BIDDING IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS: PROBLEMS OF OVERSTATING THE INITIAL SALE PRICE AND THE COSTS OF BIDDING
( Pp. 159-167)

The purpose of the research. The article discusses the ways and consequences of overstating the costs of bidding by collateral creditors in the course of bankruptcy procedures of legal entities and individuals. The article analyzes such problems identified in law enforcement practice as overstatement of the initial sale price of the pledged item by the collateral lender, unjustified involvement of a third-party specialized organization as the auction organizer instead of the arbitration manager, the establishment of remuneration for the auction organizer and the operator of the trading platform depending on the price of the object of sale. The purpose of the research is to analyze the problems associated with the overestimation of the costs of bidding by collateral creditors, and to develop proposals for their solution. Results. Based on the conducted research, the author concludes that in practice, collateral creditors, using the right to determine the initial sale price of the property that is the subject of collateral, often set it in an inflated amount. At the same time, they often attract a friendly person as the organizer of the auction and the operator of the trading platform and disproportionately overestimate the amount of his remuneration, determining it as a percentage of the price of the property being sold. These conditions are significantly worse than the market conditions. Expenses are reimbursed at the expense of the bankruptcy estate in an extraordinary manner. As a result, the first and repeated auctions are held to no avail, the bankruptcy procedure is delayed, the costs of bidding are significantly increased, the bankruptcy estate loses significant funds to the detriment of the property interests of all other creditors, and the general legal principles and principles of bankruptcy law are violated. The author gives recommendations on amendments to the current legislation on bankruptcy, aimed at solving these problems in order to prevent unfair actions of collateral creditors and other persons in determining the procedure and conditions for the sale of the debtor's property, as well as to increase the currently extremely low level of satisfaction of creditors ' claims.

Yulova E.S., (2021), BIDDING IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS: PROBLEMS OF OVERSTATING THE INITIAL SALE PRICE AND THE COSTS OF BIDDING. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 3 => 159-167.

Balandina M., Rodionova S., Balakina A. Obzor resheniy Verkhovnogo Suda RF po voprosam bankrotstva za may 2019 g. // Finansovye i bukhgalterskie konsul tatsii: elektron. zhurn. 2019. № 7. S. 3 - 8. URL: https://www.fbk.ru /analytics/magazine/ (data obrashcheniya: 02.07.2019).
Bukina I. Netselesoobrazno dublirovat informatsiyu o bankrotstve v Kommersante . - URL: https://pravo.ru /lf/opinion/211597/ (data obrashcheniya: 10.06.2021).
Egorov A.V. Konkursnoe proizvodstvo: kommentariy klyuchevykh momentov // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. 2019. № 1. S. 114 - 139.
Ershov D.V. Pravovaya priroda i sootnoshenie poryadka provedeniya torgov v elektronnoy forme i poryadka prodazhi imushchestva dolzhnika // Predprinimatel skoe pravo. 2019. № 1. S. 46 - 53. SPS Konsul tantPlyus.
Ershov D.V. Sovershenstvovanie zakonodatel stva o bankrotstve v chasti regulirovaniya poryadka provedeniya torgov // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2018. № 11. S. 87 - 95. SPS Konsul tantPlyus.
Institut nesostoyatel nosti (bankrotstva) v pravovoy sisteme Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran: teoriya i praktika pravoprimeneniya: monografiya / A.B. Baranova, A.Z. Bobyleva, V.A. Vaypan i dr.; otv. red. S.A. Karelina, I.V. Frolov. M.: YUstitsinform, 2020. 360 s.
Karelina S.A., Frolov I.V. K voprosu o modelyakh klassifikatsii kreditorov v delakh o bankrotstve // Vestnik arbitrazhnoy praktiki. 2020. № 6. S. 14 - 26.
Karelina S.A. Osobennosti realizatsii konstitutsionnykh printsipov v protsesse nesostoyatel nosti (bankrotstva) // Predprinimatel skoe pravo. Prilozhenie Pravo i Biznes . 2019. № 1. S. 7 - 14.
Karelina S.A. Sistema ogranicheniy prav kreditorov kak element mekhanizma pravovogo regulirovaniya nesostoyatel nosti (bankrotstva) grazhdanina. CHast 2 // Pravo i ekonomika. 2020. № 12. S. 35 - 44.
Kudinova M.S. O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh v sudebnoy praktike pri realizatsii imushchestva nesostoyatel noy organizatsii // Arbitrazhnye spory. 2020. № 2. S. 95 - 114. SPS Konsul tantPlyus.
Kuznetsov S.A. Osnovnye problemy pravovogo instituta nesostoyatel nosti (bankrotstva): Monografiya. M.: Infotropik Media, 2015.
Mikheenko D. Bankrot obeshchaet diskont 29.11.2019 // URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/amp/4179917 (data obrashcheniya: 12.05.2021).
Nikolaev A.R. Raskhody na raskrytie informatsii v delakh o bankrotstve // Predprinimatel skoe pravo. Prilozhenie Pravo i Biznes . 2016. № 3. S. 41 - 45.
Osmanova D.O. Zloupotrebleniya pri nesostoyatel nosti (bankrotstve): monografiya / pod red. O.A. Belyaevoy. M.: YUstitsinform, 2020. 184 s. SPS Konsul tantPlyus.
Publichno-pravovye sredstva effektivnosti razvitiya ekonomiki i finansov. CH.1. Publichno-pravovye sredstva upravleniya, ekonomicheskogo i sotsial nogo prostranstva : monografiya / kol. avtorov ; pod red. G.F. Ruchkinoy, M.A. Lapinoy. - M. : RUSAYNS, 2020. 246 s.
Sarnakova A.V. Obespechenie zashchity prav i zakonnykh interesov kreditorov pri bankrotstve dolzhnika (nachalo) // YUrist. 2020. № 4. S. 60 - 65.
SHilova YU. Zalog v arende: problemy udovletvoreniya trebovaniy kreditora // Bankovskoe obozrenie. Prilozhenie BankNadzor . 2019. № 2. S. 90 - 91.
SHishmareva T.P. Prodazha imushchestva nesostoyatel nogo dolzhnika na publichnykh torgakh v protsedurakh nesostoyatel nosti (bankrotstva) // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2021. № 1. S. 70 - 73.

bankruptcy, insolvency, bidding, collateral creditor, auction organizer, sale of the debtor's property, electronic platform operator, initial price.