FEATURES OF EXEMPTION FROM CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF PARTICIPANTS OF TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS
( Pp. 194-197)

Task. The addition of the criminal law with articles providing for responsibility for the establishment of new types of criminal associations and participation in their activities, including such as the terrorist community and a terrorist organization, as well as subsequent changes in the relevant criminal law provisions, has led to the emergence and continuation of scientific discussions and difficulties in law enforcement related not only to the establishment and implementation of criminal responsibility, but also to the release of the participants of such associations from it. The author addressed the problem of legislative regulation of conditions of exemption from criminal liability of various participants of terrorist organizations for its solution and development of recommendations on the correct application of the criminal law. Model. The article consistently analyzes General and special conditions of exemption from criminal liability of various participants of terrorist organizations, stipulated in the current legislation, taking into account their interpretation in judicial practice and in the doctrine of criminal law. Conclusions. The conclusions formulated in the article reveal the content of the conditions of exemption from criminal liability of various participants of terrorist organizations, highlight the problems of regulation of such conditions and their implementation in practice, and contain proposals to minimize the identified problems. The possibility of subsequent use of the results of scientific work. The findings and other provisions may be of interest and may be used in the future for the preparation of training materials and training sessions for judges, prosecutors, lawyers and law enforcement officials. The practical significance of the article lies in the possibility of using its provisions in the investigation and consideration of criminal cases on the organization of and participation in the activities of a terrorist organization. Originality / value. This article is one of the first attempts of scientific understanding of the complex issue of combating terrorism that is associated with the creation and implementation of enabling rules by the example of the consideration of the peculiarities of exemption from criminal responsibility of persons who ceased participation in the activities of terrorist organizations. The article is prepared taking into account the novelties of the criminal law and relevant explanations of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. The work has a theoretical and applied nature, which implies its relevance not only for representatives of the science of criminal law and persons studying the relevant academic discipline, but also for lawyers, judges and other officials applying the criminal law.

Polichnoi R.V., (2018), FEATURES OF EXEMPTION FROM CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF PARTICIPANTS OF TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS. Sociopolitical Sciences, 2 => 194-197.

Borisov S.V. Osobennosti osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti litsa, uchastvovavshego v ekstremistskom soobshchestve / S.V. Borisov // Zakon i pravo. - 2010. - № 3. - S. 96-97.
Borisov S.V. Sovremennye problemy ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za organizovannye formy ekstremistskoy deyatel nosti / S.V. Borisov // Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. - 2015. - №3. - S. 16-19.
Gaukhman L.D. Kvalifikatsiya prestupleniy: zakon, teoriya, praktika. - 2-e izd., pererab. i dopoln. - M.: AO TSentr YUrInfoR , 2003. - 448s.
Ivantsov S.V., Borisov S.V. Organizovannye formy ekstremistskoy i terroristicheskoy deyatel nosti: reglamentatsiya i realizatsiya otvetstvennosti / S.V. Ivantsov, S.V. Borisov // Obshchestvo i pravo. - 2016. -№2. - S. 91-97.
Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (nauchno-prakticheskiy, postateynyy). 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. / Pod red. S.V. D yakova, N.G. Kadnikova. - M.: YUrisprudentsiya, 2015. - 1036s.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 27 yanvarya 1999g. № 1 (red. ot 03.03.2015) O sudebnoy praktike po delam ob ubiystve (st. 105 UK RF) (abz. 4 p. 10) // SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 27 dekabrya 2002g. № 29 (red. ot 16.05.2017) O sudebnoy praktike po delam o krazhe, grabezhe i razboe (abz. 4 p. 15) // SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 28 iyunya 2011g. № 11 (red. ot 03.11.2016) O sudebnoy praktike po ugolovnym delam o prestupleniyakh ekstremistskoy napravlennosti (abz. 1 p. 22) // SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 9 fevralya.2012 g. № 1 (red. ot 03.11.2016) O nekotorykh voprosakh sudebnoy praktiki po ugolovnym delam o prestupleniyakh terroristicheskoy napravlennosti (abz. 4 p. 227) // SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 3 noyabrya 2016 g. № 41 O vnesenii izmeneniy v postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 9 fevralya 2012 g. № 1 O nekotorykh voprosakh sudebnoy praktiki po ugolovnym delam o prestupleniyakh terroristicheskoy napravlennosti i ot 28 iyunya 2011 g. № 11 O sudebnoy praktike po ugolovnym delam o prestupleniyakh ekstremistskoy napravlennosti // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2016. 16 noyabrya.

active repentance, continuing offence, exemption from criminal liability, terrorism, terrorist activities, terrorist organization, the terrorist community, extremist organization, extremist community.