Analysis of the Formation of the Subsystem of International Relations in Northeast Asia from the Point of View of the Civilizational Approach. Part 1
( Pp. 162-168)

The purpose and objectives. The purpose of the article is to analyze the formation of the subsystem of international relations in Northeast Asia from the point of view of the civilizational approach. The following tasks are being solved: the study of the configuration of the acting forces of the superethnic level and the activity of non-ethnic systems of the subsystem of international relations in Northeast Asia and the compilation of the periodization of models of international relations on the cross-section of the ethnosphere in this region. Methodological approach. The methodology of L.N. Gumilev is the main one in the work, as well as the systematic approach developed in Oriental political science by A.D. Voskresensky, general scientific methods of cognition and the comparative historical method are also used. Results and conclusions. The article proposes the author’s periodization of models of international relations on the cross-section of the ethnosphere in Northeast Asia from the point of view of the civilizational approach. Originality and value. The research is valuable in view of its relevance and originality of the work, which focuses on obtaining new knowledge about the configuration of the acting forces of the superethnic level and the activity of non-ethnic systems of the subsystem of international relations in Northeast Asia and about the periodization of models of international relations in the ethnosphere in this region.

Nikiforov S.V., (2022), ANALYSIS OF THE FORMATION OF THE SUBSYSTEM OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS IN NORTHEAST ASIA FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE CIVILIZATIONAL APPROACH. PART 1. Sociopolitical Sciences, 4 => 162-168.

Abaev N.V. Influence of Tengrian ideology on social organization and statehood in the Xiongnu and Mongols Empires: some methodological aspects. Bulletin of the Buryat State University. 2013. No. 6. Pp. 134- 141. (In Rus.)
Bazarov B.V. Military-administrative organization of the Mongol Empire. Vlast. 2015. No. 02. Pp.168-172. (In Rus.)
Bichurin N.Ya. (Yakinf). Collection of information about the peoples who lived in Central Asia in ancient times. Moscow; Leningrad: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Institute of Ethnography named after Miklouho-Maclay, 1950. Vol. 1. 471 p.; Vol. 2. 335 p.
Vasiliev L.S. History of the religions of the East. Confucianism and legalism [Electronic resource]. 2000. URL: https://abhidharma.ru/A/Raznoe/0043.pdf
Gumilyov L.N. Ancient Turks. Ch. XIII: Birth of the Tang Empire [Electronic resource]. 1999. URL: http://www.gumilevica.kulichki.net/OT/ot13.htm
Gumilyov L.N. Ancient Turks. Ch. XXIV: Blue Turks about themselves [Electronic resource]. 1999. URL: http://www.gumilevica.kulichki.net/OT/ot24.htm
Dumoulin H. History of Zen Buddhism. Translit. from English by Yu.V. Bondareva. 2003. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://abhidharma.ru/A/Simvol/Dzen/History%20Dzen.pdf
Karamazov V.D. Religious syncretism in China [Electronic resource]. 2014. URL: https://history.wikireading.ru/409163
Kozinets A.I. Confucian order in East Asia: Significance for the theory of international relations. Oikumena. 2016. No. 2. Pp. 106-122. (In Rus.)
Lipovtseva E.M. Modification of the meanings of China’s self-names - from pre-Confucian philosophy to the teachings of Confucius. Bulletin of the Tomsk State University. 2007. No. 303. Pp. 25-28. (In Rus.)
Meliksetov A.V. History of China. China under the rule of the Mongol Empire [Electronic resource]. 2002. URL: https://history.wikireading.ru/96292
Mikhalevich S.S. The early stage of wokou activity in China and Korea. Achievements of Science and Education. 2018. No. 7 (29). Vol. 1. Pp. 29-31. (In Rus.)
Nezhenets N.I., Nezhenets A.N., Reutskaya E.M. Cathedral Russia in a figurative word, or the skill of artistry: Monograph. Moscow: Raritet, 2011. Pp. 245-246.
Ososkov G.V. The official ideology of the Russian Empire of the XIX century “Orthodoxy-Autocracy-Nationality” (social and philosophical analysis). In: Russia: Trends and development prospects. Yearbook. INION RAN. 2017. Pp. 659-662.
Tengrianism is the religion of the Turks. Modern Eurasianism. Lev Gumilyov Center in Kyrgyzstan [Electronic resource]. 2013. URL: http://su.gumilev-center.ru/tengrianstvo-religiya-tyurkov/
Khaltaeva O.R. The concept of government of the legists and the doctrine of the sky in the period of Chunqiu and Zhangguo. Bulletin of the Buryat State University. 2015. Issue 14. Pp. 9-13. (In Rus.)
Zou Hong. The influence of the Confucian idea of the Li ritual on the ideology and culture of the peoples of Korea and Japan. Humanitarian Vector. 2009. No. 4. Pp. 92-97. (In Rus.)
Shagdar Bira. The Mongolian ideology of Tengrism and Kublai Khan. Golden Horde Review. 2013. No. 1. Pp. 36-44. (In Rus.)

ethnopolitical system, superethnic level, nonethnic systems, ethnosphere, periodization of models of international relations, subsystem of international relations in Northeast Asia.