Some aspects of the application of new medical technologies in reproduction, therapy and genetic modification of humans, plants and animals through the prism of intellectual property rights protection in South Africa
( Pp. 180-195)

This article aims to demonstrates some facets of the current state of legal regulation and ethical problems of application of new medical technologies in reproduction, therapy and genetic modification of humans, plants and animals through the prism of intellectual property rights protection and based on: the materials of a number of normative acts (laws, ministerial Regulations) of one of the BRICS countries - South Africe. In this format, based on analytical reflections over information taken from sources and literature from the list of sources and literature, as well as a number of legal provisions driven to life by the existence and application of such technologies and new knowledge; opinions, ideas and ethical and legal discussions, the article analyzes the provisions of South Africa's approaches that create patterns of application of new medical technologies, the potential and ethical and legal basis for such development, taking into account the current views of the doctrine and legislation. The relevance of this research is due to the fact that a number of approaches to legislation and ethical approaches under study are new and could not be considered in studies of an earlier period. Thus, this study serves to fill this gap. The author's results are presented in the light of the identified state interest within the framework of the liberal model of the relationship between law and bioethics in delineating the boundaries of permissible (notpermissible) use of new medical technologies in the field of reproduction and treatment of human, genetic modification of humans, animals and plants not only from the perspective of legal and ethical constraints, permissions and prohibitions but the implementation of the provisions of applicable South African legislation on the intellectual property rights protection, which, due to its examination request system, can not guarantee that the patented product - the result of genetic modification - can be freely used in South Africa with regard to the restrictions and prohibitions established by 2003 Act and relevant Regulations No. 175, 177, 180. The theoretical and practical significance of the results obtained is determined by the fact that Russian readers will be provided with up-to-date scientific information about the state of Indian legislation and doctrine, and other ideas in the field under study, which in practical terms will contribute to understanding the gap (or lack thereof) in the achievements in this field of Russian and foreign researchers and practitioners in terms of their implications at the level of practice and legislation.

Ksenia M.B., (2020), SOME ASPECTS OF THE APPLICATION OF NEW MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN REPRODUCTION, THERAPY AND GENETIC MODIFICATION OF HUMANS, PLANTS AND ANIMALS THROUGH THE PRISM OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS PROTECTION IN SOUTH AFRICA. Sociopolitical Sciences, 2 => 180-195.

