Features of State Protection Participants in Criminal Proceedings in Russian Federation
( Pp. 137-142)
More about authors
Ruslan R. Kardanov
Cand.Sci. (Law), Senior Lecturer at the Department of Internal Affairs in Special Conditions; North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; Nalchik
; Russia. Zaurbi L. Shkhagapsoev Dr. Sci. (Law), Prof., Rector
Kabardino-Balkarian State Agrarian University named after V. M. Kokov
Nalchik, Russian Federation
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; Nalchik
; Russia. Zaurbi L. Shkhagapsoev Dr. Sci. (Law), Prof., Rector
Kabardino-Balkarian State Agrarian University named after V. M. Kokov
Nalchik, Russian Federation
Abstract:
Criminal activity in the modern world is developing at a very fast pace and in practice there are situations when criminals influence participants in criminal proceedings in order to conceal the real facts regarding their criminal behavior. In this context, the mechanisms of state protection of participants in criminal proceedings are of particular importance in order to exclude various forms and methods of unlawful influence on their functioning in the framework of the relevant proceedings. The above-mentioned institution has existed in Russian criminal procedural practice not so long ago, however, a significant increase in the number of applications for state protection objectively necessitates its improvement, taking into account the existing realities. Criminal influences on various participants in criminal proceedings can significantly complicate investigative activities and negatively affect the results of the proceedings. The purpose of writing a research paper is to identify the features of the organization and implementation of a set of protective measures in relation to the participants in the proceedings. The author comes to the conclusion that the institution of state protection of participants in criminal proceedings is essential for the effectiveness of criminal proceedings in Russia. Attention is focused on the need to improve the mechanism of state protection of the aforementioned persons in the context of the dynamic development of criminal practice and the availability of many new methods of illegal influence. On the basis of the conducted scientific research, the essential features of the current institution of state protection of participants in criminal proceedings have been identified, which it seems obligatory to take into account in the further development of appropriate protective mechanisms, taking into account the transformation of the Russian criminal legal system.
How to Cite:
Ruslan R.K., Zaurbi L.S., (2021), FEATURES OF STATE PROTECTION PARTICIPANTS IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Sociopolitical Sciences, 4 => 137-142.
Reference list:
Arapova A.A., Lutsenko P.A. Problemy primeneniya mer gosudarstvennoy zashchity i obespecheniya bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo protsessa // Evraziyskiy soyuz uchenykh. 2019. № 10-3 (67). S. 31-3.
Borodkina T.N. Perspektivy razvitiya instituta gosudarstvennoy zashchity poterpevshikh, svideteley i inykh uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v Rossii // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal. 2020. № 4. S. 40-42.
Grigor eva N.V., Ugol nikova N.V., Samoroka V.A. Probely pravovogo regulirovaniya primeneniya mer bezopasnosti v otnoshenii uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Vestnik ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti. 2021. № 2. S. 126-129.
Dubonosov E.S., YAshin V.N. Teoreticheskie i pravovye problemy operativno-rozysknogo obespecheniya gosudarstvennoy zashchity uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: monografiya. Tula, 2019. 197 s.
Zaeva O.P. Institut gosudarstvennoy zashchity uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve: problemy pravoprimenitel noy praktiki // Vestnik Krasnodarskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2020. № 1 (47). S. 30-35.
Zaripov F.F. Ponyatie, vidy i algoritm primeneniya mer obespecheniya bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Vestnik Ural skogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. 2021. № 1 (29). S. 29-35.
Kiselev A.M. Voprosy pravovogo obespecheniya gosudarstvennoy zashchity uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva, soderzhashchikhsya v sledstvennykh izolyatorakh // Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. 2020. № 2 (55). S. 53-57.
Klevtsov K.K., Umrikhina E.G., Dolganova S.A. Obespechenie prav cheloveka v khode ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v Rossiyskoy Federatsii i v stranakh obshchego prava // International Law Journal. 2021. T. 4. № 4. S. 114-120.
Osmanov M.M. Problemy zashchity svideteley, uchastvuyushchikh v ugolovnom protsesse // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2021. № 3. S. 110-113.
Radzhabov R.O. Sovershenstvovanie pravovogo regulirovaniya povodov primeneniya mer gosudarstvennoy zashchity lits, sodeystvuyushchikh proizvodstvu po ugolovnomu delu // Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoy praktiki. 2018. № 4. S. 196-199.
