DIVERSITY OF VIEWS ON THE SCIENTIFIC, CONCEPTUAL AND LEGISLATIVE DEFINITION OF CIVIL RESPONSIBILITY
( Pp. 69-75)
More about authors
Ibragimova A. I.
kandidat yuridicheskih nauk, docent kafedry arbitrazhnogo, grazhdanskogo i administrativnogo processa
North-Caucasian Advanced Training Institute (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
North-Caucasian Advanced Training Institute (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Abstract:
In the modern doctrine and in the practice of the Russian Civil Law applying, there is a lack of a single lawful and expedient scientific, conceptual and legislative definition of the general legal fundamental, interconnected and interdependent concepts of «civil violation», «civil or legal responsibility», «civil sanctions» , which leads to the idea of conceptual flaws and gaps in the general doctrine and theory of Civil Law, about the lack of common legal positions of the Russian courts in interpreting, understanding and application of the law to resolve disputes in a fair determination of the size of compensation for damage and losses, caused by the subjects of Civil Law. In the stated context, on the basis of the analysis of scientific research of domestic and foreign scholars and legal scholars, as well as judicial practice in this area, the article outlines a model of a general theoretical, scientific, conceptual and legislative definition of the concepts of civil liability and legal sanctions in modern Civil Caw of Russia.
How to Cite:
Ibragimova A.I., (2019), DIVERSITY OF VIEWS ON THE SCIENTIFIC, CONCEPTUAL AND LEGISLATIVE DEFINITION OF CIVIL RESPONSIBILITY. Sociopolitical Sciences, 4 => 69-75.
Reference list:
Grazhdanskoe pravo / Pod red. E.A. Sukhanova. M., 2004. T. 1. S. 590-592.
Ibragimova A.I. Institut spravedlivogo vozmeshcheniya vreda i ubytkov v rossiyskom grazhdanskom prave. Istoriya stanovleniya, sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya. Makhachkala, 2018.
Ibragimov I.M. Pravomernye vozmozhnosti zashchity prav poterpevshego v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse. M., YUrisprudentsiya. 2008.
Krasavchikov O.A. Kategorii nauki grazhdanskogo prava. Izbrannye trudy. V dvukh tomakh. T. 2. M.: Statut. 2005. S. 128.
Osipyan B.A. Osnovanie i sistema pravovoy otvetstvennosti i nakazaniya: razlichenie ponyatiy imputatio , indictare , sanctio , poena // Sovremennoe pravo. 2007. № 5. S. 77-85.
Osipyan B.A. Pravomernoe i tselesoobraznoe razlichenie raznykh vidov yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti fizicheskikh, dolzhnostnykh i yuridicheskikh lits // CHyernye Dyry v Rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2018 № 1. S. 16-22.
Osnovy grazhdanskogo prava /Pod red. N.D. Eriashvili, R.A. Kurbanova. M., YUniti. Zakon i pravo. 2018. S. 223-234.
Pokrovskiy I.A. Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava. M., 1998. S. 207-223.
Sukhanov E.A. Otvetstvennost gosudarstva po grazhdansko-pravovym obyazatel stvam. Grazhdanskoe pravo Rossii. M., Statut, 2008. S. 475-487.
SHon D.T. Konstitutsionnaya otvetstvennost // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1995, № 7.
YUridicheskaya otvetstvennost : problemy teorii i praktiki. Sbornik statey. Ufa, 2006. S. 192.
Ibragimova A.I. Institut spravedlivogo vozmeshcheniya vreda i ubytkov v rossiyskom grazhdanskom prave. Istoriya stanovleniya, sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya. Makhachkala, 2018.
Ibragimov I.M. Pravomernye vozmozhnosti zashchity prav poterpevshego v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse. M., YUrisprudentsiya. 2008.
Krasavchikov O.A. Kategorii nauki grazhdanskogo prava. Izbrannye trudy. V dvukh tomakh. T. 2. M.: Statut. 2005. S. 128.
Osipyan B.A. Osnovanie i sistema pravovoy otvetstvennosti i nakazaniya: razlichenie ponyatiy imputatio , indictare , sanctio , poena // Sovremennoe pravo. 2007. № 5. S. 77-85.
Osipyan B.A. Pravomernoe i tselesoobraznoe razlichenie raznykh vidov yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti fizicheskikh, dolzhnostnykh i yuridicheskikh lits // CHyernye Dyry v Rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2018 № 1. S. 16-22.
Osnovy grazhdanskogo prava /Pod red. N.D. Eriashvili, R.A. Kurbanova. M., YUniti. Zakon i pravo. 2018. S. 223-234.
Pokrovskiy I.A. Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava. M., 1998. S. 207-223.
Sukhanov E.A. Otvetstvennost gosudarstva po grazhdansko-pravovym obyazatel stvam. Grazhdanskoe pravo Rossii. M., Statut, 2008. S. 475-487.
SHon D.T. Konstitutsionnaya otvetstvennost // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1995, № 7.
YUridicheskaya otvetstvennost : problemy teorii i praktiki. Sbornik statey. Ufa, 2006. S. 192.