FAQ: Embrional nye stvolovye kletki. 7 faktov ob unikal nom tipe plyuripotentnykh kletok mlekopitayushchikh. 21 fevralya 2013. URL: https://postnauka.ru/faq/9413 (data obrashcheniya: 10.03.2020).
Belikova K.M. Zashchita soderzhashcheysya v patentakh nauchnoy informatsii sredstvami, predusmotrennymi pravom YUAR (podkhody stran BRIKS) // Intellektual naya sobstvennost . Promyshlennaya sobstvennost . 2019. № 8. S. 11-16.
Belikova K.M. Nekotorye aspekty primeneniya novykh meditsinskikh tekhnologiy v sferakh reproduktsii, terapii (chelovek) i gennoy modifikatsii (chelovek, rasteniya, zhivotnye) skvoz prizmu polozheniy normativnogo regulirovaniya i priznannykh eticheskikh pravil (guidelines) v khode issledovaniy stvolovykh kletok i biomeditsinskikh issledovaniy v Indii v kontekste zashchity prav intellektual noy sobstvennosti // ZHurnal ID YUr-VAK . 2020 (v pechati).
Belikova K.M. Nekotorye grani pravovogo regulirovaniya i eticheskie problemy reproduktivnogo i terapevticheskogo redaktirovaniya genov v Kitae (opyt stran BRIKS) // Kopirayt. 2020. № 1 (v pechati);
Belikova K.M. Protsessual nye aspekty zashchity nauchnoy informatsii, soderzhashcheysya v proizvedeniyakh, okhranyaemykh avtorskim pravom, v YUAR // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. YUridicheskiy zhurnal. 2019. № 3. S. 227-236.
Belikova K.M., Badaeva N.V. Pravovaya kvalifikatsiya tkaney cheloveka kak ob ektov prava sobstvennosti: podkhody YUAR // Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoy praktiki. 2019. № 3. S. 154-159.
V YUAR nepravitel stvennaya organizatsiya boretsya s geneticheski modifitsirovannoy zasukhoustoychivoy kukuruzoy. 14 avgusta, 2015. URL: https://gmoobzor.com/stati/v-yuar-nepravitelstvennaya-organizaciya-boretsya-s-geneticheski-modificirovannoj-zasuxoustojchivoj-kukuruzoj.html (data obrashcheniya: 29.02.2020).
Eremenko V.I. Zakonodatel stvo ob intellektual noy sobstvennosti YUzhno-Afrikanskoy Respubliki // Zakonodatel stvo i ekonomika. 2011. № 7. S. 62-71.
Ivanov D.V., CHabanenko A.V. Zakon o kletochnykh produktakh: proryv ili porazhenie // Vestnik novykh meditsinskikh tekhnologiy. 2017. T. 24. № 4. S. 166-176. DOI: 10.12737/artic le 5a38fcf7520ef7.46909432.
Istoriya Timoti Brauna, kotoryy pobedil VICH i chut ne poplatilsya za eto zhizn yu. URL: https://www.adme.ru/ zhizn-nauka/istoriya-timoti-brauna-kotoryj-pobedil-vich-ichut-ne-poplatilsya-za-eto-zhiznyu-2072915/ (data obrashcheniya: 15.03.2020).
Markevich T., Belyaev S. Otsrochennaya ekspertiza zayavki na izobretenie. URL: https://bvlegal.by/blog/articles/intellectual property/deferred examination of application for invention/ (data obrashcheniya: 14.03.2020).
Merzlikin P. Klonirovanie cheloveka - ne meditsinskaya tekhnologiya. Interv yu biologa SHukhrata Mitalipova. 9 yanvarya 2018. URL: https://meduza.io/feature/2018/01/09/ klonirovanie-cheloveka-ne-meditsinskaya-tehnologiya (data obrashcheniya: 16.01.2020).
Mukhina V. T-kletka s khimernym antigennym retseptorom (CAR-T). 12.09.2019. URL: https://elementy.ru/kartinka dnya/976/T kletka s khimernym antigennym retseptorom CAR T (data obrashcheniya: 15.03.2020)
Pishchita A.N., Klimov A.E. Informirovannoe dobrovol noe soglasie v meditsine (pravovoy aspekt) // Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Meditsina. 2006. № 1 (33). S. 112-118.
Redaktirovanie genoma s CRISPR/Cas9. Ob immunnoy sisteme bakteriy, mekhanizme deystviya CRISPR/Cas9 i rezul tatakh redaktirovaniya genoma chelovecheskikh embrionov. 15 fevralya 2016. URL: https://postnauka.ru/faq/59807 (data obrashcheniya: 15.02.2020).
Sudareva E.O. Dobrovol noe soglasie kak uslovie meditsinskogo vmeshatel stva v prave RF i SSHA // Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: YUridicheskie nauki. 2008. № 3. S. 70-75.
Belikova K.M. Reproductive and therapeutic editing of human genes and gene modification of plants and animals in terms of legislation and research activity restrictions in Brazil // ZHurnal iz BD Scopus. 2020 (In press).
Belikova K.M. Some general remarks and legal restrictions in reproductive and therapeutic gene modification in Russia // ZHurnal iz BD Scopus. 2020 (In press).
Beth Amato. Editing disease in South Africa. November 12, 2019. https://www.wits.ac.za/news/latest-news/research-news/2019/2019-11/editing-disease-in-south-africa-. html (data obrashcheniya: 29.02.2020).
Biosafety Risks of Genome Editing Techniques in Plant Breeding. Ed. by Africa Centre for Biodiversity. February 2017. P. 5. URL: https://bangmosnowdotcom.files.wordpress. com/2017/02/biosafety-genome-editing-pb.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 07.03.2020).
Genetically Modified Organisms Act No. 15 of 1997. Government Gazette. May 23, 1997. Vol. 383. No. 18029. URL: http:// www.saflii.org/za/legis/num act/gmoa1997286/ (data obrashcheniya: 06.03.2020).
Howard H.C., El van C.G., Forzano F. et al. One small edit for humans, one giant edit for humankind Points and questions to consider for a responsible way forward for gene editing in humans. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2018. No. 26 (1). Rr. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-017-0024-z
India. National ethical guidelines for biomedical and health research involving human participants. Compiled Edited by Dr. Roli Mathur; Published by Director-General of Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, October, 2017. 187 p. URL: http://www.icmr.nic.in/ethical guidelines.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 13.02.2020).
Ku D. The patentability of the Crispr-Cas9 genome editing tool. Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property. 2017. No. 16 (2). Rr. 408-439.
Medicines and Related Substances Control Act 101 of 1965 after amendment by the Medicines and Related Substances Control Amendment Act (Act 90 of 1997). URL: https://www.daggacouple.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Medicines-ACT-101- of-1965-Amendment.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 07.03.2020).
Mental Health Care Act, 2002 (Act No. 17 of 2002). URL: https:// www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis document/201409/a1702.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 08.03.2020).
National Health Act No. 61 of 2003. URL: https://www. gov.za/documents/national-health-act (data obrashcheniya: 07.03.2020).
National Heritage Resources Act, 1999 (Act No. 25 of 1999). URL: https://www.polity.org.za/article/national-heritage-resources-act-no-25-of-1999-1999-01-01 (data obrashcheniya: 10.03.2020).
Nursing Act, 2005 (Act No. 33 of 2005). URL: https://sanc. co.za/pdf/Nursing 20Act 202005.PDF (data obrashcheniya: 10.03.2020).
Patents Act, 1978 Act No. 57, 1978 . Government Gazette. Cape Town. May 17, 1978. Vol. 155. No. 6012. URL: https://www.gov. za/sites/default/files/gcis document/201504/act-57-1978.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 06.05.2019).
Pillay S., Thaldar D.W. CRISPR: Challenges to South African biotechnology law. S. Afr. J. Bioethics Law. 2018. No. 11 (2). Rr. 89-92. DOI:10.7196/SAJBL.2018.v11i2.653.
Rodriguez E. Ethical issues in genome editing using CRISPR/ Cas9 system. J. Clin. Res. Bioeth. 2016. No. 7. R. 266. https://doi. org/10.4172/2155-9627.1000266
Section 5: patents. Part II: Standards concerning the availability, scope and use of Intellectual Property Rights. Uruguay Round Agreement: TRIPS. URL: https://www.wto.org/english/docs e/ legal e/27-trips 04c e.htm 5 (data obrashcheniya: 16.02.2020).
Teksty vsekh nazvannykh Pravil sm. v Ofitsial noy Gazete YUAR No. 35099 ot 2 marta 2012 g. Government Gazette. March 2, 2012. URL: http://sashg.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/ GovGazette2Mar2012.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 01.06.2019).

science, scientific information, scientific research, South Africa, BRICS, assisted reproductive technologies, IVF, reproductive and therapeutic gene editing, embryos, stem cells, human, plants, animals, discoveries, inventions, ethics, medicine.