Methodology of the modern worldview of the past, history and falsification of history
( Pp. 12-15)

The article is about different worldviews by people and states of the past. The methodology of the modern worldview consists in the equally respectful attitude of man to theories (concepts) that explain the past of mankind. The article claims that history is not the past, but recognition, the story of a person about the past: near and distant, very distant past. In history, the main thing is the purpose of study. For the purpose of history, the facts of the past are interpreted. A person transfers the purpose of his life to the past and, according to the logic of the goal, studies the past, reflecting what was found in the record in his story about the past. People have different goals in life, hence humanity does not have one, but several theories (concept) of an explanation of the past. The article distinguishes between the fact of the past (objective) and the fact of history (subjective). The fact of the past is the reality of the past without being explained by man, and the fact of history is the fact explained by man. In the story created by man, the main thing is not a fact, but a creative interpretation of the fact in the logic of his goal. The past is one, and the explanations of it by man are different. Each worldview explanation of the past accuses another worldview explanation of the past in distorting the truth of the past, in its falsification. The official (state) history of any state is written according to its purpose. A change in the state’s goal leads to a «rewriting» of the previous history, creating a new creative history for a new goal. The goal of national stories is the consolidation of citizens to realize the goals of their state. The conceptual history of the state is always perceived by its opponents as falsification of history.

Lichman B.V., (2020), METHODOLOGY OF THE MODERN WORLDVIEW OF THE PAST, HISTORY AND FALSIFICATION OF HISTORY. History and Modern Perspectives, 2 => 12-15.

Gerasimov G.I. Idealisticheskiy vzglyad na istoriyu. //Istoriya i sovremennoe mirovozzrenie. 2019 , №1,
Gumilev L. N. Ot Rusi do Rossii. Ocherki po russkoy istorii 8-11 klassy: Posobie dlya obshcheobrazovatel nykh uchebnykh zavedeniy /Pod red. A. M. Panchenko. M., 1996 i dr.
Ionov I.N. Rossiyskaya tsivilizatsiya, IX - nachalo XX v.: Uchebnaya kn. dlya 10-11 klassov obshcheobrazovatel nykh uchrezhdeniy. M.: Prosveshchenie, 1995.
Kamynin V.D. Mnogokontseptual nost v istoricheskoy nauke i prepodavanie istorii. //Istoriya i sovremennoe mirovozzrenie. 2019. T.1. №4.
Kartashev A.V. Ocherki po istorii russkoy tserkvi. V 2-kh t. M., 2006 i dr.
Ferro Mark: Kak rasskazyvayut istoriyu detyam v raznykh stranakh mira.: Per. s fr. M., 1992.
Munchaev SH. M., Ustinov V. M. Istoriya Rossii. Uchebnik dlya vuzov. M., 1998.
Nefedov S.A. Istoriya Rossii. Faktornyy analiz. V 2 t. M., 2010, 2011 i dr.
Ponamareva E. Fal sifikatsiya istorii kak mirovozzrenie Zapada. Elektronnyy resurs

worldview, past, fact, theory, history, falsification.