Comparative legal analysis of the breach of duties of the juvenile person upbringing in the criminal law systems of Russia and individual foreign countries
( Pp. 159-167)

Objectives: Particular issues of comparative analysis of the liability regulation for the breach of duties of the juvenile person upbringing in the criminal law systems of Russia and foreign countries are relevant to the theory and practice of criminal law. This reason is conditioned by the need of their in-depth study so as to improve Russian criminal legislation and to extend the practical application of the criminal law norms specified in the Article 156 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation as well as to implement its preventive potential. Research methodology: Comparative legal study of the main categories and concepts used to accurately and correctly determine the constructive signs of the investigated criminal encroachment is done by dialectical, comparative, technical and logical methods. Summary: The article reveals the provisions on the specifics of the qualification of personal actions that consists in breach of duties of the juvenile person upbringing under the Russian criminal code. This reason demands a competent scientific and legal assessment upon the experience of their legal regulation in the norms of foreign criminal law. Conducted comparative analysis of criminal legislation, a synthesis of the views of individual scientists-lawyers are allowed to form a holistic view of the institution of responsibility for committing a crime under article 156 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and to identify the main problems that show up at the constructive tagging of this act. Within the framework of this article, a change of the norm wording of the Article 156 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation would be justified by the need to implement the particular provisions of the criminal legislation of individual foreign countries. Therefore, this action will help to increase the effectiveness of its application. Significance: The research provisions can be used for teaching of criminal law courses and for practical implementation of criminal nature of the offense.

Pomnina S.N., Ogrina M.V., (2020), COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE BREACH OF DUTIES OF THE JUVENILE PERSON UPBRINGING IN THE CRIMINAL LAW SYSTEMS OF RUSSIA AND INDIVIDUAL FOREIGN COUNTRIES. Sociopolitical Sciences, 6 => 159-167.

Belov V.F. Osobennosti kvalifikatsii neispolneniya obyazannostey po vospitaniyu nesovershennoletnego po deystvuyushchemu Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Sledovatel . 2006. № 3. S. 2-4.
Borsuchenko S.A. Sistema nakazaniy po Ugolovnomu kodeksu Ispanii // Ugolovno-ispolnitel noe pravo. 2017. T. 12 (1-4). № 3. S. 336-341.
Bychkova A. Ugolovno-pravovaya kharakteristika stat i 156 UK RF // Vestnik Ekspertnogo soveta pri Upolnomochennom po pravam rebenka v Irkutskoy oblasti. 2014. № 6. S. 14-24.
Golubykh N.V., Zapadnova YU.A. Voprosy kvalifikatsii, voznikayushchie pri otsenke stepeni obshchestvennoy opasnosti deyaniya, predusmotrennogo stat ey 156 ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Vestnik Ural skogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. 2016. № 2. S. 5-9.
Morua A. Pis ma neznakomke / per. s fr. YA. Lesyuka. M.: AST, 2016. 224 s.
Nagornaya I.I. ZHestokoe obrashchenie s rebenkom kak otsenochnoe ugolovno-pravovoe ponyatie // Pravo. ZHurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. 2017. № 2. S. 142-154.
Narozhnyaya O.V. Osobennosti kvalifikatsii prestupleniy v otnoshenii sem i i nesovershennoletnikh po deystvuyushchemu Ugolovnomu kodeksu RF // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2008. № 20. S. 20-22.
Plenkova K.A. Neispolnenie obyazannostey po vospitaniyu nesovershennoletnego: aktual nye problemy teorii i praktiki // Nauchno-prakticheskiy elektronnyy zhurnal Alleya Nauki. 2018. № 11 (27).
Profilaktika nasiliya i zhestokogo obrashcheniya s det mi. Profilaktika emotsional nogo vygoraniya spetsialistov: metod. posobie / M.A. Berezina, R.R. Muslumov, N.A. Tomina, N.G. TSerkovnikova (sost.: psikhologi-trenery). Ekaterinburg, 2020. 232 s.
Sukhomlinskiy V.A. Serdtse otdayu detyam. M.: Kontseptual, 2018. 320 s.
SHaganova O.M. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za neispolnenie obyazannostey po vospitaniyu nesovershennoletnego // Vestnik Barnaul skogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. 2012. № 1 (22). S. 98-100.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Respubliki Bolgariya / nauch. red. A.I. Lukashova; per. s bolg. D.V. Milusheva, A.I. Lukashova. SPb.: YUrid. tsentr Press, 2001. 291 c.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Gruzii: Zakon Gruzii ot 22 iyulya 1999 g. № 2287 // Zakonodatel nyy Vestnik Gruzii - ZVG. 1999. № 41 (48).
Ugolovnyy kodeks Danii / nauch. red. S.S. Belyaev; per. s dat. S.S. Belyaeva i A.N. Rychevoy. SPb.: YUrid. tsentr Press, 2001. 228 s.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Ispanii / pod red. i s predisl. N.F. Kuznetsova, F.M. Reshetnikov; per.: V.P. Zyryanova, L.G. SHnayder. M.: Zertsalo, 1998. 218 c.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Latviyskoy Respubliki / nauch. red.: A.I. Lukashov (per. s lat.), E.A. Sarkisova. SPb.: YUrid. tsentr Press, 2001. 313 c.
Ugolovnoe zakonodatel stvo Norvegii / per. s norv. A.V. ZHmeni; nauch. red. i vstup. st. YU.V. Golik. SPb.: YUrid. tsentr Press, 2003. 375 c.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Frantsii / nauch. red. L.V. Golovko, N.E. Krylova; per. s frants. i predisl. N.E. Krylovoy. SPb.: YUrid. tsentr Press, 2002. 650 c.
Ugolovnyy kodeks SHveytsarii. perevod s nemetskogo / nauch. red. A.V. Serebryannikova (per., predisl.). SPb.: YUrid. tsentr Press, 2002. 350 c.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Estonskoy Respubliki / Assots. YUrid. tsentr ; red. V.V. Zapevalov. SPb.: YUridicheskiy tsentr Press, 2001. 260 s.

breach of duties, upbringing, juvenile person, abuse.