The concept of criminalistic doctrine on the implementation of special knowledge outside the forensic expertise
( Pp. 128-136)

More about authors
Zhdanov Sergey P. Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Corresponding Member of the Academy of Military Sciences; Associate Professor of Civil Law Disciplines Department; Associate Professor of Customs Law and Customs Affairs Organization Department; Associate Professor of Constitutional and Municipal Law Department
Russian Economics University named after G.V. Plekhanov; Russian university of transport; Moscow State Regional University
Moscow, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The article is devoted to the formation of a system of theoretical provisions that form the concept of forensic doctrine on the implementation of special knowledge outside forensic expertise (hereinafter - the Doctrine). With regard to the proposed Doctrine, the article reveals its following elements: the objective existence of the object of knowledge in the form of social relations arising from the implementation of special knowledge outside the forensic examination, and the identification of a set of elements that form the subject of knowledge; principles of the Doctrine; scientifically grounded goals, objectives and functions of the Doctrine; formed methods of the Doctrine; developed structure and content of the Doctrine; features of interaction and interrelation of the Doctrine and particular forensic theories (doctrines), sciences, etc. On the basis of the conducted independent scientific research, the author, under the forensic doctrine of the implementation of special knowledge outside forensic expertise, proposes to understand the branch of the section of forensic science, called the general theory of criminalistics, investigates the patterns of using special knowledge outside forensic expertise in the disclosure and investigation of crimes and develops methods and means of attracting persons possessing special knowledge, as well as the collection, research and use of their own and other special knowledge in legal proceedings.
How to Cite:
Zhdanov S.P., (2021), THE CONCEPT OF CRIMINALISTIC DOCTRINE ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OUTSIDE THE FORENSIC EXPERTISE. Sociopolitical Sciences, 4 => 128-136.
Reference list:
Aver yanova T.V. Sudebnaya ekspertiza. Kurs obshchey teorii. M.: Norma; INFRA-M, 2014.
Bachilo I.L. Funktsii organov upravleniya (pravovye problemy oformleniya i realizatsii). M.: YUrid. lit-ra, 1976.
Bezrukov S.S. Printsipy ugolovnogo protsessa: Dis. d-ra yurid. nauk: 12.00.09. M., 2016.
Belkin R.S. Kriminalisticheskaya entsiklopediya. 2-e izd., dop. M.: Megatron XXI, 2000.
Belkin R.S. Kurs kriminalistiki: ucheb. posobie dlya vuzov. 3-e izd., dop. M.: YUNITI-DANA; Zakon i pravo, 2001.
Belkin R.S. Kriminalistika: problemy segodnyashnego dnya. Zlobodnevnye voprosy rossiyskoy kriminalistiki. M.: Norma; INFRA-M, 2001.
Volynskiy A.F. Differentsiatsiya kriminalisticheskikh znaniy i sovremennye problemy kriminalistiki // Sovremennoe razvitie kriminalistiki i sudebnoy ekspertizy kak realizatsiya idey R.S. Belkina: Mater. Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. K 95-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya uchenogo, pedagoga, publitsista (Moskva, 22-23 noyabrya 2017 g.). M.: RG-Press, 2018.
Gegel G.V.F. Filosofiya prava / per. s nem. M.: Mysl , 1990.
Golovanov A.A. Kriminalisticheskoe obespechenie administrativnogo rassledovaniya: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.09. Kaliningrad, 2005.
Grinenko A.V. Sistema printsipov ugolovnogo protsessa i ee realizatsiya na dosudebnykh stadiyakh: Avtoref. dis. d-ra yurid. nauk: 12.00.09. Voronezh, 2001.
D yakonova O.G. Predmet nauki Sudebnaya ekspertologiya // Materialy 5-y Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii Teoriya i praktika sudebnoy ekspertizy v sovremennykh usloviyakh (Moskva, 22-23 yanvarya 2015 g.). M.: Prospekt, 2015.
