Transformation of traditional mechanisms for protecting the competitive environment under the influence of network economy: The place of blockchain in the regulatory system and new competitive tools (aggregators and price algorithms)
( Pp. 76-88)

This article is aimed at understanding the current state and necessity of transformation of traditional mechanisms for protecting the competitive environment under the influence of networking and the place of blockchain in the regulatory system in the context of applying new competitive tools (aggregators price algorithms) based on the experience of foreign countries, including the perspective and approaches of newest law enforcement (judicial) practice, taking into account the fact that its knowledge allowed and allows to successfully solve current problems of legal regulation in our country. The starting point of the research is network communication as a non-market type of communication. Based on analytical reflections on the information gathered from sources and literature from the list of references the author analyzes legal framework of competition protection developed in the new technological reality, takes into account the approaches of foreign countries and the Russian Federation that determine the acceptability of the application of blockchain in the field of legal protection of competition. The relevance, theoretical and practical significance of this research is due to the emergence of new tools (aggregators and price algorithms) of competitive market struggle in the light of application of a blockchain technology that might influence the competition. The author’s results are presented, among others, in the idea of the possibility of “transfer” of anti-competitive actions (price manipulation and collusion, unequal sale / distribution of information / advertising, etc. conditions) to the niche occupied by price algorithms and aggregators of information, and the need to establish a new legal framework of these new market factors.

Ksenia M.B., (2020), TRANSFORMATION OF TRADITIONAL MECHANISMS FOR PROTECTING THE COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF NETWORK ECONOMY: THE PLACE OF BLOCKCHAIN IN THE REGULATORY SYSTEM AND NEW COMPETITIVE TOOLS (AGGREGATORS AND PRICE ALGORITHMS). Sociopolitical Sciences, 5 => 76-88.

Belikova K.M. Vertikal nye soglasheniya v stranakh NAFTA. Meksika i SSHA // Konkurentsiya i pravo. 2012. № 5 (sentyabr -oktyabr ). S. 63-69.
Belikova K.M. Vertikal nye soglasheniya v stranakh NAFTA: opyt Kanady // Konkurentsiya i pravo. 2012. № 4 (iyul -avgust). S. 61-65.
Belikova K.M. Gorizontal naya dogovornaya integratsiya (khartii, dogovory o sotrudnichestve, dogovory o vzaimodeystvii) // Koordinatsiya ekonomicheskoy deyatel nosti v rossiyskom pravovom prostranstve: monografiya / A.V. Gabov, M.A. Egorova, S.D. Mogilevskiy i dr.; otv. red. d-r yurid. nauk M.A. Egorova. M.: YUstitsinform, 2015. S. 169-215 (656 s.).
Belikova K.M. Zakonodatel nye osnovy osushchestvleniya antimonopol nymi organami kontrolya za ekonomicheskimi kontsentratsiyami v stranakh MERKOSUR // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. 2008. № 5 (44). S. 16-18.
Belikova K.M. Zapret antikonkurentnogo rynochnogo povedeniya predpriyatiy v prave Venesuely // Zakon. 2008. № 2. S. 164-172.
Belikova K.M. Zloupotreblenie dominirovaniem: praktika Kanady // Konkurentsiya i pravo. 2011. № 2 (martaprel ). S. 51-56
Belikova K.M. Zloupotreblenie dominiruyushchim polozheniem v zakonodatel stve, doktrine i pravoprimenitel noy praktike Evropeyskogo Soyuza i stran YUzhnoamerikanskogo obshchego rynka - Argentiny, Brazilii i Peru // Pravo i politika. 2006. № 7 (79). S. 38-52.
Belikova K.M. Zapreshchennaya delovaya praktika i kvalifitsiruyushchie ee priznaki po pravu Venesuely // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. 2008. № 6 (45). S. 36-38.
Belikova K.M. Konkurentnaya politika SSHA na primere zapreta monopolizatsii: evolyutsiya podkhoda // Konkurentsiya i pravo. 2012. № 2 (mart-aprel ). S. 55-63.
