Political pluralism: Notion, conceptual and interpretative foreshortening
( Pp. 32-37)

In order to reveal the content of political pluralism, the article considers conceptual, conceptual and interpretative approaches to its definition in the context of constitutional relations with the foundations of the constitutional system, constitutional values, freedom of speech and expression. It is revealed that the absence of the term “political pluralism” in the constitutional text of Russia is made up for by its disclosure through the interpretation of the related principles of “ideological diversity”, “political diversity” and “multiparty”. It is this perspective of the study of political pluralism that helps to justify it as the basis of the constitutional system of Russia. It is noted that since freedom of speech and expression are associated primarily with political freedoms, they are most logically associated with political pluralism. It is proved that the latter implies the presence of citizens in society who have their own interests, adhere to different views on the development of the state and society and unite on this basis in groups, as well as finding a compromise between them based on common ideals and values when solving issues of national importance. The analysis of the motivational part of the decisions of the constitutional Court of the Russian Federation served to reveal the content of political pluralism. The authors concluded that the structure of political pluralism consists of political diversity, freedom of speech, freedom of expression, and political compromise. As a generalization, the authors noted that the principle of political pluralism is revealed by this body through guarantees of political diversity and the possibility of finding a compromise of political interests at the level of the Parliament. In addition, it was stressed that the principle of political diversity in a democratic state is ensured through the functioning of such institutions of direct democracy as freedom of speech, free elections, freedom of peaceful public events, the right to Association and freedom of their activities, including political parties. It is concluded that the coordination of political interests should be provided by parliaments of various levels.

Gelunenko V.V., Andreev S.D., (2020), POLITICAL PLURALISM: NOTION, CONCEPTUAL AND INTERPRETATIVE FORESHORTENING. Sociopolitical Sciences, 4 => 32-37.

Gazizov R.F. Politicheskiy plyuralizm kak uslovie dostizheniya obshchestvennogo ideala // Sotsial no-gumanitarnye znaniya. 2012. № 10. S. 129-134.
Gelunenko V.V. Konstitutsionnaya formalizatsiya svobody slova v konstitutsiyakh gosudarstv Vostochnoy Evropy // Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo federal nogo universiteta im. V.I. Vernadskogo. YUridicheskie nauki. 2018. № 4. S. 333-337.
Demidov A.I. Politika: ponyatie i priroda // Rossiyskaya pravovaya politika: kurs lektsiy / pod red. d-ra yurid. nauk, prof. N.I. Matuzova i d-ra yurid. nauk, prof. A.V. Mal ko. M. 2003.
Didikin A.B. Rol pravovykh pozitsiy Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF v razvitii nauki konstitutsionnogo prava i konstitutsionno-pravovoy doktriny // Sovremennoe pravo. 2008. № 11. S. 65-67.
Kuksin I.N., SHukhov F.G. Popravki k Konstitutsii Rossii v fokuse obshchestvennykh ob edineniy // Nauka i obrazovanie: khozyaystvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel stvo; pravo i upravlenie. 2020. № 5 (120). S. 65-69.
Markhgeym M.V. Pravo na obzhalovanie sudebnogo resheniya v traktovke Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. № 12 (144). 2016. S. 35-38.
Markhgeym M.V. Pravo na protest: konstitutsionnyy abris sobiratel nogo obraza // Nauka i obrazovanie: khozyaystvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel stvo; pravo i upravlenie. № 3. 2016. S. 29-31.
Markhgeym M.V. TSennosti: ot konstituirovannoy mudrosti do konstitutsionnoy normy // Nauka i obrazovanie: khozyaystvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel stvo; pravo i upravlenie. 2020. № 5 (120). S. 70-73.
Markhgeym M.V., Andreev S.D. Politicheskiy plyuralizm v ryadu osnov konstitutsionnogo stroya Rossii // Nauka i obrazovanie: khozyaystvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel stvo; pravo i upravlenie. 2019. № 12 (115). S. 59-62.
Markhgeym M.V., Gelunenko V.V. Samozashchita i svoboda slova: resursy konstitutsionno-pravovogo simbioza // Nauka i obrazovanie: khozyaystvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel stvo; pravo i upravlenie. 2017. № 2. S. 85-87.
Nudnenko L.A. K voprosu o balanse publichnykh i chastnykh interesov v pravovom regulirovanii vstrech deputatov s izbiratelyami // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2019. № 4. S. 85-91.
Ozhegov S.I. Slovar russkogo yazyka. Izd-e 4-e, ispr. i dop. M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel stvo inostrannykh i natsional nykh slovarey. 1960.
Slovar inostrannykh slov: bolee 21 000 slov / otv. red. V.V. Burtseva, N.M. Semenova. 4-e izd., stereotip. M.: Rus. yaz. Media. 2007. 817 s.
Stus N.V. Konstitutsionnye tsennosti: proverka sudebnoy reformoy // V sb.: Konstitutsiya - tsennostno-normativnaya osnova razvitiya prav cheloveka i grazhdanina v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Krasnodar, 2019. S. 78-81.
Troyan V.A. Konstitutsionnoe zakreplenie garantiy sub ektivnogo izbiratel nogo prava: opyt stran SNG // Nauka i obrazovanie: khozyaystvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel stvo; pravo i upravlenie. 2020. № 5 (120). S. 74-79.
Ebzeev B.S. Konstitutsionnyy Sud Rossiyskoy Federatsii: stanovlenie, yuridicheskaya priroda, pravovye pozitsii // Kommentariy k Postanovleniyam Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF. T. 1. Vstupitel naya stat ya. M., 2000. S. 24-25.

political pluralism, political diversity, freedom of speech, decisions of the constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, legal positions, constitutional values, Parliament.