Some aspects of legal and moral & ethical basis of euthanasia in India and South Africa (experience of the BRICS countries)
( Pp. 76-84)

More about authors
Ksenia M. Belikova Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Professor of the Department of Entrepreneurial and Corporate Law
Kutafin Moscow State Law University
Moscow, Russian Federation
Read text
Abstract:
This article is aimed at identifying of legal framework and ethical problems of euthanasia in two of the five BRICS countries belonging to the Anglo-Saxon system of law - India and South Africa. In this format, the article analyzes the approaches of these countries that create patterns of admissibility of euthanasia, its potential and ethical and legal basis for today, based on analytical reflections on the information gathered from sources and literature from the list of sources and literature. The relevance of this research is due to the fact that a number of approaches to legislation and the judicial acts under study can be useful in finding answers to similar questions related to euthanasia on our, Russian legal order. The analyzed ethical and legal experience is reflected both in historical (1986, 1996, 2011) and in new (2015, 2018) judicial acts. Thus, this study serves to fill the existing gap. The author’s results are presented in the identified partial similarity of approaches based on adherence to the Anglo-Saxon system of law, and differences in the understanding of the grounds for the permissibility of euthanasia. The theoretical and practical significance of the results obtained is determined by the fact that Russian readers will be provided with up-to-date scientific information about the state of the Indian and South African approaches in the field under study, which in practical terms will contribute to understanding the gap (or lack thereof) with the approaches of Russian researchers and practitioners (lawyers, etc.).
How to Cite:
Ksenia M.B., (2020), SOME ASPECTS OF LEGAL AND MORAL & ETHICAL BASIS OF EUTHANASIA IN INDIA AND SOUTH AFRICA (EXPERIENCE OF THE BRICS COUNTRIES). Sociopolitical Sciences, 4 => 76-84.
Reference list:
Belikova K.M. Zashchita soderzhashcheysya v patentakh nauchnoy informatsii sredstvami, predusmotrennymi pravom YUAR (podkhody stran BRIKS) // Intellektual naya sobstvennost . Promyshlennaya sobstvennost . 2019. № 8. S. 11-16.
Belikova K.M. K voprosu ob evtanazii v stranakh BRIKS: pravovye i moral no-eticheskie ramki v Brazilii, Rossii i Kitae // Pravo i politika. 2020. № 7. S. 13-34. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2020.7.33176. URL: https://nbpublish.com/library read article.php id 33176 (data obrashcheniya: 15.06.2020).
Belikova K.M. Protsessual nye aspekty zashchity nauchnoy informatsii v kontekste deystviya zakonodatel stva ob intellektual noy sobstvennosti v stranakh BRIKS: opyt Indii // Pravo i politika. 2019. № 5. S. 1-17. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2019.5.29684. URL: https://nbpublish.com/library read article.php id 29684 (data obrashcheniya: 30.05.2019).
Belikova K.M. Protsessual nye aspekty zashchity nauchnoy informatsii, soderzhashcheysya v proizvedeniyakh, okhranyaemykh avtorskim pravom, v YUAR // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. YUridicheskiy zhurnal. 2019. № 3. S. 227-236.
V YUAR za ubiystva osuzhden aktivist dvizheniya za evtanaziyu. 20 iyunya 2019 g. URL: https://regnum.ru/news/society/2651150.html (data obrashcheniya: 04.07.2020).
Vpervye v YUAR sud razreshil provesti evtanaziyu: redaktsionnaya stat ya. 5 maya 2015 g. // Foma. URL: https://foma.ru/vpervyie-v-yuar-sud-razreshil-provesti-evtanaziyu.html (data obrashcheniya: 04.07.2020).
Grazhdanskoe i semeynoe pravo razvivayushchikhsya stran: ucheb. posobie / pod red. V.K. Puchinskogo, V.V. Bezbakha. M.: Izd-vo UDN, 1989. S. 24.
Papa Frantsisk zapretil katolikam Bel gii primenyat evtanaziyu. 15 avgusta 2017 g. // CNL News. URL: https://cnl.news/365746 (data obrashcheniya: 04.07.2020).
Eks-arkhiepiskop Kenterberiyskiy vystupaet za legalizatsiyu evtanazii / per. s angl. Datsko D. 14 marta 2017 g. // CNL News. URL: https://cnl.news/364140 (data obrashcheniya: 04.07.2020).
YUAR: debaty ob evtanazii ozhivilis posle zayavleniya anglikanskogo arkhiepiskopa. 14 oktyabrya 2016 g. // CNL News. URL: https://cnl.news/362686 (data obrashcheniya: 04.07.2020).
Karola A. How can one become chief medical officer in India June 28, 2017. URL: https://www.quora.com/How-can-one-become-chief-medical-officer-in-India (data obrashcheniya: 03.07.2020).
After 36 years of immobility, a fresh hope of death. The Indian Express: New Delhi. 17 2009. URL: http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/after-36-yrs-of-immobility-a-fresh-hope-of/555048 (data obrashcheniya: 03.07.2020).
Narayan A. Fundamentals of Criminal Procedure Code. June 16, 2016. https://blog.ipleaders.in/fundamentalscriminal-procedure-code/ (data accesses: 28.04.2019).
Culpable Homicide and Murder. Editorial. Law Times Journal. June 25, 2019. URL: https://lawtimesjournal.in/culpablehomicide-and-murder/ (data obrashcheniya: 04.07.2020).
India allows living wills for terminally ill. March 9, 2018. URL: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-43341155 (data obrashcheniya: 04.07.2020) i dr.
Erasmus L. In South African law, what is culpable homicide March 28, 2017. URL: https://www.quora.com/In-South- African-law-what-is-culpable-homicide (data obrashcheniya: 04.07.2020).
Magnier M. India s Supreme Court lays out euthanasia guidelines. Los Angeles Times. March 8, 2011. URL: https://www.latimes.com/world/la-xpm-2011-mar-08-la-fg-indiaeuthanasia-20110308-story.html (data obrashcheniya: 03.07.2020).
Kasturi M. Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug vs. Union of India: Case analysis. January 7, 2015. URL: https://www.lawctopus.com/academike/aruna-ramchandra-shanbaug-v-union-of-india-case-analysis/ (data obrashcheniya: 13.07.2020).
Murder vs. Culpable Homicide. 7, 2016. URL: https://www. clatapult.com/murder-v-culpable-homicide/ (data obrashcheniya: 04.07.2020).
Sareen R. India Decides on Euthanasia: Is the Debate Over Health Care Current Reviews. 2019. No. 7. P. 245. DOI: 10.35248/2375-4273.19.7.245. URL: https://www.longdom.org/open-access/india-decides-on-euthanasia-is-the-debate-over-44121.html (data obrashcheniya: 03.07.2020).
Supreme Court Reports 2012 1 S.C.R. 1.
Gopal V. When attempt to end life is the start of more problems. Mental Health Care Bill decriminalises suicide attempts but treats it as a mental health issue. January 5, 2014 (updated June 2, 2016). URL: https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/bangalore/when-attempt-to-end-life-is-the-start-of-more-problems/article5539179.ece : :text The 20Bombay 20High 20Court 20had,to 20live 20a 20forced 20life. (data obrashcheniya: 03.07.2020).
Keywords:
BRICS, India, South Africa, euthanasia, assisted suicide, key precedents, judicial acts, criminal codes.