PROBLEMS OF UNDERSTANDING THE BASIS OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF ACCOMPLICES
( Pp. 44-47)

The main function of the institution of complicity in a crime is the possibility of imposing criminal responsibility on persons who were not directly involved in the execution of the objective side of the relevant offense, but objectively facilitating the commission of a crime criminal responsibility for individual criminal activity. For these reasons, in this article the author sets as his task the definition of the basis of criminal responsibility of the accomplices in a crime. The methodological basis of the study is the synthesis method, the system-structural method and the analogy of the analyzed criminal law norms. In writing the work also used various types of interpretation of law rules. The normative base of the study consisted of the rule on the basis of criminal responsibility, as well as the rules of the institution of complicity in a crime. The theoretical base of the research consists of doctrinal development of the complicity in a crime. The results of the study allowed us to form an idea of complicity in a crime as a special holistic system, the criminal influence of which on the object of criminal encroachment is the basis of the criminal responsibility of the participants in the crime. The theoretical significance of the study is to eliminate the contradictions in the theory of criminal law regarding the understanding of the basis of the criminal liability of accomplices, as well as the rationale for the admissibility of the association of the underlying accomplices in the criminal law of the accessory principle and the principle of independent liability.

Subachev A.K., (2018), PROBLEMS OF UNDERSTANDING THE BASIS OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF ACCOMPLICES. Sociopolitical Sciences, 6 => 44-47.

Avetisyan S.S. K probleme kontseptsii smeshannoy teorii otvetstvennosti souchastnikov prestupleniya // Prokurorskaya i sledstvennaya praktika. 2004. № 1-2. S. 198-213.
Arutyunov A.A. Sistemnyy podkhod k obshchey teorii souchastiya v prestuplenii: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2001. 180 s.
Burchak F.G. Souchastie: sotsial nye, kriminologicheskie i pravovye problemy. Kiev: Vishcha shkola, 1986. 208 s.
Grishaev P.I., Kriger G.A. Souchastie po ugolovnomu pravu / P.I. Grishaev, G.A. Kriger. - M.: Gosyurizdat, 1959. -255 s.
Kovalev, M.I. Souchastie v prestuplenii: ponyatie souchastiya. Uchenye trudy. CH. 1 / M.I. Kovalev; pod red. M.A. Efimova. Sverdlovsk, 1960. 288 s.
Piontkovskiy A.A. Uchenie o prestuplenii po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava: Obshchaya chast . M.: Gosyurizdat, 1961. 666 s.
Pushkin, A.A. Printsipy aktsessornoy i samostoyatel noy otvetstvennosti souchastnikov prestupleniya / A.A. Pushkin // Zakonnost . 2001. № 3. S. 27-30.
Traynin A.N. Izbrannye trudy / A.N. Traynin. Sostavlenie, vstupitel naya stat ya dokt. yurid. nauk, professora N.F. Kuznetsovoy. - SPb.: Izdatel stvo YUridicheskiy tsentr Press , 2004. 898 s.
SHargorodskiy M.D. Izbrannye trudy / M.D. SHargorodskiy; sost. i predislovie dokt. yurid. nauk, prof. B.V. Volzhenkina. SPb.: Izdatel stvo YUridicheskiy tsentr Press . 2004. 684 s.
Entsiklopediya ugolovnogo prava. T. 6. Souchastie v prestuplenii. / S.S. Avetisyan i dr. . 2-e izd. SPb.: Izd. professora Malinina, 2007. 564 c.