Understanding the Phenomenon of Religion in a Cross-Cultural Context: From Cicero to Modern Youth
( Pp. 68-76)
More about authors
Arinin Evgeni I.
Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Professor; Head, Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies
Vladimdir State University named after Alexander and Nikolay Stoletovs
Vladimdir, Russian Federation Petrosyan Dmitry I. Cand. Sci. (Philos.), Associate Professor; Associate Professor at the Department of Social and Humanitarian Disciplines; Associate Professor at the Department of Sociology
Vladimir Branch of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation; Alexander Grigorievich and Nikolai Grigorievich Stoletov Vladimir State University
Vladimir, Russian Federation Tsyganov Roman V. applicant, Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies
Vladimdir State University named after Alexander and Nikolay Stoletovs
Vladimdir, Russian Federation
Vladimdir State University named after Alexander and Nikolay Stoletovs
Vladimdir, Russian Federation Petrosyan Dmitry I. Cand. Sci. (Philos.), Associate Professor; Associate Professor at the Department of Social and Humanitarian Disciplines; Associate Professor at the Department of Sociology
Vladimir Branch of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation; Alexander Grigorievich and Nikolai Grigorievich Stoletov Vladimir State University
Vladimir, Russian Federation Tsyganov Roman V. applicant, Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies
Vladimdir State University named after Alexander and Nikolay Stoletovs
Vladimdir, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The article describes some aspects of the attitude of modern student youth of two Russian regions to the concepts behind the word “religio” (religion). The latter is understood in connotation with three normative forms for the history of the Russian community: 1) as a basic spiritual and moral concept that underlies the life of every individual, the state and the entire human community as a whole (Cicero’s «religio» paradigm); 2) philosophical and confessional legal norms of the 1000-year history of Christianity in Russia; 3) the phenomenology of humanism and religious tolerance in relation to the anthropological foundations of the individual and collective life of each member of the global community. The results of a survey of 235 students from Arkhangelsk and Vladimir on issues related to the modern attitude of young people to understanding the concept of religion are also reflected.
How to Cite:
Arinin E.I., Petrosyan D.I., Tsyganov R.V., (2022), UNDERSTANDING THE PHENOMENON OF RELIGION IN A CROSS-CULTURAL CONTEXT: FROM CICERO TO MODERN YOUTH. Sociopolitical Sciences, 4 => 68-76.
Reference list:
Cole S. Cicero and the rise of deification at Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. P. 14.
Harries J. The law in Cicero s writing. In: The Cambridge Companion to Cicero by Catherine Steel. Cambridge University Press, 2013. P. 113.
Lisdorf A. The conflict over Cicero s house: An analysis of the ritual element in De domo sua // Numen. 2005. Vol. 52. P. 448.
Riggsby A.M. Brill s Post reditum speeches. In: Companion to Cicero: Oratory and rhetoric / Ed. by J.M. May. Leiden; Boston; K ln: Brill, 2002. P. 159.
Arinin E.I., Glagolev V.S., Markova N.M. Paradoxes of identity with ἄθεος and religio in religious discussions of modern Russia. Problems of Philosophy. 2021. No. 9. P. 155. (In Rus.)
Gorenshtein V.O. Introductory article. Bulletin of Ancient History. 1987. No. 1. P. 261. (In Rus.)
Markova N.M., Lyutaeva M.S. Folk religion as a phenomenon of intercultural communication: conceptualization of the concept of “native”/“vernacular”. Concept: Philosophy, Religion, Culture. 2022. Vol. 6. No. 1. Pp. 125-137. (In Rus.)
Ciceron Mark Tulliy. Speech to the people upon returning from exile. Bulletin of Ancient History. 1987. No. 1. Pp. 263, 268. (In Rus.)
Ciceron Mark Tulliy. Speeches in two volumes. Vol. II. Moscow: AN SSSR, 1962.
Shokhin V.K. Philosophy of religion and its historical forms (antiquity - the end of the 18th century). Moscow: Alfa-M, Institute of Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2010. P. 278.
Harries J. The law in Cicero s writing. In: The Cambridge Companion to Cicero by Catherine Steel. Cambridge University Press, 2013. P. 113.
Lisdorf A. The conflict over Cicero s house: An analysis of the ritual element in De domo sua // Numen. 2005. Vol. 52. P. 448.
Riggsby A.M. Brill s Post reditum speeches. In: Companion to Cicero: Oratory and rhetoric / Ed. by J.M. May. Leiden; Boston; K ln: Brill, 2002. P. 159.
Arinin E.I., Glagolev V.S., Markova N.M. Paradoxes of identity with ἄθεος and religio in religious discussions of modern Russia. Problems of Philosophy. 2021. No. 9. P. 155. (In Rus.)
Gorenshtein V.O. Introductory article. Bulletin of Ancient History. 1987. No. 1. P. 261. (In Rus.)
Markova N.M., Lyutaeva M.S. Folk religion as a phenomenon of intercultural communication: conceptualization of the concept of “native”/“vernacular”. Concept: Philosophy, Religion, Culture. 2022. Vol. 6. No. 1. Pp. 125-137. (In Rus.)
Ciceron Mark Tulliy. Speech to the people upon returning from exile. Bulletin of Ancient History. 1987. No. 1. Pp. 263, 268. (In Rus.)
Ciceron Mark Tulliy. Speeches in two volumes. Vol. II. Moscow: AN SSSR, 1962.
Shokhin V.K. Philosophy of religion and its historical forms (antiquity - the end of the 18th century). Moscow: Alfa-M, Institute of Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2010. P. 278.
Keywords:
religio, religio, religion, Cicero, morality, interpretation, student youth, Post Reditum.
