CRITERIA FOR THE EXECUTION OF ECHR DECISIONS: RUSSIAN AND FOREIGN EXPERIENCE
( Pp. 83-87)

The article is devoted to the study of national mechanisms for resolving conflicts related to the enforcement of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. The author analyzes the provisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and supplementary decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, in particular regarding the new control competencies of the constitutional justice body, paying particular attention to the criteria for the enforceability of decisions of the international justice body. The article also analyzes a number of additional grounds for “enforceability”. The comparative legal aspect of the problem of competition between the legal positions of the ECHR and the legal positions of the highest national courts (Great Britain, etc.)

Belosludtsev O.S., (2019), CRITERIA FOR THE EXECUTION OF ECHR DECISIONS: RUSSIAN AND FOREIGN EXPERIENCE. Sociopolitical Sciences, 5 => 83-87.

O Konstitutsionnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Feder. konstitutsion. zakon ot 21 iyulya 1994g. № 1-FKZ Elektronnyy resurs . Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tant plyus
O vnesenii izmeneniy v Federal nyy konstitutsionnyy zakon O Konstitutsionnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii : Feder. konstitutsion. zakon ot 14 dekab. 2015g. № 7-FKZ // Sobr. zak-va Ros. Federatsii. 2015. № 51 (chast I). St. 7229.
Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti ne vstupivshego v silu mezhdunarodnogo dogovora Rossiyskoy Federatsii - Protokola o prisoedinenii Rossiyskoy Federatsii k Marrakeshskomu soglasheniyu ob uchrezhdenii Vsemirnoy torgovoy organizatsii: Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Ros. Federatsii ot 09 iyulya 2012g. № 17-P Elektronnyy resurs . Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tant plyus
Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy stat i 1 Federal nogo zakona O ratifikatsii Konventsii o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod i Protokolov k ney , punktov 1 i 2 stat i 32 Federal nogo zakona O mezhdunarodnykh dogovorakh RF , chastey pervoy i chetvertoy stat i 11, punkta 4 chasti chetvertoy stat i 392 Grazhdanskogo protsessual nogo kodeksa RF, chastey 1 i 4 stat i 13, punkta 4 chasti 3 stat i 311 Arbitrazhnogo protsessual nogo kodeksa RF, chastey 1 i 4 stat i 15, punkta 4 chasti 1 stat i 350 Kodeksa administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva RF i punkta 2 chasti chetvertoy stat i 413 Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa RF v svyazi s zaprosom gruppy deputatov Gosudarstvennoy Dumy: Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Ros. Federatsii ot 14 iyulya 2015g. № 21-P Elektronnyy resurs . Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tant plyus
Po delu o razreshenii voprosa o vozmozhnosti ispolneniya v sootvetstvii s Konstitutsiey Rossiyskoy Federatsii postanovleniya Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka ot 4 iyulya 2013 goda po delu Anchugov i Gladkov protiv Rossii v svyazi s zaprosom Ministerstva yustitsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Ros. Federatsii ot 19 aprelya 2016 g. № 12-P Elektronnyy resurs . Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tant plyus
Po delu o razreshenii voprosa o vozmozhnosti ispolneniya v sootvetstvii s Konstitutsiey Rossiyskoy Federatsii postanovleniya Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka ot 31 iyulya 2014 goda po delu OAO Neftyanaya kompaniya YUKOS protiv Rossii v svyazi s zaprosom Ministerstva yustitsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Ros. Federatsii ot 19 yanv. 2017g. № 1-P Elektronnyy resurs . Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tant plyus
Postanovlenie ESPCH ot 30.01.1998. Delo Ob edinennaya kommunisticheskaya partiya Turtsii (United Communist Party of Turkey) i drugie protiv Turtsii (zhaloba N 19392/92). Elektronnyy resurs . Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tant plyus
European Court of Human Rights. Morris v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 38784/97, Judgment of 26 February 2002. URL: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng i 001-60170
European Court of Human Rights. Cooper v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 48843/99, Grand Chamber Judgment of 16 December 2003. URL: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int /eng i 001-61549
European Court of Human Rights. Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom, Applicationsnos. 26766/05 and 22228/06, Judgment of 20 January 2009. URL: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng i 001-108072
Case: Manchester City Council v Pinnock Ors 2010 UKSC 45 URL: https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/ uksc-2009-0180-judgment.pdf
Case: R v Horncastle Others 2009 UKSC 14 URL: https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2009-0073.html
Case: R v. Boyd, Hastie and Spear Saunby and Others 2002 UKHL 31 URL: https://publications.parliament.uk /pa/ld200102/ldjudgmt/jd020718/boyd-1.htm
Case: Rabone Anor v Pennine Care NHS Trust 2012 UKSC 2. URL: https://www.supremecourt.uk /cases/uksc-2010-0140.html
The Guardian. Senior judge: European court of human rights undermining democratic process. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/law/2013/nov/28/european-court-of-human-rights
Delo Gyergyulyu: Reshenie ot 14 oktyabrya 2004 goda - (№ 2 BvR 1481/04). URL: https://dpp.mpil.de/04 2015/04 2015 81 105.pdf
CHernichenko S.V. Evropeyskiy sud po prava cheloveka: problema neispolnimosti postanovleniy. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava. 2018, (3). S. 6- 17.
Luebbe-Wolff G. ECtHR and National Jurisdiction - The G rg l Case // Humboldt Forum Recht. 2006. No. 12. P. 146.

international law, domestic law, interpretation, competition of legal positions, judgments of the ECHR, criteria for enforceability, Constitutional Court, constitutional justice, constitutional review.