Belikova K.M. Nedobrosovestnaya konkurentsiya po zakonodatel stvu Ispanii // Nedobrosovestnaya konkurentsiya po zakonodatel stvu zarubezhnykh gosudarstv. (Analiticheskie obzory instituta zakonodatel stva i sravnitel nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel stve RF) // ZHurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel stva i sravnitel nogo pravovedeniya. 2007. Tretiy vypusk (№ 10). S. 99-138.
Belikova K.M. Nekotorye aspekty primeneniya raspredelennykh reestrov (blokcheyn) v otnoshenii operatsiy (sdelok i pr.) s nedvizhimost yu: opyt Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2020. T. XIII. № 5 S. 074-082. DOI: 10.33693/2072-3164-2020-13-5-074-082.
Belikova K.M. Obshchaya kharakteristika monopolisticheskoy deyatel nosti predpriyatiy na rynkakh stran MERKOSUR // Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: YUridicheskie nauki. 2008. № 1. S. 48-54.
Belikova K.M. Opyt antimonopol nogo regulirovaniya v stranakh MERKOSUR // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2009. № 8. S. 97-100.
Belikova K.M. Podkhody k okhrane konkurentnoy sredy v prave Venesuely // Konstitutsiya kak osnova pravovoy sistemy gosudarstva v XXI veke: Mater. mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. Moskva, 30-31 oktyabrya 2008 g. M.: RUDN, 2009. S. 721-728 (820 s.).
Belikova K.M. Polozheniya pravovykh aktov i pravoprimenitel naya praktika o gorizontal nykh soglasheniyakh, ogranichivayushchikh torgovlyu, Evropeyskogo Soyuza i stran YUzhnoamerikanskogo obshchego rynka - Argentiny, Brazilii i Peru // ZHurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel stva i sravnitel nogo pravovedeniya. 2006. № 1. S. 31-42.
Belikova K.M. Pravovaya kvalifikatsiya gorizontal nykh soglasheniy predprinimateley v kachestve antikonkurentnykh: opyt Kanady // Novaya pravovaya mysl . 2013. № 3 (58). S. 111-116.
Belikova K.M. Pravovaya okhrana konkurentnoy sredy v stranakh MERKOSUR: Diss.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2007. S. 52-53.
Belikova K.M. Pravovye akty ob okhrane konkurentnoy sredy stran NAFTA: istoriya i sovremennost // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2014. № 1 (94). S. 26-41.
Belikova K.M. Predely dozvolennogo dominirovaniya na rynke i kontrol za sliyaniyami i priobreteniyami krupnykh partiy imushchestva v BRIKS na primere Rossii, Indii i YUzhnoy Afriki // YUrist. 2013. № 20. S. 21-26.
Belikova K.M. Sgovor kak raznovidnost monopolisticheskoy praktiki, ogranichivayushchey konkurentsiyu, v stranakh NAFTA // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2008. № 1. S. 115-126.
Belikova K.M. Ekonomika prava: istoriya, sovremennost i perspektivy: monografiya. Saarbryukken (Germaniya): LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing GmbH Co. KG. 2011. S. 52-57 (168 s.). URL: https://www.lap-publishing.com/catalog/details/store/gb/book/978-3-8465-1641-6/Eko-nomika-prava: (data obrashcheniya: 19.09.2020).
Belikova K.M., Bezbakh V.V. Zapreshchennaya delovaya praktika i kvalifitsiruyushchie ee priznaki po pravu ES i stran MERKOSUR - Argentiny, Brazilii, Urugvaya, Paragvaya, Bolivii, Peru i CHili // Pravo i politika. 2006. № 8 (80). S. 122-133.
Belikova K.M., Bezbakh V.V. Konkurentnaya politika SSHA na primere zapreta tsenovoy diskriminatsii: osnovnye polozheniya i praktika primeneniya zakona Robinsona-Petmana // YUridicheskiy mir. 2006. № 7 (115). S. 56-62; 2006. № 8 (116). S. 73-76.
