Development of a Movement System for an Autonomous Robotic Platform on a Construction Site for Creating a Digital Engineering Information Model of Construction Objects
( Pp. 68-76)
More about authors
Osipov Alexey V.
Cand. Sci. (Phys.-Math.); associate professor, Department of Industrial Programming, Institute of Advanced Technologies and Industrial Programming
MIREA – Russian Technological University
Moscow, Russian Federation Lyubimov Alexander Yu. head, department from the CHU “Science and Innovation”, .
Rosatom State Atomic Energy Corporation
Moscow, Russian Federation Marinich Alexander N. Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Associate Professor; Professor, Department “Technical Means of Navigation”; Admiral Makarov State University of Maritime and Inland Shipping; St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Moscow, Russian Federation Osipova Margarita A. Department of “Technical Means of Navigation”, .
Admiral Makarov State University of Maritime and Inland Shipping
St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
MIREA – Russian Technological University
Moscow, Russian Federation Lyubimov Alexander Yu. head, department from the CHU “Science and Innovation”, .
Rosatom State Atomic Energy Corporation
Moscow, Russian Federation Marinich Alexander N. Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Associate Professor; Professor, Department “Technical Means of Navigation”; Admiral Makarov State University of Maritime and Inland Shipping; St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Moscow, Russian Federation Osipova Margarita A. Department of “Technical Means of Navigation”, .
Admiral Makarov State University of Maritime and Inland Shipping
St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Abstract:
Regular construction supervision over the execution of construction and installation work is necessary to ensure that construction proceeds at the established quality level. Of particular importance in this control is establishing precise correspondence between the geometry of structures being erected and their structural elements with the project design. The quality of such control depends on the experience of the expert geodesist. However, even an experienced expert performs many redundant measurements, which complicates and increases the processing time of the received information. For this reason, an autonomous robotic platform (ARP) based on a quadruped walking robot with an installed 3D laser scanner, navigation system, video camera, integration unit, and protective frame was utilized. The article examines the determination of movement trajectory under conditions of high congestion on construction access roads, stopping locations for 3D scanning, and the speed of ARP movement.
How to Cite:
Osipov A.V., Lyubimov A.Yu., Marinich A.N., and Osipova M.A. Development of a movement system for an autonomous robotic platform on a construction site for creating a digital engineering information model of construction objects. Computational Nanotechnology. 13, 1 (2026), 68–76. DOI: 10.33693/2313-223X-2026-13-1-68-76. EDN: MCVMJU
Reference list:
Воротников И.С., Шпак В.В. Эволюция архитектурных стилей при разработке информационных систем: от монолитных приложений к микросервисной архитектуре // Молодой ученый. 2023. № 50 (497). С. 10–14.
Ньюмен С. Создание микросервисов / пер. с англ. Н. Вильчинский. СПб.: Питер, 2023. 304 с.
Abghas Y., Mccaren A., Elger P., Solan D. Decomposition of monolith applications into microservices architectures: A systematic review // IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 2023. Vol. 49. No. 8. Pp. 4213–4242. DOI: 10.1109/TSE.2023.3287297.
Andrade B., Santos S., Silva A. From monolith to microservices: Static and dynamic analysis comparison // arXiv. 2022. Pp. 1–10. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2204.11844.
Baresi L., Quattrocchi G., Tamburri D.A. Microservice architecture practices and experience: A focused look on docker configuration files // IEEE/ACM 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP). 2022. Pp. 151–160. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2212.03107.
Barroso L., Burrows M., Sigelman B. Dapper, a large-scale distributed systems tracing infrastructure // Google Technical Report. 2010. URL: https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en//archive/papers/dapper-2010-1.pdf (data of accesses: 27.02.2026).
Berardi D., Giallorenzo S., Mauro J. et al. Security in microservices: A systematic literature review // Applied Sciences. 2022. Vol. 12. No. 3. Art. 1031. DOI: 10.3390/app12031031.
Di Francesco P., Lago P., Malavolta I. Architecting with microservices: A systematic mapping study // Journal of Systems and Software. 2019. Vol. 150. Pp. 77–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.01.001.
Dragoni N., Giallorenzo S., Lafuente A.L. et al. Microservices: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow // Present and ulterior software engineering. Cham: Springer, 2017. Pp. 195–216. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67425-4_12.
Faustino D., Gonçalves N., Portela M., Silva A.R. Stepwise migration of a monolith to a microservices architecture: Performance and migration effort evaluation // Performance Evaluation. 2024. Vol. 164. Art. 102411. DOI: 10.1016/j.peva.2024.102411.
Hassouna A.B. The Architecture Tradeoff and Risk Analysis Framework (ATRAF): A unified approach for evaluating software architectures, reference architectures, and architectural frameworks // arXiv:2505.00688 [cs.SE]. 2025. Pp. 1–36. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.00688.
Ньюмен С. Создание микросервисов / пер. с англ. Н. Вильчинский. СПб.: Питер, 2023. 304 с.
Abghas Y., Mccaren A., Elger P., Solan D. Decomposition of monolith applications into microservices architectures: A systematic review // IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 2023. Vol. 49. No. 8. Pp. 4213–4242. DOI: 10.1109/TSE.2023.3287297.
Andrade B., Santos S., Silva A. From monolith to microservices: Static and dynamic analysis comparison // arXiv. 2022. Pp. 1–10. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2204.11844.
Baresi L., Quattrocchi G., Tamburri D.A. Microservice architecture practices and experience: A focused look on docker configuration files // IEEE/ACM 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP). 2022. Pp. 151–160. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2212.03107.
Barroso L., Burrows M., Sigelman B. Dapper, a large-scale distributed systems tracing infrastructure // Google Technical Report. 2010. URL: https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en//archive/papers/dapper-2010-1.pdf (data of accesses: 27.02.2026).
Berardi D., Giallorenzo S., Mauro J. et al. Security in microservices: A systematic literature review // Applied Sciences. 2022. Vol. 12. No. 3. Art. 1031. DOI: 10.3390/app12031031.
Di Francesco P., Lago P., Malavolta I. Architecting with microservices: A systematic mapping study // Journal of Systems and Software. 2019. Vol. 150. Pp. 77–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.01.001.
Dragoni N., Giallorenzo S., Lafuente A.L. et al. Microservices: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow // Present and ulterior software engineering. Cham: Springer, 2017. Pp. 195–216. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67425-4_12.
Faustino D., Gonçalves N., Portela M., Silva A.R. Stepwise migration of a monolith to a microservices architecture: Performance and migration effort evaluation // Performance Evaluation. 2024. Vol. 164. Art. 102411. DOI: 10.1016/j.peva.2024.102411.
Hassouna A.B. The Architecture Tradeoff and Risk Analysis Framework (ATRAF): A unified approach for evaluating software architectures, reference architectures, and architectural frameworks // arXiv:2505.00688 [cs.SE]. 2025. Pp. 1–36. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.00688.
Keywords:
information modeling technologies, autonomous robotic platform, digital engineering information model, point cloud, 3D laser scanner, movement safety at construction site.
