Judicial procedure of challenging decrees and decisions in cases of administrative offences
( Pp. 122-126)

The article is aimed to analysis of legal order connected with challenging cases of administrative offences under Code RF of administrative offences. The author uses comparative legal research method, studies the legal framework in sphere of regulation the procedure of revision decisions made in cases of administrative offences (legal norms of chapter 30 Code RF of administrative offences and chapter 25 Civil procedure code of RF), considers advantages and disadvantages of provided under Code RF of administrative offences procedure. In particular the article contains analysis such institutions as deposition complaint in the absence of public officer, which draws up a protocol on administrative offence, and notice of the victim about court decision. The author considers problems of participation the public officer, which draws up a protocol on administrative offence, in the legal process connected with challenging cases of administrative offences, and realization the principle of directness as well. As a result of research the author makes conclusion about necessity of unified regulation similar relations arising in sphere of challenging cases of administrative offences and relations connected with challenging authorities’ decisions, actions (inaction). The article can be used for perfection of procedural legislation in the sphere of legal order connected with challenging cases of administrative offences in terms of the reform aimed to preparation of new Unified procedural code

Pavlova M.S., (2014), JUDICIAL PROCEDURE OF CHALLENGING DECREES AND DECISIONS IN CASES OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENCES. Business in Law, 5 => 122-126.

Arbitrazhnyy protsessual nyy kodeks RF ot 24 iyulya 2002 № 95-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 29.07.2002. N 30. st. 3012.
Grazhdanskiy protsessual nyy kodeks RF 14 oktyabrya 2002 g. № 138-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2002. № 46. St. 4532.
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30 dekabrya 2001 g. № 195-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 2002. № 1 (ch. 1). St.1.
Federal nyy zakon ot 23.07.2010 № 171-FZ O vnesenii izmeneniy v Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh i Federal nyy zakon O promyshlennoy bezopasnosti opasnykh proizvodstvennykh ob ektov // quot;Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF quot;, 26.07.2010, N 30, st. 4002.
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 03.04.2007 g. № 336-O-O Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zaprosa Moskovskogo oblastnogo suda o proverke konstitutsionnosti chasti 1 stat i 30.1 Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh .
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF № 346-O-O ot 29.05.2007 g. po delu Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby grazhdanina Kondrashina Andreya Vladimirovicha na narushenie ego konstitutsionnykh prav ryadom polozheniy Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh, a takzhe resheniyami sudov obshchey yurisdiktsii .
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 24.03.2005 g. № 5 O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. № 6. 2005.
Reshenie Koptevskogo rayonnogo suda g. Moskvy ot 24.01.2008. Arkhiv Koptevskogo rayonnogo suda g. Moskvy.
Galagan I.A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost v SSSR (protsessual noe regulirovanie). Voronezh. 1976.
Gorb S.V. O neobkhodimosti vneseniya v KoAP RF polozheniya o vozmozhnosti i poryadke peresmotra postanovleniya po delu ob administrativnom pravonarushenii po novym ili vnov otkryvshimsya obstoyatel stvam // Biznes v zakone. № 2. 2013.
Gros L.A. KoAP RF: ignorirovanie norm grazhdanskogo protsessual nogo prava // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. № 12. 2002.
Kibisskaya T.M. Rassmotrenie mirovymi sud yami del ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk. CHelyabinsk. 2006.
Kodzaev CH.S. Peresmotr postanovleniy po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk. Rostov-na-Donu. 2010.
Koshelkin S.YU. Proizvodstvo po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti dorozhnogo dvizheniya. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk. M. 2009.
Lomakin V.I. Prokuror v proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk. CHelyabinsk. 2006.
Loriya V.A. Sushchestvuet li administrativnaya yustitsiya v sovetskom prave // Pravovedenie. 1970. № 1.
Luparev E.B. Administrativnye pravootnosheniya kak sistemoobrazuyushchiy element publichnykh pravootnosheniy // Biznes v zakone. № 6. 2012.
Moskalenko S.S. Sudoproizvodstvo po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti dorozhnogo dvizheniya. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk. Omsk. 2009.
Pankova O.V. Problemy primeneniya glavy 30 KoAP RF Peresmotr postanovleniy i resheniy po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v sudakh obshchey yurisdiktsii // Administrativnaya otvetstvennost : voprosy teorii i praktiki. Sbornik statey M.: Izd-vo IGiP RAN. 2005.
Solov eva O.M. Proizvodstvo po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: opyt sistemnogo izucheniya. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk. Krasnodar. 2004.
Filippov A.M. Puti obespecheniya edinstva pravovogo prostranstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Biznes v zakone. 2014. № 4.
SHagabutdinov A. Peresmotr vstupivshego v zakonnuyu silu postanovleniya po delu ob administrativnom pravonarushenii // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2003. № 9.
SHergin A.P. Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya. M. 1979.

The RF code on administrative offences, appeal of administrative offences, public relations.