Belikova K.M., Inshakova A.O. ES i MERKOSUR: obshchie vektory pravovogo regulirovaniya zashchity rynkov ot nedobro-sovestnoy konkurentsii // Konkurentnoe pravo. 2012. № 4. S. 26-31.
Blokcheyn na pike khaypa: pravovye riski i vozmozhnosti / A.YU. Ivanov (ruk. avt. koll.), M.L. Bashkatov, E.V. Galkova i dr.; Nats. issled. un-t Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki , In-t prava i razvitiya VSHE - Skolkovo. M.: Izd. dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 2017. S. 24 (237 s.).
Validatory blokcheyn-platformy Ethereum 2.0. Perspektivy i riski proekta. 26 iyunya 2020. URL: https://yandex.ru/turbo/hub.forklog.com/s/validatory-blokchejn-platformy-ethereum-2-0-perspektivy-i-riski-proekta/ (data obrashcheniya: 19.09.2020).
Vladimirskiy I. Kompaniya Maserati ob yavila strategiyu elektrifikatsii. 26 sentyabrya 2019. URL: https://autoreview.ru/news/kompaniya-maserati-ob-yavila-strategiyu-elektrifikacii (data obrashcheniya: 20.09.2020).
Gonka za 2021 god: kto est kto na rynke bespilotnykh avtomobiley. 27 apr. 2017. URL: https://vc.ru/transport/23330-the-race-to-2021 (data obrashcheniya: 20.09.2020).
ZHeltov V.V., ZHeltov M.V. Internet, protestnye dvizheniya i arabskaya vesna // Territoriya novykh vozmozhnostey. Vestnik Vladivostokskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i servisa. 2014. № 1 (24). S. 189-204.
Kazachkova Z.M. Gosudarstvennoe antimonopol noe regulirovanie v Rossii i SSHA: sravnitel no-pravovoe issledovanie: Diss.. d-ra yurid. nauk: 12.00.02. M., 2002. S. 182.
Kozhina K.E., Artyushenko D.V. TSenovye algoritmy kak instrument vedeniya biznesa: antimonopol nye riski i voprosy dopustimosti // Rossiyskoe konkurentnoe pravo i ekonomika. 2019. № 4 (20). S. 54-60. URL: http://journal.dex.ru/upload/FAS №4 2019 legkaya.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 19.09.2020).
Kuznetsova N.G. Pravovoe polozhenie agregatora informatsii o tovarakh (uslugakh, rabotakh, tsifrovom kontente) i ego preddogovornye obyazannosti // YUridicheskie issledovaniya. 2018. № 3. S. 1-15. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7136.2018.3.25508 URL: https://e-notabene.ru/lr/article 25508.html (data obrashcheniya: 19.09.2020).
Moskvin L.B. Setevizatsiya obshchestva: sotsial no-ekonomicheskiy i politicheskiy aspekty // Sotsial no-gumanitarnye znaniya. 2018. № 3. S. 47-59.
Neverov K.A. Primenenie konkurentno-kooperativnoy strategii na osnove tekhnologii blokcheyn dlya povysheniya effektivnosti upravlyaemosti. // Evraziyskaya integratsiya: ekonomika, pravo, politika. 2019. № 2. S. 33-40.
Printsip raboty YAndeks-taksi, Uber i Gett. 12 iyunya 2017. URL: https://yandex.ru/turbo text https 3A 2F 2Fvist-m.ru 2Farticles 2Fconcept 2F (data obrashcheniya: 19.09.2020).
Raspredelennyy reestr v zakone o kriptovalyutakh: chto eto na samom dele. 13 June 2018. URL: https://zen.yandex.ru/media/crypto fox/raspredelennyi-reestr-v-zakone-o-kriptovaliutah-chto-eto-na-samom-dele-5b2127f58c8be31ae43dcd9e utm source serp (data obrashcheniya: 08.09.20).
Silakov A.N. Regulirovanie tsenovykh algoritmov v SSHA i Evropeyskom Soyuze (obzor) // Referativnyy zhurnal Sotsial nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura . Ser. 4: Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2018. № 4. S. 136-141.
