Judicial control over the legality in the operation of customs authorities
( Pp. 105-109)
More about authors
Koval Viktoriya D.
aspirantka
Russian customs Academy
Russian customs Academy
Abstract:
Background: the article reveals the concept and essence of judicial control over the observance of legality in the activities of the customs authorities, the results of the analysis of judicial practice in cases on administrative offences, passed by the customs authorities for consideration by the courts. The author of the given categories most frequently discontinued courts cases on administrative offences, the reasons, problems and their solutions when making such decisions by the courts. Materials and methods: the Author were used scientific methods of knowledge: analysis, comparison, legal, modeling, and comparative legal and systemic-structural methods. Results: the Author concluded that the enforcement of the administrative-jurisdictional practice has a number of problems in the consideration of cases on administrative offences, requiring the development and improvement of the current legislation. Conclusion: the task of ensuring legality in administrative and jurisdictional activity of the customs authorities should decide on the basis of improving customs administration, enhancing the role of judicial review, regular interaction between administrative and judicial authorities on the interpretation of the law. Practical value: conclusions and suggestions can be used in the work on improvement of administrative law, in further scientific research on this issue, as well as in the educational process at the law faculties and the faculty of customs Affairs in higher education institutions. Social impacts: are analyzed and problems in administrative and jurisdictional activity of the customs bodies. Originality/value: the article is intended for researchers dealing with the problem of ensuring legality in the activities of public authorities, practitioners, graduate students of higher educational institutions.
How to Cite:
Koval V.D., (2014), JUDICIAL CONTROL OVER THE LEGALITY IN THE OPERATION OF CUSTOMS AUTHORITIES. Business in Law, 6 => 105-109.
Reference list:
Federal nyy konstitutsionnyy zakon ot 21 iyulya 1994g. № 1-FKZ O Konstitutsionnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii (v posledney red. FKZ ot 04.06.2014 № 9-FKZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 1994. 25 iyulya. № 13. St. 1447.
Federal nyy konstitutsionnyy zakon ot 28 aprelya 1995g. № 1-FKZ Ob arbitrazhnykh sudakh v Rossiyskoy Federatsii (v posledney red. FKZ ot 23.06.2014 № 10-FKZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 1995. 1 maya. № 18. St. 1589.
Arbitrazhnyy protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 24 iyulya 2002g. № 95-FZ (v posledney red. FZ ot 28.06.2014 № 186-FZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2002. 29 iyulya. № 30. St.3012.
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30 dekabrya 2001g. № 195-FZ (v posledney red. FZ ot 22.10.2014 № 317-FZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2002. 7 yanvarya. № 1 (ch.1). St.1.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 02 iyunya 2004g. № 10 O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikshikh v sudebnoy praktike pri rassmotrenii del ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh (v posledney red. Postanovleniya Plenuma VAS RF ot 10.11.2011 № 71). // Vestnik VAS RF. № 8. 2004.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 24 marta 2005g. № 5 (v posledney red. Postanovleniya Plenuma VS RF ot 19.12.2013 № 40) O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Rossiyskaya gazeta. № 80. 19.04.2005.
Informatsionno-analiticheskie obzory, podgotovlennye otdelom kontrolya soblyudeniya zakonnosti pri privlechenii k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti YUzhnoy operativnoy tamozhni za 2008-2013 gody.
Vasil ev F. P., Smirnov A. V. Sovremennye osobennosti obespecheniya zakonnosti v podrazdeleniyakh Organov Vnutrennikh Del i ikh regulirovanie // Biznes v zakone. - 2013. - № 2. - S. 164 - 169.
Dolgopyat A.O. Ponyatie i soderzhanie printsipa zakonnosti // Biznes v zakone. - 2009. - № 1. - S. 335-337.
Tkachenko M.V. Sudebnyy kontrol za notarial noy deyatel nost yu // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2011. - № 3. - S. 298-300.
Federal nyy konstitutsionnyy zakon ot 28 aprelya 1995g. № 1-FKZ Ob arbitrazhnykh sudakh v Rossiyskoy Federatsii (v posledney red. FKZ ot 23.06.2014 № 10-FKZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 1995. 1 maya. № 18. St. 1589.
Arbitrazhnyy protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 24 iyulya 2002g. № 95-FZ (v posledney red. FZ ot 28.06.2014 № 186-FZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2002. 29 iyulya. № 30. St.3012.
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30 dekabrya 2001g. № 195-FZ (v posledney red. FZ ot 22.10.2014 № 317-FZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2002. 7 yanvarya. № 1 (ch.1). St.1.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 02 iyunya 2004g. № 10 O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikshikh v sudebnoy praktike pri rassmotrenii del ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh (v posledney red. Postanovleniya Plenuma VAS RF ot 10.11.2011 № 71). // Vestnik VAS RF. № 8. 2004.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 24 marta 2005g. № 5 (v posledney red. Postanovleniya Plenuma VS RF ot 19.12.2013 № 40) O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Rossiyskaya gazeta. № 80. 19.04.2005.
Informatsionno-analiticheskie obzory, podgotovlennye otdelom kontrolya soblyudeniya zakonnosti pri privlechenii k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti YUzhnoy operativnoy tamozhni za 2008-2013 gody.
Vasil ev F. P., Smirnov A. V. Sovremennye osobennosti obespecheniya zakonnosti v podrazdeleniyakh Organov Vnutrennikh Del i ikh regulirovanie // Biznes v zakone. - 2013. - № 2. - S. 164 - 169.
Dolgopyat A.O. Ponyatie i soderzhanie printsipa zakonnosti // Biznes v zakone. - 2009. - № 1. - S. 335-337.
Tkachenko M.V. Sudebnyy kontrol za notarial noy deyatel nost yu // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. - 2011. - № 3. - S. 298-300.
Keywords:
judicial control, illegal decisions of customs authorities, the rule of law, the complaint, action (inaction), administrative offence, the court decision.