Ramazanov T.B., Radzhabov R.O. K voprosu o kriteriyakh primeneniya mer bezopasnosti zashchishchaemykh lits v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // YUridicheskiy vestnik DGU. 2019. T. 29. № 1. S. 129-132.
Skosyrskaya YU.A. Teoretiko-metodoligicheskie osnovy izucheniya sistemy obespecheniya bezopasnosti lichnosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // CHelovecheskiy kapital. 2021. № 6 (150). S. 133-139.
Sokolov D.S. Sistema gosudarstvennoy zashchity uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: istoriya razvitiya // Teoriya i praktika rassledovaniya prestupleniy: mater. IKH Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. / Redkoll: E.S. Danil yan i dr. . Krasnodar, 2021. S. 196-199.
Singh V. Witness protection in India: The judicial Endeavour // International Journal of Advanced Research. 2016. No. 1. Pp. 367-372.
Slate Risdon N. The Federal Witness Protection Program; Its evolution and continuing growing pains // Criminal Justice Ethics (New York). 2017. No. 2. Pp. 20-34.
Borodkina T.N. Perspektivy razvitiya instituta gosudarstvennoy zashchity poterpevshikh, svideteley i inykh uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v Rossii // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal. 2020. № 4. S. 40-42.
Grigor eva N.V., Ugol nikova N.V., Samoroka V.A. Probely pravovogo regulirovaniya primeneniya mer bezopasnosti v otnoshenii uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Vestnik ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti. 2021. № 2. S. 126-129.
Dubonosov E.S., YAshin V.N. Teoreticheskie i pravovye problemy operativno-rozysknogo obespecheniya gosudarstvennoy zashchity uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: monografiya. Tula, 2019. 197 s.
Zaeva O.P. Institut gosudarstvennoy zashchity uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve: problemy pravoprimenitel noy praktiki // Vestnik Krasnodarskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2020. № 1 (47). S. 30-35.
Zaripov F.F. Ponyatie, vidy i algoritm primeneniya mer obespecheniya bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Vestnik Ural skogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. 2021. № 1 (29). S. 29-35.
Kiselev A.M. Voprosy pravovogo obespecheniya gosudarstvennoy zashchity uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva, soderzhashchikhsya v sledstvennykh izolyatorakh // Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. 2020. № 2 (55). S. 53-57.
Klevtsov K.K., Umrikhina E.G., Dolganova S.A. Obespechenie prav cheloveka v khode ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v Rossiyskoy Federatsii i v stranakh obshchego prava // International Law Journal. 2021. T. 4. № 4. S. 114-120.
Osmanov M.M. Problemy zashchity svideteley, uchastvuyushchikh v ugolovnom protsesse // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2021. № 3. S. 110-113.
Radzhabov R.O. Sovershenstvovanie pravovogo regulirovaniya povodov primeneniya mer gosudarstvennoy zashchity lits, sodeystvuyushchikh proizvodstvu po ugolovnomu delu // Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoy praktiki. 2018. № 4. S. 196-199.
Ramazanov T.B., Radzhabov R.O. K voprosu o kriteriyakh primeneniya mer bezopasnosti zashchishchaemykh lits v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // YUridicheskiy vestnik DGU. 2019. T. 29. № 1. S. 129-132.
Skosyrskaya YU.A. Teoretiko-metodoligicheskie osnovy izucheniya sistemy obespecheniya bezopasnosti lichnosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // CHelovecheskiy kapital. 2021. № 6 (150). S. 133-139.
Sokolov D.S. Sistema gosudarstvennoy zashchity uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: istoriya razvitiya // Teoriya i praktika rassledovaniya prestupleniy: mater. IKH Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. / Redkoll: E.S. Danil yan i dr. . Krasnodar, 2021. S. 196-199.
Singh V. Witness protection in India: The judicial Endeavour // International Journal of Advanced Research. 2016. No. 1. Pp. 367-372.
Slate Risdon N. The Federal Witness Protection Program; Its evolution and continuing growing pains // Criminal Justice Ethics (New York). 2017. No. 2. Pp. 20-34.
Keywords:
institution of state protection, participants in criminal proceedings, protected persons, a set of protective measures.