Differentiation of provocation of a crime from partnership institute
( Pp. 89-91)

More about authors
Tishchenko Anatoly V. soiskatel kafedry ugolovnogo prava Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. Sledovatel 3 otdela Sledstvennoy chasti po rassledovaniyu organizovannoy prestupnoy deyatelnosti Glavnogo sledstvennogo upravleniya MVD Rossii po g.Sankt-Peterburgu i Leningradskoy oblasti
the Main investigation department the MIA of Russia in St.-Petersburg and the Leningrad region; St.-Petersburg University of the MIA of Russia
Abstract:
The problems associated with the qualification of complicity in the crime were considered valid and are considered one of the most slozhnorazreshimyh in domestic criminal law. Among the issues associated with the use of criminal law institute of complicity in the investigative and judicial practice, there is an unresolved under Russian criminal law on the delineation of the offense of provocation and incitement to commit a crime as part of the legal institution of criminal complicity in the crime. These problems have long attracted the attention of specialists of criminal law, but no consensus on it has not yet been worked out. Scientific work to consider these problems in the legal literature and periodicals appear very rarely. Therefore, the relevance of the article should not cause doubt. In the article the author, using a set of scientific methods of research, such as comparison, analysis, synthesis, and chastnonauchnogo formal-logical method, solves the problem supplies the concept of "provocation offense" to the legal institution of criminal complicity. On this question the author gives a negative answer. According to the author, the concept of "provocation offense" and "incitement to commit a crime, "when external similarity, differ in the absence of evidence of complicity - the unity of intent and the general thrust of the outcome of the participants provocation. This conclusion is tempting to believe the author of the need to secure a special part of the Criminal Code the concept of "provocation crime" as a separate item. The novelty of the ideas put forward by the author, is seen in the argument about the concept of securing a criminal provocation, separate from the Institute of complicity in the crime. These ideas may well be used in the preparation of textbooks and legal educational institutions, as well as practical guidelines for employees of the preliminary investigation. Further development of these ideas can contribute to the scientific debate, caused the attention of representatives of legal science to the problems articulated above. Results of research conducted by the author of this article, are useful not only in the educational, scientific and theoretical point of view, they also have some practical value. The provisions given in this article are the bodies of preliminary investigation and the courts will be able to more clearly address the issues of qualification of complicity, the introduction of the criminal law rules on provocation offense will help them make fair decisions that will have an overall positive social effect.
How to Cite:
Tishchenko A.V., (2014), DIFFERENTIATION OF PROVOCATION OF A CRIME FROM PARTNERSHIP INSTITUTE. Business in Law, 5 => 89-91.
Reference list:
Kugusheva S.V. Provokatsiya prestupleniya: problemy ugolovno-pravovoy kvalifikatsii. Ugolovnoe pravo. 2005. № 10. S. 25.
Masterkov A.A. Ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie aspekty provokatsionnoy deyatel nosti. Avtoref. dis. k.yu.n. Vladivostok. 2000. S. 9.
Moiseenko M. I. Sub ektivnaya storona posrednichestva pri vzyatochnichestve//Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve, 2014, №1, S. 143-147
Petrukhnov I.D. Nekotorye voprosy kvalifikatsii krazhi, sovershennoy v souchastii// Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve, 2014, №3, S. 170-175
Piontkovskiy A.A. Uchenie o prestuplenii po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. M., 1961. S. 574.
Radachinskiy S. N. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za provokatsiyu vzyatki libo kommercheskogo podkupa. M.; Rostov n/D, 2003. S. 11-14.
Rossiyskaya gazeta, № 6255 (279), 11.12.2013. URL: http://www.rg.ru/ gazeta/2013/12/11 html (data obrashcheniya: 10.03.2014).
Sidorenko E.A. Ob ektivnaya storona sostava prestupleniya, predusmotrennogo st. 291.1 UK RF// Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve, 2014, №2, S. 154-158
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii: tekst s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami na 7 iyulya 2013g. - M.: AST, 2013. stat ya 32, S.15.
Keywords:
Provocation crimes, complicity in the crime, incitement.


Related Articles

4. Criminal; Criminal enforcement law Pages: 106-110 Issue №3636
Theoretical bases of the interaction between Common and Specific parts of criminal code of RSFSR of 1960
the elements of the crime principles of criminal law plurality of crimes the circumstances excluding criminality of act stages of Commission of crime
Show more
6. Criminal law and criminology; Criminal enforcement law Pages: 153-157 Issue №13807
RESPONSIBILITY FOR CRIMES CONCERNING THE FORCE FOR SUICIDAL BEHAVIOR ON THE EXAMPLE OF A NUMBER OF FOREIGN COUNTRIES OF THE ANGLO-SAXON LEGAL SYSTEM (UK, NEW ZEALAND, INDIA)
suicide suicide crime criminal liability incitement
Show more
7. Criminal law, Criminal enforcement law, Criminology Pages: 127-132 Issue №4088
The compozition of criminal law norms of common and specific parts of legislation of ukraine, latvia and bulgaria
the elements of the crime principles of criminal law the circumstances excluding criminality of act stages of Commission of crime complicity in the crime
Show more
6. Criminal; Criminal enforcement law Pages: 155-158 Issue №11188
Regulation of responsibility for complicity in a crime in the form of mediation in bribery
intermediation in bribery complicity in the crime complicity companiesto
Show more