The Sign of Illegality in the Structure of the Constitutional Right to Appeal the Actions and Decisions of Officials
( Pp. 40-44)

Annotation. The purpose of this article is to establish the theoretical and normative-legal features of the sign of illegality in different mechanisms for implementing the constitutional right to appeal the actions and decisions of officials under Russian legislation. The authors relied on several methodological approaches popular among legal scholars in the field of constitutional rights issues. In particular, the authors relied on theories of constitutionalization, legal institutionalization and legal formalization of the conditions for appealing against actions and decisions of officials. The systemic and formal-logical methods were also of methodological importance. They allowed analyzing examples from current Russian laws. Conclusion: the authors identified the features of the legal technique that predetermined the content of legislative norms. This is justified by the evolution of regulatory and legal material of different industry affiliations. The authors also focused on the variability of the mechanisms for implementing the constitutional right to appeal the actions and decisions of officials in the industry range. This allowed them to establish the conditions under which substantive and procedural grounds arise for seeking a judicial assessment of the contested actions and decisions.

Gizyatova S. V., Kurochkin A. V. The Sign of Illegality in the Structure of the Constitutional Right to Appeal the Actions and Decisions of Officials // ECONOMIC PROBLEMS AND LEGAL PRACTICE. 2024. Vol. 20. № 6. P. 40-44. (in Russ.) EDN: XVXAZB

Bartsits I.N. Constitutional and legal support for public administration reform. Constitutional and municipal law. 2007. No. 24. pp. 2–10.
Bochkovsky A.F. The right to appeal court decisions in the system of guarantees of the right to judicial protection. Eurasian Advocacy. 2018. No. 2 (33). pp. 49–52.
Dukhanina L.N. Constitutional right of a citizen. Strategy of Russia. 2012. No. 8. pp. 13–16.
Yevtushenko V.I. The right to appeal as a way to protect constitutional rights. Legal Bulletin of the Rostov State University of Economics. 2016. No. 3 (79). pp. 35–40.
Erokhina T.P. On the essence of the right to judicial protection. Law. Legislation. Personality. 2020. No. 1-2 (30-31). pp. 57–67.
Zaznaev O.I. Defects of the forms of government of the CIS countries. Political examination: POLITEX. 2008. Vol. 4. No. 4. pp. 7–17.
Zaznaev O.I. Organization of state power in the Republic of Tatarstan: problems and contradictions. Political examination: POLITEX. 2010. Vol. 6. No. 2. pp. 7–27.
Zaznaev O.I., Garipov R.F. Constitutional and legal problems of identification of individual bodies and officials with branches of state power of the Republic of Tatarstan. Bulletin of Economics, Law and Sociology. 2012. No. 4. pp. 156–159.
Ivanets G.I. Legally significant behavior: analysis of the relationship between lawful and unlawful behavior. Law and state: theory and practice. 2022. No. 8 (212). pp. 36–38.
Karaseva M.V. Constitutional right to appeal in the system of political rights and freedoms. News of higher educational institutions. Jurisprudence. 1986. No. 4. pp. 72–73.
Korovinskikh D.S., Doronina O.N. The system of legal protection of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. State power and local self-government. 2005. No. 5. pp. 3–7.
Kurpas M.V. The right to appeal a court decision as an element of the right to judicial protection. Agrarian and land law. 2015. No. 2 (122). pp. 41–45.
Lazarev V.V. Lawful behavior as an object of legal research. Soviet state and law. 1976. No. 10. pp. 29–37.
Malykhina T.A. On Some Approaches to Understanding the Essence of the Constitutional Right to Judicial Protection. Siberian Legal Bulletin. 2023. No. 2 (101). pp. 101–104.
Matrosov S.N. Constitutional Offense. Law and State: Theory and Practice. 2008. No. 3 (39). pp. 38–40.
Mikhailova E.V. Constitutional and Legal Guarantees of the Right to Judicial Protection and Problems of Their Implementation. Legal State: Theory and Practice. 2023. No. 2 (72). pp. 46–52.
Opaleva A.A., Pavlinov K.A. Lawful Behavior and Offense: Definition Problems. Modern Science. 2024. No. 2. pp. 32–34.
Sedelnikov O.Yu. The right to appeal: benefit or harm? Business in law. 2008. No. 2. pp. 164–166.
Smagina E.S. Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation: Prospects for Strengthening Guarantees for the Implementation of the Constitutional Right to Judicial Protection. Russian Justice. 2022. No. 5. pp. 45–48.
Tomina A.P., Shnitenkov A.A. Legal Nature and Content of the Right to Judicial Protection. The Relationship between the Right to Judicial Protection and the Right to Appeal to Court. Proceedings of the Orenburg Institute (Branch) of the Moscow State Law Academy. 2021. No. 3 (49). pp. 55–62.
Fedunova P.A. The Right to Appeal the Actions (Inactions) of Executive Authorities and Their Officials. Innovations. Science. Education. 2021. No. 48. pp. 734–737.
Frolova N.Yu. Lawful and unlawful behavior as paired legal categories. Law and state: theory and practice. 2010. No. 1 (61). pp. 7–10.
Yuldasheva L.D. Problems of the effectiveness of the mechanism for implementing the constitutional right of citizens to appeal decisions and actions (or inaction) of officials. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University. 2007. No. 9 (87). pp. 33–39.

right to appeal, constitutional right, actions and decisions of officials, mechanism for exercising subjective right..