CONVERGENCE OR DIVERGENTION OF METHODOLOGICAL SYSTEMS?
( Pp. 16-18)

The article is devoted to the problem of development of methodological knowledge on the example of historical science. The methodological confusion is stated, emphasized that in the itself fact of methodological pluralism is of no use both to specific researchers, and science as a whole. Opportunities (both theoretical, and practical character) traditional methodological approaches (Marxism, positivism, others), and the methodological innovations connected with development of post-nonclassical knowledge are shown. The emphasis is placed on research of a choice of such order: whether it is necessary to welcome a course on convergence of cultures (globalistsky tendencies), or it is necessary to pay attention to the processes connected with a divergention cultures. The theoretical arguments connected pompously "konvergentsionny" efforts are adduced.

Lepeshko B.M., (2013), CONVERGENCE OR DIVERGENTION OF METHODOLOGICAL SYSTEMS?. Sociopolitical Sciences, 3 => 16-18.

Smolenskiy N.I. Teoriya i metodologiya istorii // N.Smolenskiy. Teoriya i metodologiya istorii. M.: Izdatel skiy tsent Akademiya , 2007. 272 str.
Lepeshko B.M. Nravstvennost protiv pragmatizma i kreativnosti // Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki №4, 2012, s. 101-104

methodology, method, information, Marxism, positivism, post-non-classical knowledge, convergence, divergence, culture.