Parliamentarism in the System of Ensuring the National Security of Modern Russia
( Pp. 21-27)

The article is devoted to the definition of the role and importance of parliamentarism in ensuring the national security of modern Russia. The identified problems involve the consideration of such key points as the definition of possible directions of the parliament’s activities to ensure national security, including through the prism of the legitimacy of the parliamentary institution itself, as well as the analysis of the features of the formation and functioning of the parliamentary system, creating difficulties in the implementation of the global task of ensuring national security. On the basis of various approaches, factors that reduce the effectiveness of parliamentary activity are analyzed, key features of institutionalization and functioning that negatively affect the perception of parliamentary institutions by society are identified. A set of measures to increase the legitimacy of parliamentarism and the effectiveness of its institutions is proposed. Attention is also paid to the problems of political responsibility of the ruling elite, concrete measures and mechanisms are proposed to improve the institution of political responsibility, which ultimately should lead to the activation of the activities of parliamentary institutions to ensure national security.

Kerimov A.A., Shebzukhova F.A., (2022), PARLIAMENTARISM IN THE SYSTEM OF ENSURING THE NATIONAL SECURITY OF MODERN RUSSIA. Sociopolitical Sciences, 1 => 21-27.

Borisov V.V. Some problems of ensuring national security in the Russian Federation and foreign experience in ensuring national security. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. Series: Law. 2020. Vol. 5. Issue 2. Pp. 64-71.
Karpysheva Y.O. On the question of the correlation of the concepts of “national security system” and “national security system”. Baikal Bulletin of DAAD. 2018. No. 1. Pp. 30-34.
Kerimov A.A. Parliamentarism in modern Russia: Features and problems of implementation. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Political Science. 2019. No. 48. Pp. 145-153.
Kovalev A.A. Parliament and society: The experience of interaction and the role of parliamentarism in the field of national security. Bulletin of the Volga Institute of Management. 2017. Vol. 17. No. 4. Pp. 4-11.
Kuznetsov I.I. Constructing democracy in the modern world: Threats of institutional borrowing. Modern Eurasian Studies. 2014. Vol. 2. Pp. 30-41.
Levada Center: Government approval [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.levada.ru/indikatory/odobrenie-organov-vlasti/
Malinova O.Y. Theory of representation and political symbolism of parliament in the Russian context. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Political Science. 2014. No. 3 (27). Pp. 5-11.
Nazarov V.P., Afinogenov D.A. Problems of the development of the general theory of national security in the context of the adjustment of the national security strategy of the Russian Federation. Power. 2020. Vol. 28. No. 1. Pp. 9-19.
Serebryanikov V. Security of Russia and its geopolitical aspects: Methodological issues of global security. Abstracts of the seminar in the framework of the research program (November 1994 - February 1995). Moscow: INION RAN, 1995. Pp. 378-383.
Timofeev L.N. Conflicts of relations between the authorities and the opposition in terms of political modernization: Risks and opportunities of their harmonization. Conflict. 2014. No. 4. Pp. 82-93.
Feofilova T.Y., Radygin E.V., Litvinenko A.N. Economic security - the strategic national priority of the Russian Federation: analysis of the new national security strategy of the Russian Federation. Bulletin of the Altai Academy of Economics and Law. 2021. No. 7-1. Pp. 83-88.
Shashkova Y.Y. Features of transit of the 90s of the XX century. as a determinant of the modern Russian political regime. News of the Altai State University. 2009. No. 4-4. Pp. 311-316.
Fiott D. On the value of parliamentary diplomacy // Madariaga Paper. 2011. Vol. 4. No. 7. Pr. 1-6.
Lippman W. US Foreign Policy: Shield of the republic. Boston: Little, Brown and Co. XIV, 1943. 177 p.
Wolfers A. Discord and collaboration: Essays on international politics. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. XVII, 1962. 283 p.

Russia, national security, parliamentarism, parliamentary institutions, legitimacy of the parliament, political responsibility.