The Distinctive Features of Hostile Takeovers in Russia: the Legal Aspect
( Pp. 164-167)
More about authors
Erahtina Olga S.
k.yu.n., docent, docent kafedry grazhdanskogo i predprinimatelskogo prava
Higher School of Economics, Perm, Russia
Higher School of Economics, Perm, Russia
Abstract:
This article discusses the legal phenomenon of a hostile takeover in connection with specific features of this process in Russia. The tasks of this research as follows: - to give an overall overview of the specific features of hostile takeovers in the Russian market of M&A; - to determine the main methods used by raiders when takings over the target company; - to analyses protective measures which can be taken against hostile takeovers; - to determine the most effective preventive and reactive measures against hostile takeovers.
How to Cite:
Erahtina O.S., (2014), THE DISTINCTIVE FEATURES OF HOSTILE TAKEOVERS IN RUSSIA: THE LEGAL ASPECT. Business in Law, 5 => 164-167.
Reference list:
Artamonov D.A., Sevast yanova E.V. Evolyutsiya reyderstva kak osobennost rossiyskikh integratsionnykh protsessov // Sibirskiy torgovo-ekonomicheskiy zhurnal. 2009. №9.
Arutyunova K.G. Sposoby zashchity ot nedruzhestvennykh pogloshcheniy v SSHA // Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava. 2007. № 4 (68).
Astakhov P.A. Protivodeystvie reyderskim zakhvatam. M.: Eksmo, 2007.
Benedisyuk S., YAtsishin I. Zashchita ot nedruzhestvennykh pogloshcheniy// http://www.pwc.com/ua/ru/publications/publication056.jhtml
Danel yan A.A. Korporatsiya i korporativnye konflikty. M.: Izdatel skiy dom Kameron , 2007.
Dashko A.V. Mekhanizmy zashchity ot vrazhdebnykh pogloshcheniy predprinimatel skikh korporatsiy v prave SSHA // Sravnitel noe pravo i problemy chastnopravovogo regulirovaniya: mater. nauch. konferentsii aspirantov kafedry grazhdanskogo i trudovogo prava RUDN. M., 2005.
Demidova E.S. Regulirovanie priemov zashchity ot pogloshcheniy v Rossii, Evropeyskom soyuze i SSHA // Sovremennoe pravo. 2007. N 6.
ZHuravel V.P., Timoshenko E.I., Dichek A.I. Protivodeystvie reyderstvu: Prakt. posobie. - K.: Izd-vo Evrop. un-ta, 2009.
Ivanov YU. Sliyaniya, pogloshcheniya i razdelenie kompaniy: strategiya i taktika transformatsii biznesa. M.: Al pina Pablisher, 2001.
Molotnikov A. E. Sliyaniya i pogloshcheniya: rossiyskiy opyt. - M.: Vershina, 2006.
Stepanov D.I. Pogloshchenie, osushchestvlyaemoe putem priobreteniya krupnogo paketa aktsiy, i vytesnenie minoritarnykh aktsionerov// KHozyaystvo i pravo. 2006. N 4-7.
Faenson M.I., Pimanova A.A. Reyderstvo (nedruzhestvennykh zakhvat predpriyatiy. Praktika sovremennoy Rossii). M.: Al fa-press, 2007.
Arutyunova K.G. Sposoby zashchity ot nedruzhestvennykh pogloshcheniy v SSHA // Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava. 2007. № 4 (68).
Astakhov P.A. Protivodeystvie reyderskim zakhvatam. M.: Eksmo, 2007.
Benedisyuk S., YAtsishin I. Zashchita ot nedruzhestvennykh pogloshcheniy// http://www.pwc.com/ua/ru/publications/publication056.jhtml
Danel yan A.A. Korporatsiya i korporativnye konflikty. M.: Izdatel skiy dom Kameron , 2007.
Dashko A.V. Mekhanizmy zashchity ot vrazhdebnykh pogloshcheniy predprinimatel skikh korporatsiy v prave SSHA // Sravnitel noe pravo i problemy chastnopravovogo regulirovaniya: mater. nauch. konferentsii aspirantov kafedry grazhdanskogo i trudovogo prava RUDN. M., 2005.
Demidova E.S. Regulirovanie priemov zashchity ot pogloshcheniy v Rossii, Evropeyskom soyuze i SSHA // Sovremennoe pravo. 2007. N 6.
ZHuravel V.P., Timoshenko E.I., Dichek A.I. Protivodeystvie reyderstvu: Prakt. posobie. - K.: Izd-vo Evrop. un-ta, 2009.
Ivanov YU. Sliyaniya, pogloshcheniya i razdelenie kompaniy: strategiya i taktika transformatsii biznesa. M.: Al pina Pablisher, 2001.
Molotnikov A. E. Sliyaniya i pogloshcheniya: rossiyskiy opyt. - M.: Vershina, 2006.
Stepanov D.I. Pogloshchenie, osushchestvlyaemoe putem priobreteniya krupnogo paketa aktsiy, i vytesnenie minoritarnykh aktsionerov// KHozyaystvo i pravo. 2006. N 4-7.
Faenson M.I., Pimanova A.A. Reyderstvo (nedruzhestvennykh zakhvat predpriyatiy. Praktika sovremennoy Rossii). M.: Al fa-press, 2007.
Keywords:
hostile takeover, the system of preventive measures, operational methods of protection, joint stock company, corporate law.