ZHdanov S.P. Uchastie spetsialista v sudoproizvodstve i operativno-rozysknoy deyatel nosti: postanovka problem: preprint monografii / preduvedomlenie A.YU. SHumilova. M.: ID SHumilovoy I.I., 2014.
ZHdanov S.P. O formirovanii spetsiologii kak novogo napravleniya v yuridicheskikh naukakh / // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. YUrid. zhurnal. 2014. № 5.
ZHdanov S.P. K voprosu o printsipakh uchastiya spetsialista v sudoproizvodstve i operativno-rozysknoy deyatel nosti // Vestnik Akademii prava i upravleniya. 2015. № 1 (38).
ZHdanov S.P. Uchenie o spetsiologii // Voennoe pravo. 2020. № 4 (62).
ZHizhina M.V. Teoriya i praktika primeneniya sovremennoy kriminalistiki v tsivilisticheskom protsesse: Dis. d-ra yurid. nauk: 12.00.12. M., 2017.
Zinin A.M. Uchastie spetsialista v protsessual nykh deystviyakh: uchebnik. M.: Prospekt, 2014.
Zorin G.A. Teoreticheskie osnovy kriminalistiki. Minsk: Amalfeya, 2000. (Fundamental naya kriminalistika XXI veka).
Isaeva L.M. Printsip upravleniya kachestvom ispol zovaniya spetsial nykh znaniy v deyatel nosti pravookhranitel nykh organov // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. YUrid. zhurnal. 2019. № 3.
Karpets I.I. CHto takoe kriminologiya. M.: Znanie, 1986.
Kartashov V.N. Printsipy prava // Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: uchebnik / pod red. V.K. Babaeva. M.: YUrist , 2005.
Korukhov YU.G., Orlova V.F. Znachenie obshchey teorii dlya razvitiya instituta sudebnoy ekspertizy // Aktual nye problemy sudebnoy ekspertizy i kriminalistiki. Kiev, 1993.
Kurs kriminalistiki. Obshchaya chast / otv. red. V.E. Kornoukhov. M.: YUrist , 2000.
Kurs kriminalistiki: V 3-kh t. T. I: Obshcheteoreticheskie voprosy. Kriminalisticheskaya tekhnika. Kriminalisticheskaya taktika / pod red. O.N. Korshunovoy, A.A. Stepanova. SPb.: YUridicheskiy tsentr Press, 2004.
Mozhaeva I.P. Kontseptual nye osnovy kriminalisticheskogo ucheniya ob organizatsii rassledovaniya prestupleniy // Trudy Akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii. 2016. № 4 (40).
Nesterov A.V. Ekspertika: obshchaya teoriya ekspertizy. M.: NIU VSHE, 2014.
Rossinskaya E.R. Ponyatie sudebnoy ekspertologii i ee sistema // Sudebno-ekspertnaya deyatel nost : pravovoe, teoreticheskoe i organizatsionnoe obespechenie: uchebnik dlya aspirantury po spetsial nosti 12.00.12 Kriminalistika; sudebno-ekspertnaya deyatel nost ; operativno-rozysknaya deyatel nost / pod red. E.R. Rossinskoy, E.I. Galyashinoy. M.: Norma; INFRA-M, 2017.
Rossinskaya E.R. Ponyatie sudebnoy ekspertologii i ee sistema // Sudebnaya ekspertologiya: istoriya i sovremennost (nauchnaya shkola, ekspertnaya praktika, kompetentnostnyy podkhod): monografiya / pod red. E.R. Rossinskoy, E.I. Galyashinoy. M.: Prospekt, 2017.
Rossinskaya E.R., Galyashina E.I., Zinin A.M. Teoriya sudebnoy ekspertizy (Sudebnaya ekspertologiya): uchebnik / pod red. E.R. Rossinskoy. 2-e zd., pererab. i dop. M.: Norma; INFRA-M, 2017.
Sichivitsa O.M. Metody i formy nauchnogo poznaniya. M., 1972.
Starovich Z. Sudebnaya seksologiya / per. s pol sk. M.: YUrid. lit-ra, 1991.
