Optimizing Tilt Angle for Enhanced Solar Panel Efficiency: A Case Study in Parkent, Uzbekistan
( Pp. 203-208)
More about authors
Nosirov Mirjalol U. o‘g‘li
PhD student
Institute of Materials Science Academy of Sciences of Uzbekistan
Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan Sobirov Yuldash B. Dr. Sci. (Eng.)
Institute of Materials Science Academy of Sciences of Uzbekistan
Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan Nurmatov Shavkat R. Cand. Sci. (Eng.)
Institute of Materials Science, Academy of Sciences of Uzbekistan
Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan Rakhimov Khamdam Yu. Dr. Sci. (Phys.-Math.)
Institute of Materials Science, Academy of Sciences of Uzbekistan
Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan
Institute of Materials Science Academy of Sciences of Uzbekistan
Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan Sobirov Yuldash B. Dr. Sci. (Eng.)
Institute of Materials Science Academy of Sciences of Uzbekistan
Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan Nurmatov Shavkat R. Cand. Sci. (Eng.)
Institute of Materials Science, Academy of Sciences of Uzbekistan
Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan Rakhimov Khamdam Yu. Dr. Sci. (Phys.-Math.)
Institute of Materials Science, Academy of Sciences of Uzbekistan
Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan
Abstract:
The efficiency of photovoltaic (PV) systems is significantly influenced by the tilt angle of solar panels, especially in regions with varying solar insolation across seasons. This study investigates the optimal tilt angle for a 10 kW solar-powered system installed in the Parkent district of Uzbekistan, a region characterized by a continental climate and high solar irradiance. Based on empirical formulas, the research identifies 33° as the fixed optimal tilt angle for year-round operation. Seasonal adjustments offer marginal gains, with two- and four-season tilt configurations improving performance by up to 4%. The findings highlight the importance of site-specific tilt optimization in maximizing solar energy harvesting, which is particularly relevant for autonomous renewable energy systems used in hydrogen production.
How to Cite:
Nosirov M.U. o‘g‘li, Sobirov Yu.В. , Nurmatov Sh.R., and Rakhimov Kh.Yu. Optimizing tilt angle for enhanced solar panel efficiency: A case study in Parkent, Uzbekistan. Computational Nanotechnology. 12, 3 (2025), 203–208. DOI: 10.33693/2313-223X-2025-12-3-203-208. EDN: CBCVDJ
Reference list:
Душкин Р.В. Искусственный интеллект. М.: ДМК-Пресс, 2019. 280 с. ISBN: 978-5-97060-787-9.
Lai J., Gan W., Wu J. et al. Large language models in law: A survey // AI Open. 2024. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666651024000172 (data of accesses: 13.10.2023).
Ma S., Chen C., Chu Q. et al. Leveraging large language models for relevance judgments in legal case retrieval // arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.18405. 2024. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.18405 (data of accesses: 13.10.2023).
Paul V. Automation in legal: The increasing role of AI // Medium. 2024. URL: https://medium.com/@vincentpaulai/automation-in-legal-the-increasing-role-of-ai-70724ef0b225 (data of accesses: 13.10.2023).
Magesh V., Surani F., Dahl M. et al. Hallucination-free? Assessing the reliability of leading AI legal research tools // arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.20362. 2024. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.20362 (data of accesses: 13.10.2023).
The future of artificial intelligence in the legal industry: Opportunities, challenges, and ethical considerations // Legal Stuff. URL: https://medium.com/@legal.stuff.notion/the-future-of-artificial-intelligence-in-the-legal-industry-opportunities-challenges-and-ethical-61c3198b425a (data of accesses: 13.10.2023).
Корнеенков А.А., Янов Ю.К., Рязанцев С.В. и др. Метаанализ клинических исследований в оториноларингологии // Вестник оториноларингологии. 2020. Т. 85. № 2. С. 26–30. DOI: 10.17116/otorino20208502126.
Душкин Р.В. Обзор подходов и методов искусственного интеллекта // Радиоэлектронные технологии. 2018. № 3. С. 85–89.
Румянцев П.О., Саенко У.В., Румянцева У.В. Статистические методы анализа в клинической практике. Ч. 1. Одномерный статистический анализ // Проблемы эндокринологии. 2009. Т. 55. № 5. С. 48–55. DOI: 10.14341/probl200955548-55.
Душкин Р.В. Почему за гибридными ИИ-системами будущее // Экономические стратегии. 2018. № 6 (156). С. 84–93.
Akbarov R.Yu. Determination of the optimum tilt of solar installations. Innov. Energy Res. 2019. No. 8 (1). P. 223.
Skerlic J. et al. Optimal position of solar collectors: A review. Appl. Eng. Lett. 2018. No. 3 (4). Pp. 129 134.
Lai J., Gan W., Wu J. et al. Large language models in law: A survey // AI Open. 2024. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666651024000172 (data of accesses: 13.10.2023).
Ma S., Chen C., Chu Q. et al. Leveraging large language models for relevance judgments in legal case retrieval // arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.18405. 2024. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.18405 (data of accesses: 13.10.2023).
Paul V. Automation in legal: The increasing role of AI // Medium. 2024. URL: https://medium.com/@vincentpaulai/automation-in-legal-the-increasing-role-of-ai-70724ef0b225 (data of accesses: 13.10.2023).
Magesh V., Surani F., Dahl M. et al. Hallucination-free? Assessing the reliability of leading AI legal research tools // arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.20362. 2024. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.20362 (data of accesses: 13.10.2023).
The future of artificial intelligence in the legal industry: Opportunities, challenges, and ethical considerations // Legal Stuff. URL: https://medium.com/@legal.stuff.notion/the-future-of-artificial-intelligence-in-the-legal-industry-opportunities-challenges-and-ethical-61c3198b425a (data of accesses: 13.10.2023).
Корнеенков А.А., Янов Ю.К., Рязанцев С.В. и др. Метаанализ клинических исследований в оториноларингологии // Вестник оториноларингологии. 2020. Т. 85. № 2. С. 26–30. DOI: 10.17116/otorino20208502126.
Душкин Р.В. Обзор подходов и методов искусственного интеллекта // Радиоэлектронные технологии. 2018. № 3. С. 85–89.
Румянцев П.О., Саенко У.В., Румянцева У.В. Статистические методы анализа в клинической практике. Ч. 1. Одномерный статистический анализ // Проблемы эндокринологии. 2009. Т. 55. № 5. С. 48–55. DOI: 10.14341/probl200955548-55.
Душкин Р.В. Почему за гибридными ИИ-системами будущее // Экономические стратегии. 2018. № 6 (156). С. 84–93.
Akbarov R.Yu. Determination of the optimum tilt of solar installations. Innov. Energy Res. 2019. No. 8 (1). P. 223.
Skerlic J. et al. Optimal position of solar collectors: A review. Appl. Eng. Lett. 2018. No. 3 (4). Pp. 129 134.
Keywords:
tilt angle, photovoltaics, hydrogen production, optimal tilt angle, solar energy.
