Applying the Consequences of Invalid Transactions: Theory and Law Enforcement Practice
( Pp. 195-199)
More about authors
Kleimenova Marina Olegovna
kand. yurid. nauk, docent, docent kafedry Teorii gosudarstva i prava, docent kafedry Grazhdanskogo prava i processa; Generalnyy direktor
Moscow International University; Limited Liability Company "PJS-consult"
Moscow, Russia
Moscow International University; Limited Liability Company "PJS-consult"
Moscow, Russia
Abstract:
The purpose of the study: the purpose of this study is to analyze the legal consequences of the invalidity of transactions from a theoretical and practical point of view, to consider the features and problems of the application by the courts of the main consequences of the invalidity of transactions. Conclusions: As a result of the study, the author made several conclusions, including that since 2013, the legislator has significantly changed the grounds for recognizing a transaction as disputed and applying the consequences of an invalid transaction, as well as limited the powers of the court in applying the consequences of an invalid transaction; in law enforcement practice, there have been changes in some grounds for applying the consequences of void transactions, in particular, since 2015, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation has made changes to the grounds for recognizing a transaction as fake. Since 2015, there have been court decisions on recognizing transactions as fake, the purpose of which is to cover up other transactions, among which there are transactions that cover up transactions made with other participants and with other essential conditions. As a result of the analysis of examples of decisions of courts of general jurisdiction, as well as arbitration courts, various legal approaches of courts and arbitration courts to resolving issues related to the recognition of transactions as invalid and the application of the consequences of invalid transactions are traced.
How to Cite:
Kleimenova M.O., (2021), APPLYING THE CONSEQUENCES OF INVALID TRANSACTIONS: THEORY AND LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 3 => 195-199.
Reference list:
Konventsiya o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod quot; (Zaklyuchena v g. Rime 04.11.1950) (s izm. ot 13.05.2004) (st. 1 v red. Protokola №11)// SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast odin) ot 30.11.1994 № 51-FZ. (v red. ot 08.12.2020)// SPS Konsul tanPlyus .
Federal nyy zakon ot 07 maya 2013 goda №100-FZ O vnesenii izmeneniy v podrazdely 4 i 5 razdela 1 chasti pervoy i stat i 1153 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii//SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Postanovlenie Sed mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 29 noyabrya 2016 g. № 07AP-623/12 // https://base.garant.ru/61599850/.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 21.04.2003 № 6-P quot;Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy punktov 1 i 2 stat i 167 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s zhalobami grazhdan O.M. Marinichevoy, A.V. Nemirovskoy, Z.A. Sklyanovoy, R.M. Sklyanovoy i V.M. SHiryaeva quot;// SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 23.06.2015 № 25 quot;O primenenii sudami nekotorykh polozheniy razdela I chasti pervoy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii quot;// SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Postanovleniem Prezidiuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 17.06.2020 po delu № 381-PEK19// http://vsrf.ru/stor pdf ec.php (vsrf.ru).
Mel nikova YU.V. Nedeystvitel nost (nichtozhnost ) mnimykh i pritvornykh sdelok i ikh pravovye posledstviya // Rossiyskiy sud ya. 2014. № 11. - S. 7 - 12.
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast odin) ot 30.11.1994 № 51-FZ. (v red. ot 08.12.2020)// SPS Konsul tanPlyus .
Federal nyy zakon ot 07 maya 2013 goda №100-FZ O vnesenii izmeneniy v podrazdely 4 i 5 razdela 1 chasti pervoy i stat i 1153 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii//SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Postanovlenie Sed mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 29 noyabrya 2016 g. № 07AP-623/12 // https://base.garant.ru/61599850/.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 21.04.2003 № 6-P quot;Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy punktov 1 i 2 stat i 167 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s zhalobami grazhdan O.M. Marinichevoy, A.V. Nemirovskoy, Z.A. Sklyanovoy, R.M. Sklyanovoy i V.M. SHiryaeva quot;// SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 23.06.2015 № 25 quot;O primenenii sudami nekotorykh polozheniy razdela I chasti pervoy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii quot;// SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Postanovleniem Prezidiuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 17.06.2020 po delu № 381-PEK19// http://vsrf.ru/stor pdf ec.php (vsrf.ru).
Mel nikova YU.V. Nedeystvitel nost (nichtozhnost ) mnimykh i pritvornykh sdelok i ikh pravovye posledstviya // Rossiyskiy sud ya. 2014. № 11. - S. 7 - 12.
Keywords:
invalid transaction, void transaction, disputed transaction, restitution, vindication.
