SOME QUESTIONS OF QUALIFICATION IN ADVANCE NOT PROMISED CONCEALMENT OF CRIMES
( Pp. 48-51)

More about authors
Milina Olga Vladimirovna adyunkt kafedry ugolovnogo prava
Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
For read the full article, please, register or log in
Abstract:
This article discusses the problematic issues connected with qualification of in advance not promised concealment of crimes, delimitation this crime from other types of criminal activity, and also the conclusion about the necessity of a new decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation for the generalization of judicial practice on these crimes, containing recommendations on topical issues of their qualifications, for reduction the number of mistakes in law-enforcement activity
How to Cite:
Milina O.V., (2014), SOME QUESTIONS OF QUALIFICATION IN ADVANCE NOT PROMISED CONCEALMENT OF CRIMES. Business in Law, 3 => 48-51.
Reference list:
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2003. №3. Elektronnyy resurs URL: http://www.vsrf.ru/.(data obrashcheniya: 10.04.2013).
Baymurzin G.I. Otvetstvennost za prikosnovennost k prestupleniyu. - Alma-Ata, 1968. S.104.
Zarubin A.V. Ugolovno-pravovoe regulirovanie prikosnovennosti k prestupleniyu. Dis kand.yur.nauk. Krasnoyarsk, 2004. S.77-78.
Kuznetsova N.F. Ob odnoy diskussionnoy rabote./ Vestnik MGU. 1958. S.153.
Makarov A.D. Ukryvatel stvo prestupleniy i sovershenstvovanie ugolovnogo zakonodatel stva// CHernye dyry v Rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2004 S.108.
Merkushev M.I. Otvetstvennost za ukryvatel stvo.// Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost .1955. №1. S.17.
Milina O.V. K voprosu otgranicheniya zaranee ne obeshchannogo ukryvatel stva prestupleniy ot posobnichestva kak vida souchastiya v prestuplenii. // Probely v Rossiyskom zakonodatel stve, № 1, 2014. S. 154-157.
Smirnov V.G. Ponyatie prikosnovennosti po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. M.,1957. S.59.
Tagantsev N.S. Russkoe ugolovnoe pravo. CHast obshch. Tula: Avtograf, 2001. T.1. S.628.
Esenbaev N.B. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za zaranee ne obeshchannoe ukryvatel stvo po zakonodatel stvu Kyrgyzskoy Respubliki. Dis k.yu.n. M.,2006. S.77.
Keywords:
in advance not the promised concealment of crimes, qualification in advance not promised concealment, the delimitation of the victims did not report the crime, the implication for crime.


Related Articles

Issue №4029
SOME QUESTIONS OF QUALIFICATION IN ADVANCE NOT PROMISED CONCEALMENT OF CRIMES
in advance not the promised concealment of crimes qualification in advance not promised concealment the delimitation of the victims did not report the crime the implication for crime
Show more
Issue №9479
CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR FAILURE TO REPORT A CRIME
misprision failure to report a crime the implication for crime public safety
Show more
Issue №3636
To the question of delimitation in advance not promised concealment of crimes from complicity as type of partnership in a crime
in advance not the promised concealment of crimes ogranichitelya signs in advance promised concealment as a form of complicity the implication for crime
Show more
Issue №10553
NOT REPORTING OF A CRIME ACCORDING TO THE NATIONAL CRIMINAL LEGISLATION
failure (non-information) about the crime the implication for crime public safety the interests of justice
Show more