About adversarial form of Criminal Procedure and Evidence using «electronic evidence»
( Pp. 61-64)
More about authors
Pastukhov Pavel Sisoevich
kand. yurid. nauk, docent. Dolzhnost: docent kafedry. Mesto raboty: Permskiy gosudarstvennyy nacionalnyy issledovatelskiy universitet. Podrazdelenie: kafedra ugolovnogo processa i kriminalistiki.
Perm State National Research University
Perm State National Research University
Abstract:
The article explains the need to strengthen the competitiveness of proof in mind the increasing use of electronic evidence. Investigative process involves unilateral nature of interpreting evidence about the circumstances of the case. Investigation of crimes involving electronic evidence makes it necessary to attract special knowledge. Judge must be submitted competing interpretations available electronic information so that it can fully appreciate it. No qualitative changes in the procedures of criminal procedure of proof is impossible to introduce new information technologies and individual rights
How to Cite:
Pastukhov P.S., (2014), ABOUT ADVERSARIAL FORM OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND EVIDENCE USING «ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE». Business in Law, 4 => 61-64.
Reference list:
Abdrakhmanov R.S. Effektivnost printsipa sostyazatel nosti // Rossiyskiy sud ya. 2003. № 6.
Aleksandrov A. S. Pokhvala teorii formal nykh dokazatel stv // Pravovedenie. 2002. № 4.
Aleksandrov A. S. Printsipy ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Pravovedenie. 2003. № 5. S. 162-175.
Emuzov A.S. Osobennosti protsessual nogo dokazyvaniya v usloviyakh sostyazatel nosti po UPK RF // Rossiyskiy sud ya. 2005. № 3.
Kirillova N.P. Protsessual nye funktsii professional nykh uchastnikov sostyazatel nogo sudebnogo razbiratel stva ugolovnykh del. SPb., 2007.
Kronov E.V. O realizatsii printsipov sostyazatel nosti i ravnopraviya storon v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2008. № 2.
Kukhta A.A. Dokazyvanie istiny v ugolovnom protsesse //Avtoref. dis d-ra yurid. nauk. N. Novgorod, 2010.
Makarkin A.I. Sostyazatel nost na predvaritel nom sledstvii. SPb., 2004.
Motovilovker YA.O. Osnovnye ugolovno-protsessual nye funktsii. YAroslavl . 1976.
Polyakov M.P. Printsip chistoy sostyazatel nosti kak istochnik problem sudebnogo sledstviya // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2007. №1.
Strogovich M.S. Ugolovnyy protsess. M., 1940.
El kind P.S. Sushchnost sovetskogo ugolovno-protsessual nogo prava. L., 1963.
Pastukhov P.S. Dokazatel stvennoe znachenie dannykh, poluchennykh v khode dosudebnogo rassledovaniya // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve №4, 2013, s. 148-151
Aleksandrov A. S. Pokhvala teorii formal nykh dokazatel stv // Pravovedenie. 2002. № 4.
Aleksandrov A. S. Printsipy ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Pravovedenie. 2003. № 5. S. 162-175.
Emuzov A.S. Osobennosti protsessual nogo dokazyvaniya v usloviyakh sostyazatel nosti po UPK RF // Rossiyskiy sud ya. 2005. № 3.
Kirillova N.P. Protsessual nye funktsii professional nykh uchastnikov sostyazatel nogo sudebnogo razbiratel stva ugolovnykh del. SPb., 2007.
Kronov E.V. O realizatsii printsipov sostyazatel nosti i ravnopraviya storon v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2008. № 2.
Kukhta A.A. Dokazyvanie istiny v ugolovnom protsesse //Avtoref. dis d-ra yurid. nauk. N. Novgorod, 2010.
Makarkin A.I. Sostyazatel nost na predvaritel nom sledstvii. SPb., 2004.
Motovilovker YA.O. Osnovnye ugolovno-protsessual nye funktsii. YAroslavl . 1976.
Polyakov M.P. Printsip chistoy sostyazatel nosti kak istochnik problem sudebnogo sledstviya // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2007. №1.
Strogovich M.S. Ugolovnyy protsess. M., 1940.
El kind P.S. Sushchnost sovetskogo ugolovno-protsessual nogo prava. L., 1963.
Pastukhov P.S. Dokazatel stvennoe znachenie dannykh, poluchennykh v khode dosudebnogo rassledovaniya // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve №4, 2013, s. 148-151
Keywords:
electronic evidence, the criminal process, competition.
