Classification of methods of self-help of civil rights in the United States contract law
( Pp. 88-90)
More about authors
Artemov Ivan I.
aspirant kafedry grazhdanskogo prava i processa
Russian Economic University named after G.V. Plekhanov
Russian Economic University named after G.V. Plekhanov
Abstract:
The article considers the basic mechanisms of self-help of civil rights in a contractual relationship recognized by modern legal doctrine of the United States. Relevance of the article due with the fact that the study of methods of self-help which completely different with the methods Known to Russian law system allows to identify the advantages and disadvantages of such a system and use some of well-functioning for a long time mechanisms for the improvement of the law about self-help in Russia. The material based on a detailed analysis of existing in this area scientific concepts, which allows to highlight the most characteristic for the modern doctrine reasons for the classification of methods of self-help in the United States contract law
How to Cite:
Artemov I.I., (2014), CLASSIFICATION OF METHODS OF SELF-HELP OF CIVIL RIGHTS IN THE UNITED STATES CONTRACT LAW. Business in Law, 6 => 88-90.
Reference list:
Suyunbaev R. Problemy zashchity grazhdanskikh prav // Biznes v zakone. 2009 g. №1. S.280-283.
Uzdimaeva N.I. Pravovaya samozashchita - novyy kompleksnyy institut v sisteme rossiyskogo prava //Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2011. №4. C.23-27.
SHevtsov S.G. Kontseptual nye osnovy ustanovleniya predelov svobodnogo usmotreniya sub ektov grazhdanskikh pravootnosheniy//Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2012. №3. C. 82-86.
Andersen E. A. New Look at Material Breach in the Law of Contracts//U.C. Davis Law Review. 1988. P.1119-1178.
Chesterlin M. Concepts and case analysis in law of contract.N.Y., 1993. 394 p.
Cohen A.B. Reviving Jacob and Youngs, Inc. v. Kent: Material Breach Doctrine Reconsidered.Vol.42. p.232-251.
Corbin A.L., Corbin on contracts. 1960. 1373 p.
Francis C. The Structure of Judicial Administration and the Development of Contract Law in Seventeenth Century England // Columbia Law Review. №35. 1983. P. 111-128
Jaeger W. Williston on contracts: A treatise on the law of contracts. 3rd ed. 1962. 486 p.
Jacob Youngs, Inc. v. Kent // Northeast Reporter Vol. 129. N.Y. 1921. P.881- 895.
Kings Branch 1973 // English Reporter Vol.99. 1478 p.
Kings Branch 1977 // English Reporter Vol.126. P.1523 p.
Taylor S. Self-help in contract law: an exploration and proposal // Wake Forest Law Review. 1998. P. 839-907.
Uzdimaeva N.I. Pravovaya samozashchita - novyy kompleksnyy institut v sisteme rossiyskogo prava //Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2011. №4. C.23-27.
SHevtsov S.G. Kontseptual nye osnovy ustanovleniya predelov svobodnogo usmotreniya sub ektov grazhdanskikh pravootnosheniy//Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2012. №3. C. 82-86.
Andersen E. A. New Look at Material Breach in the Law of Contracts//U.C. Davis Law Review. 1988. P.1119-1178.
Chesterlin M. Concepts and case analysis in law of contract.N.Y., 1993. 394 p.
Cohen A.B. Reviving Jacob and Youngs, Inc. v. Kent: Material Breach Doctrine Reconsidered.Vol.42. p.232-251.
Corbin A.L., Corbin on contracts. 1960. 1373 p.
Francis C. The Structure of Judicial Administration and the Development of Contract Law in Seventeenth Century England // Columbia Law Review. №35. 1983. P. 111-128
Jaeger W. Williston on contracts: A treatise on the law of contracts. 3rd ed. 1962. 486 p.
Jacob Youngs, Inc. v. Kent // Northeast Reporter Vol. 129. N.Y. 1921. P.881- 895.
Kings Branch 1973 // English Reporter Vol.99. 1478 p.
Kings Branch 1977 // English Reporter Vol.126. P.1523 p.
Taylor S. Self-help in contract law: an exploration and proposal // Wake Forest Law Review. 1998. P. 839-907.
Keywords:
Self-defense, the contractual relationship, civil law, contract law, material breach.
