«HISTORICAL POLICY» IN MODERN RUSSIA: THE SPREAD OF THE THEORY AND METHODS OF TEACHING MULTI-CONCEPTUAL (TOLERANT) HISTORY OF RUSSIA
( Pp. 9-13)

More about authors
Kamynin Vladimir D.
Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation Lichman Boris V. doktor istoricheskih nauk, professor, zav. kafedroy istoricheskih disciplin Uralskogo instituta ekonomiki, upravleniya i prava, Zasluzhennyy rabotnik Vysshey shkoly RF, chlen Nauchno-metodicheskogo soveta po istorii ministerstva obrazovaniya i nauki RF, prorektor Uralskogo instituta ekonomiki, upravleniya i prava, professor kafedry teorii i istorii mezhdunarodnyh otnosheniy departamenta mezhdunarodnyh otnosheniy Uralskogo gumanitarnogo instituta Uralskogo federalnogo universiteta im. B.N. Elcina
Ural Federal University named after B.N. Yeltsin
Abstract:
History, like any scientific discipline of social science, is influenced by ideology, state power, which inevitably leads to the conjuncture in research. The dependence of history on the policy of the state was manifested at all stages of the development of historical science, since the annalistic period. In modern science, this dependence is characterized as a «historical policy» of the state. The article deals with only one aspect of the «historical policy» of the modern Russian state - its impact on the teaching of history in universities. There are three stages in the implementation of the «historical policy» in modern Russia. It is argued that at different stages of the impact of internal and external factors on historical science and the teaching of history manifested to varying degrees. Already in the course of perestroika in our country began to apply different theories (approaches) to the explanation of the historical process. The article shows how Ural historians in the early 1990s proposed a new method of teaching history as a multi-conceptual history, according to which the unified theory of history was replaced by a set of several theories of history; the rules of multi-theoretical study were developed, which were embodied in a number of textbooks. Textbooks proclaim the principle of equal respect (tolerance) for different interpretations of Russian history. Examines the impact mnogokasatelnoy (tolerant) paradigm for the study of history in modern historical studies.
How to Cite:
Kamynin V.D., Lichman B.V., (2019), «HISTORICAL POLICY» IN MODERN RUSSIA: THE SPREAD OF THE THEORY AND METHODS OF TEACHING MULTI-CONCEPTUAL (TOLERANT) HISTORY OF RUSSIA. Sociopolitical Sciences, 4 => 9-13.
Reference list:
Vert N. Istoriya sovetskogo gosudarstva 1990-1991 /Per. s fr. M.: Progress: Progress-Akademiya, 1992. 480 s.
Gumilev L.N. Ot Rusi do Rossii. Ocherki po russkoy istorii. 8-11 klassy: Posobie dlya obshcheobrazovatel nykh uchebnykh zavedeniy / Pod red. A.M. Panchenko. M.: Drofa, Natalis, 1996. 362 s.
Zapariy V.V., Kamynin V.D., Lichman B.V. Po volnam nashey pamyati.. : Formirovanie raznomysliya v uchebnikakh istorii Rossii (UGTU-UPI, nachalo 90-kh) // QuaestioRossica. T. 7. 2019. № 1. S. 23-36.
Ionov I.N. Rossiyskaya tsivilizatsiya, IX-nachalo XX v.: Uchebnaya kniga dlya 10-11 klassov obshcheobrazovatel nykh uchrezhdeniy. M.: Prosveshchenie, 1995. 319 s.
Kamynin V.D. Vliyanie paradigmy mnogokontseptual nosti na ural skikh uchenykh na rubezhe KHKH-KHKHI vv. // Vestnik Ural skogo instituta ekonomiki, upravleniya i prava (Ekaterinburg). 2016. № 1(34). S. 81-87.
Kamynin V.D., Lazareva E.V. Istoricheskaya politika na Urale v 1930-e gg.: sovremennyy vzglyad // Istoriya i sovremennoe mirovozzrenie. 2019. T. 1. № 2. S. 90-98.
Lichman B.V. Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo - klyuch k ob yasneniyu raznykh tochek zreniya na istoriyu Rossii //Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki. 2017. № 3. S. 122-125.
Mnogokontseptual nost v nauke. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 65-letiyu professora B.V.Lichmana/Pod red. V. V. Zapariya. Izd-vo UMTS-UPI. Ekaterinburg, 2011. 443 s.
Munchaev SH. M., Ustinov V. M. Istoriya Rossii. Uchebnik dlya vuzov. M.: Kul tura i sport , YUNITI, 1998. 487 s.
Prepodavanie istorii v shkole. 2002. № 1. S. 2-8.
Tertyshnyy A.T., Trofimov A.V. Rossiyskaya istoriya: modeli izmereniya i ob yasneniya. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo UrGEU, 2005. 576 s.
Fortsman G.V., Mamonov V.F. V Vol terakh nekto Vert // Vestnik CHelyabinskogo universiteta. Ser.: Istoriya. 1993. № 2. S. 91-93.