The Concept of e-Justice Development in Extreme Conditions: The Experience of Russia and Abroad
( Pp. 86-91)

The purpose of the study. The article examines the problems of including electronic justice in the judicial activity in extreme conditions and the possibility of its implementation in the practice of protecting the constitutional rights and legitimate interests of individuals and legal entities in Russia and abroad. It is determined that, in accordance with UN General Assembly Resolution No. 74/306, adopted on September 11, 2020 at the 64th plenary meeting of the 74th session, “Comprehensive and coordinated responses to the coronavirus disease pandemic (COVID-19)”, States must ensure that all human rights are respected, protected and respected in the fight against the pandemic in full compliance with their obligations and obligations under international law, including international humanitarian law and international human rights law, which follows from the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (article 4). It is established that the legal mechanism of restrictions, including in the. Conclusion. As a result of the conducted research, it is determined that the main problem associated with the development of electronic justice is that at the state level it is necessary to improve the mechanism for the administration of justice in extreme conditions. The solution of this problem requires the creation of a scientifically based and confirmed by world practice algorithm for correcting the legal norms of the current federal legislation, which forms the organizational and legal mechanism of justice, ensuring its functioning in extreme conditions. The use of this approach makes it possible to summarize the accumulated world experience of “electronic justice” in extreme situations, as well as domestic federal and regional experience, and to incorporate legal norms into the current legislation in the digital reality with respect for the constitutional rights and legitimate interests of citizens to implement fair justice.

Fokov A.P., (2021), THE CONCEPT OF E-JUSTICE DEVELOPMENT IN EXTREME CONDITIONS: THE EXPERIENCE OF RUSSIA AND ABROAD. Sociopolitical Sciences, 3 => 86-91.

Anisimova A.S. Elektronnoe pravosudie kak pokazatel informatsionnogo razvitiya obshchestva i gosudarstva // TSivilistika: pravo i protsess. 2019. № 3.
Bryantseva O.V., Soldatkina O.L. Elektronnoe pravosudie v Rossii: problemy i puti resheniya // Vestnik un-ta im. O.E. Kutafina (MGYUA). 2019. № 12 (64). S. 97-98.
Bryantseva O.V., Soldatkina O.L. Sravnitel nyy analiz zarubezhnykh sistem elektronnogo pravosudiya // Vestnik Povolzhskogo in-ta upravleniya. 2919. T. 19. № 6. S. 36-47.
Borisova L.V. Elektronnoe pravosudie kak forma sudebnoy zashchity v Rossii // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2020. T. 15. № 6. S. 105-111.
Burdina E.V., Petukhov N.A. Nauchnaya kontseptsiya organizatsii sudebnoy deyatel nosti v usloviyakh tsifrovoy transformatsii: ponyatie i soderzhanie // Rossiyskoe pravosudie. 2020. № 6. S. 13-25.
Burdina E.V. Novye organizatsionnye formy otpravleniya pravosudiya: opyt sudov v Respublike Kazakhstan // Rossiyskiy sud ya. 2021. № 1. S. 49-53.
Dolzhenko A.N. Elektronnyy dokumentooborot v sudakh i perspektivy ego sovershenstvovaniya // Rossiyskoe pravosudie. 2020. № 1. S. 47-63.
Kazakhstantsy mogut obratit sya v sud s lyubogo gadzheta. URL: https://www.sud.gov.kz/rus/news/kazahstancy-mogutobratitsya-v-sud-s-lyubogo-gadzheta
Kleandrov M.I. Razmyshleniya na temu: mozhet li sud ey byt robot // Rossiyskoe pravosudie. 2018. № 6. S. 15-25.
Kazakov N.S. Dostupnost pravosudiya v usloviyakh pandemii // Voprosy studencheskoy nauki. Vyp. 1 (53). 2021.
Momotov V.V. Vystuplenie na plenarnom zasedanii VI Moskovskogo yuridicheskogo foruma po teme Sudebnaya vlast v usloviyakh sovremennykh tsifrovykh tekhnologiy (MGYUA(U), 4 apr. 2019 g.). URL: http://www.ssrf.ru/news/lienta novostiei/32548
Spesivov N.V., Titov A.A. Pandemiya COVID-19 kak faktor vynuzhdennoy tsifrovizatsii russkogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Vestnik Saratovskoy gos. yurid. akad. 2020. № 3 (134). S. 193-200.
Tishchenko A.V. Elektronnoe pravosudie: sudebnoe reformirovanie k 2024 godu // Pravoporyadok: istoriya, teoriya, praktika. 2018. № 4 (19).
Rezolyutsiya General noy Assamblei OON № 74/306, prinyatoy 11 sentyabrya 2020 goda na 64-m plenarnom zasedanii 74-y sessii Vseob emlyushchie i skoordinirovannye mery reagirovaniya na pandemiyu koronavirusnogo zabolevaniya (COVID-19) OON A/RES/74/306 // Ofitsial nyy sayt Organizatsii Ob edinennykh Natsiy: www.un.org.
Mezhdunarodnyy pakt o grazhdanskikh i politicheskikh pravakh ot 16 dekabrya 1966 goda i fakul tativnye protokoly k nemu. URL: https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Events/EmergencyMeasures COVID-19 ru.pdf

concept, electronic justice, extreme conditions, citizens rights and freedoms, fair justice.