Problems of development of the Russian state policy to combat corruption
( Pp. 234-238)

More about authors
Kilâshanov Hizri Šapievič docent kafedry Akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii, kandidat filosofskih nauk
the Academy of Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia Gaponenko Vladimir F. Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor; Professor of the Department; Professor
Institute of Public Administration and Management of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation; Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Moscow, Russian Federation
For read the full article, please, register or log in
Abstract:
The task of writing this article is to study the problems of the development of Russian state policy to combat corruption. Above the test problems of corruption relations work and work overseas researchers such as R. Prebisch, Emmanuel A., I. Wallerstein, Hernando de Soto, Schumpeter and other methodological basis of the research component of the concept of economic theory of corruption, developing within the institutional economics theory. The survey system was used scientific methods of dialectical cognition system and factor analysis of the socio-economic security. Conclusion: In this article the authors justify the problems of development of Russian state policy to combat corruption. Arguments to determine the main directions of the state policy on anti-corruption. The findings of the study theoretical principles stated in Article conclusions and practical recommendations can contribute to a coordinated state policy in the fight against corruption and economic security, combating organized and economic crime. The practical significance of the study results is that they are aimed at addressing the challenges facing the authorities to ensure the protection of the economic interests of the state, society and the individual from criminal corruption attacks. Conclusions and recommendations of the article can be used in the justification of national measures and mechanisms to combat corruption, the economic security of Russia, the fight against organized crime, economic orientation, counter-corruption criminal threats implementation of priority national projects, the federal target programs and innovative development of the national economy; in preparing reports top executive authorities of the Russian Federation on combating corruption and the MIA of Russia. Scientific novelty of articles addressing the issue determined by a complex anti-corruption as a systemic threat to the economic security of the country. This article is intended for researchers and practitioners.
How to Cite:
Kilâshanov H.Š., Gaponenko V.F., (2014), PROBLEMS OF DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN STATE POLICY TO COMBAT CORRUPTION. Business in Law, 3: 234-238.
Reference list:
Andrianov V.D. Byurokratiya, korruptsiya i effektivnost gosudarstvennogo upravleniya: istoriya i sovremennost /V.D. Andrianov.-2-e izd. -M.: Volters Kluver, 2011. S.161-163.
Bakunin M.A. Korruptsiya // Voprosy filosofii. 1990. № 12. S. 23.
Vallerstayn I. Posle liberalizma. M., 2003. S.45.
Gaponenko V.F., Palishkina O.V. Aktual nye aspekty gosudarstvennogo kontrolya v sfere protivodeystviya nalogovym pravonarusheniyam // Trudy akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii. - M., 2012. № 1 (21). S. 54-58.
Gurov M.P. Korruptsiya kak slozhnoe sotsial no-ekonomicheskoe yavlenie, predstavlyayushchee ugrozu natsional noy bezopasnosti // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. № 6. 2008. S. 48-49.
Elisov P. O razvitii profilakticheskoy funktsii antikorruptsionnogo zakonodatel stva // Materialy k VII sessii Letney SHkoly dlya molodykh spetsialistov v oblasti ugolovnogo prava i kriminologii. Antikorruptsionnaya i antikriminal naya politika Rossii i ee sub ektov. 29-30 iyunya 2010 g. Vladivostok. S. 22-26.
Konfutsiy. Lun yuy. Izrecheniya. M., 2005. S.22, 32, 46.
Kontseptsiya sudebnoy reformy v Rossiyskoy Federatsii / pod red. B.A. Zolotukhina. M.: ZAO Redaktsiya gazety Demokraticheskiy vybor , 2001. S. 25.
Levantovskiy L.V. Osobennosti granitsy oblasti ustoychivosti // Funktsional nyy analiz i ego prilozheniya.1982, t.16, vyp.1. S. 57-59.
Obolonskiy A.V. Byurokratiya dlya 21 veka Modeli gosudarstvennoy sluzhby (Rossiya, SSHA, Angliya, Avstraliya). - M., 2002. S.14-15.
Okhotskiy E.V. Korruptsiya: sushchnost , mery protivodeystviya.//Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2009. № 9 (305). S.29-30.
Rumyantseva E.E. Novaya ekonomicheskaya entsiklopediya 3-e izd.-M.:INFRA-M,2008.-S.450.
Rumyantseva E.E. Nravstvennye osnovy ekonomiki.-M.: Infra -M., 2010. S.53-55.
SHabrov O.F. Dinamika izmeneniya udel nogo vesa i vliyaniya korporativnogo komponenta politicheskoy elity postsovetskoy Rossii // Elity i obshchestvo v sravnitel nom izmerenii: Sb. st. / Pod red. O.V. Gaman-Golutvinoy. M.: Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (ROSPEN), 2011. S. 309 319.
SHabrov O.F. Effektivnost gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v usloviyakh postmoderna // Vlast . 2010. №5. S.4-9.
Keywords:
administrative reform, public policy, corruption, anti-corruption, the prevention of corruption, backbone, complex and multi-layered corruption.