LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY: A LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THIS PHENOMENON
( Pp. 21-23)

More about authors
Zamaletdinov Albert A. aspirant kafedry teorii i istorii gosudarstva i prava
FGAOU VPO "Kazan (Volga region) Federal University"
Abstract:
The article deals with modern problems of legal science. Objective: To carry out a legal analysis of the phenomenon of legal responsibility. Objectives: To examine the main theoretical and legal aspects of the legal liability. Methods: The methodological framework of legal liability is the dialectical approach to the study of social reality. Conclusions: The author based on the analysis of the provisions of the current legislation and the views of jurists attempt to consider the legal nature of the phenomenon of legal responsibility, to carry out a specific legal analysis, to point out the main aspects of the concept, which is especially important when considering the issue. In fact, the science of law no uniform approach to the definition of the phenomenon - the legal responsibility and identified uses are mainly determined by the law, which ultimately affects the quality of law and order in the state. The paper not only reveals the concept of legal responsibility, but also to conduct the necessary analyzing it
How to Cite:
Zamaletdinov A.A., (2015), LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY: A LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THIS PHENOMENON. Business in Law, 4 => 21-23.
Reference list:
Vedomosti S ezda narodnykh deputatov RSFSR i Verkhovnogo Soveta RSFSR. 1990. № 2. St.22.
Golovin S.YU. Slovar prakticheskogo psikhologa. Minsk.: KHarvest, 1998 g.
Dobrokhotov A.L. TSel // Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya / In-t filosofii RAN; Nats. obshchestv.- nauch. fond; Preds. nauchno-red. soveta V. S. Styepin, zamestiteli preds.: A. A. Guseynov, G. YU. Semigin, uch. sekr. A. P. Ogurtsov. - 2-e izd., ispr. i dopol. - M.: Mysl , 2010. - ISBN 978-5-244-01115-9.
Internet-resurs - http://www.rg.ru/2015/07/20/avariya.html.
Leyst O.E. Metodologicheskie problemy yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti. Problemy teorii gosudarstva i prava. M., 1999. S. 474.
Lipinskiy D.A. Problemy yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti / Pod red. dokt. yurid. nauk, prof. R.L. KHachaturova. 2-e izdanie, pererab. i dop. - SPb.: Izdatel stvo YUridicheskiy tsentr Press , 2004. S.6
Lipinskiy D.A. Kontseptsii pozitivnoy yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti v otechestvennoy yurisprudentsii // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2014. N 6. S. 37 - 51.
Mal tsev V.V. Sotsial naya otvetstvennost lichnosti, ugolovnoe pravo i ugolovnaya otvetstvennost // Pravovedenie. 2000. N 6. S. 152 - 155.
Narutto S.V. Problemy yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti sub ekta Federatsii // Pravovedenie. 1998. N 4. S. 49.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 20 dekabrya 1995 goda № 17-P.
Sergeev K.A., Slinin YA.A. Priroda i razum: antichnaya paradigma. - L.: LGU, 1991 - S.33-34
Svod Zakonov Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1998. № 1. St.4
SHundikov K.I. TSeli i sredstva v prave (obshcheteoreticheskiy aspekt): Avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov, 1999, s.11
Keywords:
phenomenon, legal liability, goals and aspects of legal liability, state-legal mechanism.