art. 64 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation / A. A. Nechepurenko, A. E. Kukovyakin // Psychopedagogy in law enforcement agencies. - 2017. - No. 3(70). - P. 20-27.
Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of June 11, 1999 N 40 “On the practice of imposing criminal penalties by courts” \ Consultant Plus Text: electronic. [website]. – URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_23617/ (accessed 03/05/2023).
Rarog A. I., Stepalin V. N. Judicial discretion in sentencing / A.I. Rarog, V.N. Stepanov // State and Law. - 2002. - No. 2. - P. 38-39.
Skripchenko N. Yu. Analysis of law enforcement practice of recognition by courts of circumstances mitigating punishment not specified in the law/ N.Yu. Skripchenko// Russian justice. - 2016. - No. 4. - P. 28.
Smirnov, A. S. Sentencing for a crime below the lowest limit / A. S. Smirnov // Otechestvennaya jurisprudence. - 2017. - No. 3 (17). - P. 65-66.
Umanets, V.S., Komissarenko E.S. Features and ways of improving the appointment of a more lenient sentence and probation / V. S. Umanets, E. S. Komissarenko // Improvement of science today: interdisciplinary aspects: Proceedings of the XLIV All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference, Rostov-on- Don, January 21, 2022. Volume Part 1. - Rostov-on-Don: Southern University (IUBiP); VVM Publishing LLC, 2022. - P. 322-324.
In Russia, increasing deaths from drugs - RBC Text: electronic. [website]. – URL: https://www.rbc.ru/society/09/07/2022/62c82a4e9a7947459362d0d5 (accessed 03/05/2023).
Draft Law No. 209821-8 “On Amendments to Article 64 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation Text: electronic. [website]. – URL: https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/209821-8 (accessed 03/05/2023).
Official statistics of the Office of the Judicial Department of the Russian Federation. Text: electronic. [website]. – URL: htp://www.cdep.ru/userimages/Sudebnaya_statistika_2022/f1-svod-1-2022.xls (accessed 03/05/2023).
Keywords:
imposition of a lenient sentence, exceptional circumstances, rules for imposing a mild sentence, circumstances that diminish public danger, discretionary powers of a judge, a ban on mitigation of punishment..


Related Articles

10. CRIMINAL LAW, PENAL LAW, CRIMINOLOGY (12.00.08) Pages: 427-430 Issue №16988
To the question of the grounds for imposing a sentence more lenient than provided for by law (64 of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation)
below the lowest limit substitution of punishment judicial discretion exceptional circumstances
Show more