PECULIARITIES OF CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF COURT DECISIONS IN CASES RELATED TO ALIMONY
( Pp. 64-68)

Task. The authors of the article set himself the task of identifying the peculiarities of reviewing and making decisions on alimony cases. Model. To solve such a theoretical problem, it is necessary to investigate the essence of alimony, the peculiarities of alimony obligations that affect the specifics of the cases in this category. Findings. Specific features of maintenance obligations affect not only the procedure for handling such cases, but also the content of court decisions. The scope of the study. Limited to relations in the field of family, civil, civil procedural law of the Russian Federation. Practical value. Identifying the problems and causes of inadequate fulfillment of maintenance obligations by family members will make it possible to formulate general measures aimed at developing effective mechanisms for the enforcement of judicial decisions on the recovery of alimony. Social consequences. The definition of the essence of the alimony obligation, its species characteristics will allow to determine the relationship and interdependence of the norms of substantive law on the content of decisions aimed at the payment of alimony. Originality, value. Systematic study and study of the reasons for the improper performance of maintenance obligations, the identification of common problems that impede the proper fulfillment of obligations in practice, will help to formulate general approaches to the enforcement of court decisions on the recovery of alimony. The analysis of the norms of the legislation of the Russian Federation makes it possible to identify additional opportunities for the implementation of the protection of the property rights of the child.

Lebed K.A., Letova N.V., (2019), PECULIARITIES OF CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF COURT DECISIONS IN CASES RELATED TO ALIMONY. Sociopolitical Sciences, 4 => 64-68.

Semeynyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 29.12.1995 № 223-FZ // SZ RF. 01.01.1996. № 1. St.16.
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 1 iyulya 2012g. № 761 O Natsional noy strategii deystviy v interesakh detey na 2012-2017g. // SZ RF. 2012. № 23. St. 2994.
Pchelintseva L.M. Semeynoe pravo Rossii: uchebnik dlya vuzov. M, Norma. 2007. S. 391
Kommentariy k Semeynomu kodeksu RF / Otv. red. O.N. Nizamieva. M, Prospekt. 2010. S. 323
Antokol skaya M.V. Semeynoe pravo: uchebnik. M.: YUrist. 1996. S. 279.
Gongalo B.M. Alimentnoe obyazatel stvo // Semeynoe i zhilishchnoe pravo. 2016. № 5. S.16.
Ryasentsev V.A. Semeynoe pravo. M.: YUrid. lit. 1971. S. 241.
Grazhdanskiy protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 14.11.2002 № 138-FZ // SZ RF. 2002. № 46. St.4532.
Avdyukov M.G. Sudebnoe reshenie. M., 1959. S.102
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 19 dekabrya 2003 g. № 23 O sudebnom reshenii (punkt 3) // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2004. № 2.
Gurvich M.A. Sudebnoe reshenie. M., 1976. S.56.
Gribanov V.P. Osushchestvlenie i zashchita grazhdanskikh prav. M.: Statut. 2001. S. 20
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2018. № 4.
Rasporyazhenie Pravitel stva RF ot 25.08.2014 № 1618-r Kontseptsiya gosudarstvennoy semeynoy politiki v Rossiyskoy Federatsii na period do 2025 goda // SZ RF. 2014. № 35. St. 4811.
Bespalov YU.F. Semeyno-pravovoe polozhenie rebenka v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: monografiya. M.: Prospekt. 2014 S. 42.
Pergament A.I. Alimentnye obyazatel stva po sovetskomu pravu. M.: Gos. Izd. YUrid. Lit, 1951. S. 18-19.
Gurvich M.A. Postanovlenie suda pervoy instantsii // Sovetskiy grazhdanskiy protsess / Pod red. M.A. Gurvicha. M., 1967. S.225
Zeyder N.B. Sudebnoe reshenie po grazhdanskomu delu. M., 1966. S.67
Grazhdanskiy protsess / Pod red. M.K. Treushnikova. M., 2011. S.399
Grazhdanskiy protsess / Pod red. S.V. Nikitina. M.: RGUP, 2016. S.179.
Karkhalev D.N. Okhranitel noe grazhdanskoe pravootnoshenie. M, Statut. 2009. S. 11.