Eksperimental nye pravovye rezhimy: chto pro nikh nuzhno znat . 01.09.2020. https://www.klerk.ru/blogs/rosco/503872/ (data obrashcheniya: 21.09.2020).
Azizi A., Montalvo C., Espinoza B. et al. Epidemics on networks: Reducing disease transmission using health emergency declarations and peer communication. Infect Dis Model. Dec. 11, 2019. No. 5. Pp. 12-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.idm.2019.11.002. PMID: 31891014; PMCID: PMC6933230.
Belikova K.M. et al. General approaches to the market structure control in BRICS countries // Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. 2018. Vol. IX. Issue 1 (31). Pp. 96-105. DOI:10.14505//jarle.v9.1(31).13.
Belikova K.M. et al. Concept and different types of restrictive business practices in the legal orders of BRICS countries (the Case of China, India, Russia and South Africa) // Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. 2017. Vol. VIII. No. 2 (24). Pp. 404-410. DOI: 10.14505/jarle.v8.2(24).08.
Belikova K.M. Peculiarities of the legal regulation of the digital intellectual economy based on supply chain management // Int. J. Sup. Chain. Mgt. Vol. 8. No. 6. Pp. 456-461.
Bouncken R.B., Gast J., Kraus S., Bogers M. Coopetition: A systematic review, synthesis, and future research coopetition // Technovation. 2009. Vol. 29. No. 12. Pp. 819-828.
Executive Summary of the OECD hearing on Blockchain and Competition Policy. Annex to the summary record of the 129th Meeting of the competition committee held on June 6-8, 2018. June 7, 2018. DAF/COMP/M(2018)1/ANN8/FINAL. November 12, 2019. URL: https://one.oecd.org/ document/DAF/COMP/M(2018)1/ANN8/FINAL/en/pdf (data obrashcheniya: 19.09.2020).
Lewis J.B. Arbitrator s Joke Not Sufficient to Vacate Award in Putative Antitrust Class Action. August 5, 2020. URL: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx g 350e57e0-ebb9-441e-b803-8de4e414f31e : :text In 20December 202015 2C 20Spencer 20Meyer,Uber 20moved 20to 20compel 20arbitration (data obrashcheniya: 20.09.2020).
Ritala P., Hurmelinna-Laukkanen P. What s in it for Me Creating and appropriating value in innovation-related directions // Review of Managerial Science. 2015. Vol. 9. No. 3. Pp. 577-601.
Salil K. Mehra. Algorithmic collusion // How digital algorithms are manipulating consumers: Current trends (prezentatsiya uchastnika konferentsii). Pravo.ru (via Zoom). June 19, 2020.
Schuman Co. Advocates and notary. Meyer v. Kalanick - U.S. Court of Appeals rules that user of mobile app assents to terms of service by registering for an account. URL: http://schumanlaw.co.il/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/uscourtofappealsrulesthatuserofmobileappassentstotermsofservicebyregisteringforanaccount-180411141124.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 20.09.2020).
Claessens S., Dobos G., Klingebiel D., Laeven L. The growing importance of networks in finance and its effects on competition / A. Nagurney (ed.) // Innovations in Financial and Economic Networks. Edward Elgar Publishers, Northampton, MA, USA, 2003. Pp. 110-135. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Stijn Claessens/publication/240629106 6 The Growing Importance of Networks in Finance and its Eects on Competition/links/0c96052c045d62a9be000000/6-The-Growing-Importance-of-Networks-in-Finance-and-its-Eects-on-Competition.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 19.09.2020).
Ulises Montoya M. Derecho comercial. Lima, Editora y Distribuidora Jur dica Grijley. 10 edici n actualizada. 1999. T. I. P. 749.

Networking, competition, cooperation, coopetition, price algorithms, information aggregators, state-allowed factors of collaboration (cooperation, interaction) of competitors, competitors’ agreements, monopolization (dominance), abuse of dominance, blockchain.