The Path to Relief for Infringed Sports Rights in the Context of Geopolitical Conflicts: The Perspective of the Case of Russian Domestic Football Team Sanctioned
( Pp. 135-143)

As the conflict between Russia and Ukraine intensifies, the Western football world has chosen to sanction Russia by banning its domestic football teams from participating in FIFA and UEFA affiliated tournaments. Unlike previous disciplinary sanctions imposed by international football organisations, this sanction has a number of rare features in terms of the context in which it is imposed, the subject matter of its issuance and its effects, and will inevitably have a profound impact on the future governance of international sport. This article will analyze the legal governance system of international football organisations, with a focus on international sports arbitration under the jurisdiction of CAS and consider how Chinese sportsman can use legal weapons to avoid a vicious circle in the face of crises and seek more benign external interactions, with a view to establishing a voice for Chinese sport.

Shi J.., Chen H.., (2022), THE PATH TO RELIEF FOR INFRINGED SPORTS RIGHTS IN THE CONTEXT OF GEOPOLITICAL CONFLICTS: THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE CASE OF RUSSIAN DOMESTIC FOOTBALL TEAM SANCTIONED. Sociopolitical Sciences, 4 => 135-143.

Plančić B., Zanchi Е., Čudić M. Political correctness - maintaining a balanced view. Transactions on Maritime Science. 2013. No. 2 (1). P. 56.
Xisheng Wang. Thoughts on ideology and its right to speak. Studies on Marxism. 2007. No. 4. Pp. 42-46. (In China)
Jianping Ruan. Right to speak and construction of international order. Contemporary International Relations. 2003. No. (5). Pp. 31-37, 59. (In China)
Addo & Van Nistelrooij v. UEFA, Arbitration CAS 2001/A/324. Matthieu Reeb. Digest of CAS Awards III 2001-2003. Kluwer International, 2003.
Qinyu Shao. Problems and improvement measures for penalty of suspension of membership by international sports organizations. Suzhou University Graduation Paper, 2020. P. 14.
Shuli Guo. Theory and practice of international sports arbitration. Wuhan University Press, 2009. Pp. 99-102.
Yingzi Xiong. The scope of review of cas in the international sport arbitration: The perspective of “De Novo” principle. Journal of Tianjin University of Sport. 2016. No. 31 (4). P. 311. (In China)
Mavromati D., Reeb M. The code of the court of arbitration for sport: Commentary, cases and materials. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2015.
Hua Guo, Han Gao. Risks of implementation and its procedural control on the system of lenient punishment for admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment-based on. Legal Forum. 2021. No. 1. P. 54. (In China)
Xin Qiao. Research on arbitration power - fairness of arbitration procedure and protection of rights. Law Press, 2001. P. 264.
Huimeng Li, Weikang Xu. On the relief of the “Court of arbitration for sport” adjudication - an analysis based on the Swiss federal supreme court. Sports & Science. 2020. No. 41 (5). P. 57. (In China)
Garraffa P. The proportionality of the sanction’s principle, according to the Italian and international sports. Law Sports and Jurisprudence. 2014. No. 35 (4). P. 12.
Dingxian Zheng. Study on the factors of Chinese sports discourse power game. Fujian Sports Science and Technology. 2013. No. 32 (4). Pp. 22-24. (In China)

FIFA, UEFA, CAS, provisional and conservatory measures.