Sorokotyagin I.N., Sorokotyagina D.A. Sudebnaya ekspertologiya - sovremennyy etap v razvitii sudebnoy ekspertizy i ekspertnogo prava // Sovremennoe razvitie kriminalistiki i sudebnoy ekspertizy kak realizatsiya idey R.S. Belkina: Mater. Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. K 95-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya uchenogo, pedagoga, publitsista (Moskva, 22-23 noyabrya 2017 g.). M.: RG-Press, 2018.
Keywords:
conceptual framework, specialist, forensic science, criminality training on the implementation of specialized knowledge outside forensic expertise, interdisciplinary scientific research, operational-search activity, specialized knowledge, special knowledge, specialty, judicial proceedings.


Related Articles

1. SCIENTIFIC SCHOOL OF DOCTOR OF SCIENCE, PROFESSOR SHCHERBA SERGEJ PETROVICH Pages: 16-18 Issue №9149
PROBLEMATIC ISSUES OF RELATION BETWEEN EXPERT CONCLUSION AND SPECIALIST OPINION
special knowledge procedural forms of using special knowledge opinion and expert testimony conclusion and testimony of a specialist
Show more
CRIMINAL PROCESS (12.00.09) Pages: 304-307 Issue №19269
On Some Problems of Using Special Knowledge in Investigating Crimes
special knowledge specialist expert opinion crime investigation criminal procedure
Show more
13. FORENSICS; FORENSIC EXPERTISE; OPERATIONAL AND SEARCH ACTIVITIES (12.00.12) Pages: 270-276 DOI: 10.33693/2072-3164-2021-14-3-270-276 Issue №18933
Conceptual Foundations of the Private Theory of Forensic Economic Expertise
specialist participation specialized knowledge forensic activity preliminary research specialist consultation
Show more
14. FORENSICS; FORENSIC EXPERTISE; OPERATIONAL AND SEARCH ACTIVITIES 12.00.12 Pages: 318-321 Issue №17564
Subject, objects and tasks of forensic examination of intellectual property objects
forensic science forensic examination special knowledge patents trademarks
Show more
public law (state law) Pages: 310-316 Issue №23752
Collecting Reliable and Admissible Evidence in Tax Process by Engaging Specialist
specialist conclusion means of proof tax process evidence.
Show more
15. Criminal procedure Pages: 239-246 Issue №12273
THE RIGHT OF THE ADVOCATE-DEFENDER TO RECEPTION OPINION OF A SPECIALIST AND ITS PRESENTATION TO SUBJOIN TO THE MATERIALS OF THE CRIMINAL CASE: GUARANTEE AND PROBLEMS OF IMPLEMENTATION
criminal proceedings defense attorney specialist expert opinion expert
Show more
7. Forensics; Forensic expertise; Operational and search activities Pages: 222-225 Issue №4539
ON THE FORMATION SPETSIOLOGII AS A NEW DIRECTION IN JURISPRUDENCE
speleologia specialist special knowledge special knowledge ekspertika
Show more
7. Forensics; Forensic expertise; Operational and search activities Pages: 230-232 Issue №4539
Possibility of Using the Results of Special Psychophysiological Researches and Forensic Examination of Individuals with the Signs of Simulation and Aggravation of Somatic Illnesses
special knowledge psychophysiological study using polygraph a forensic examination
Show more
3. CRIMINALISTIC, PROCEDURAL AND OPERATIVE-SEARCH MEASURES TO COUNTER CRIME IN THE GLOBALIZATION CONDITIONS Pages: 251-254 Issue №16988
Current issues of using special knowledge in the investigation of violent crimes
special knowledge expertise research specialist traces
Show more
16. OTHER Pages: 239-243 Issue №5902
TYPES OF LINGUISTIC EXPERT EXAMINATION IN JURISPRUDENCE: PURPOSE AND RESULTS
linguistic expertise special knowledge judicial speech study defense in court the rule of law
Show more