The problem of distinction between the categories «the parties’ autonomy», «the freedom of contract» and «the free exercise» of rights by the parties
( Pp. 94-97)

The purpose of the article is to make a distinction between the principle of parties’ autonomy (which is the principle of international private law) and two general legal principles - the principle of contract freedom and the principle of the free exercise of rights by the parties. Since international private law is an independent branch of Russian law, the principles of contract freedom and of the free exercise of rights by the parties are applicable in its sphere. Besides, international private law possess its own specific category - the principle of parties’ autonomy. The principle of parties’ autonomy is the right of parties to choose the applicable law. The distinction between the principle of parties’ autonomy and the principles of contract freedom and of the free exercise of rights by the parties lies in its legal nature. Conclusion: the principle of parties’ autonomy is the specific category of the international private law, namely of the conflict of laws, whereas the principles of contract freedom and of the free exercise of rights by the parties are generally recognized principles of private law, thus their legal nature lies in the sphere of substantive law

Akimova Y.M., (2014), THE PROBLEM OF DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE CATEGORIES «THE PARTIES’ AUTONOMY», «THE FREEDOM OF CONTRACT» AND «THE FREE EXERCISE» OF RIGHTS BY THE PARTIES. Business in Law, 6 => 94-97.

Alimova YA.O. Printsipy UNIDRUA - kak istochnik budushchey novoy konventsii v sfere dogovornogo prava. Mif ili real nost quot;Biznes v zakone quot;, №3, 2014.
Asoskov A.V. Kollizionnoe regulirovanie dogovornykh obyazatel stv. - M.: Infotropik Media, 2012.
Bekbaev E.Z. Sushchnost prava. Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve, №4, 2014.
Dmitrieva G.K. Negosudarstvennoe regulirovanie v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave/ Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. IV Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya Kutafinskie chteniya . Sbornik tezisov. - M.: OOO Izd-vo Elit , 2012.
Zvekov V.P. Obyazatel stva vsledstvie prichineniya vreda v kollizionnom prave. M., 2007.
Zykin I.S. Razvitie mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava v svete prinyatiya chasti tret ey GK RF. // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2002. № 12.
Grazhdanskoe pravo. Tom 1. Uchebnik. Pod red. A.P. Sergeeva, YU.K. Tolstogo, M.: OOO TK Velbi , 2002.
Grazhdanskoe pravo: V 4 t. Tom 1: Obshchaya chast : Uchebnik 3-e iz- danie, pererabotannoe i dopolnennoe. Pod red. E.A.Sukhanova. M., Volters Kluver, 2008.
Kudashkin V.V. Aktual nye voprosy mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava. - M, Volters Kluver, 2004.
Lunts L.A. Vneshnetorgovaya kuplya-prodazha (kollizionnye voprosy). M., 1972.
Makarov A.N. Osnovnye nachala mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava. M.: OOO Knigodel , 2009.
Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: uchebnik/ Otv. red. G. K. Dmitrieva. 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. M., 2010.
Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo. Uchebnik. Pod red. V.P. Zvekova. M., 2004.
Svezhentseva N.P. Svoboda dogovora kak indikator razvitiya grazhdanskogo zakonodatel stva v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. quot;Biznes v zakone quot;. №1, 2011.
Tolochko O. N. Printsipy mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava. Belorusskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava i mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy. 2001, № 2.
CHubykina E.V. Printsip avtonomii voli storon vo vneshneekonomicheskom dogovore.// quot;Zakonodatel stvo quot;, N 10, oktyabr 2001.
Batiffol H. Aspects philosophiques du droit international prive. Paris; Dalloz, 1956.

private international law, conflict of laws, principles of law, the autonomy of the will, optionality, freedom of contract, civil law.