Systemic problems of forensic activities of customs authorities and their solutions
( Pp. 113-117)

More about authors
Aristeev Mingiyan S. soiskatel stepeni kandidata yuridicheskih nauk kafedry ugolovno-pravovyh disciplin; glavnyy specialist-ekspert yuridicheskogo otdela
Russian Customs Academy
Abstract:
The article presents the results of a study of the problems of forensic activities of the customs authorities of the Russian Federation, conducted in the period from 2016 to 2019. The analysis made it possible to identify and classify the so-called “factors negatively affecting the forensic activities of customs authorities”. The above classification allows us to reflect at a comprehensive level the system of forensic activities of customs authorities in terms of its weaknesses. The text gradually reveals and describes the positions of some domestic scientists on the way to solving the problems of forensic activities of customs authorities. Based on the analysis of empirical material, the work of expert scientists and forensic scientists, recommendations are made on solving specific problems of forensic activities of the customs authorities of the Russian Federation.
How to Cite:
Aristeev M.S., (2020), SYSTEMIC PROBLEMS OF FORENSIC ACTIVITIES OF CUSTOMS AUTHORITIES AND THEIR SOLUTIONS. Sociopolitical Sciences, 2 => 113-117.
Reference list:
Aristeev M.S. Perspektivy razvitiya teoreticheskikh postroeniy na osnove izucheniya sudebno-ekspertnoy deyatel nosti tamozhennykh organov // Publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. 2018. № 1 (37). S. 210-219.
Volynskiy A.F. Reforma sudebno-ekspertnoy i tekhniko-kriminalisticheskoy deyatel nosti kak neobkhodimost // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2018. № 3. S. 186-191.
ZHbankov V.A., Kozlov V.I., Tabakov A.V. Organizatsionno-strukturnye problemy tekhniko-kriminalisticheskogo obespecheniya podrazdeleniy doznaniya tamozhennykh organov // Vestnik Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii. 2019. № 4.
ZHigalov N.YU., Gol chevskiy V.F. O neobkhodimosti koordinatsii vzaimodeystviya i sotrudnichestva ekspertnykh uchrezhdeniy raznykh vedomstv // Problemy klassifikatsii sudebnykh ekspertiz, sertifikatsii i validatsii metodicheskogo obespecheniya, standartizatsii sudebno-ekspertnoy deyatel nosti: mater. Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., Moskva, 21 yanvarya 2016 g. M.: Prospekt, 2016. S. 119-123.
Pis mo FTS ot 18.04.2006 №01-06/13167 O metodologicheskikh rekomendatsiyakh (vmeste s Metodicheskimi rekomendatsiyami o naznachenii ekspertiz dolzhnostnymi litsami tamozhennykh organov i provedenii ekspertiz TSentral nym ekspertno-kriminalisticheskim tamozhennym upravleniem i ekspertno-kriminalisticheskimi sluzhbami regional nymi filialami TSEKTU, inymi ekspertnymi organizatsiyami i ekspertami ). Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Prikaz FTS ot 30 iyulya 2010 g. № 1427 Ob utverzhdenii norm zatrat vremeni na proizvodstvo ekspertiz i metodicheskikh rekomendatsiy . Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Rossinskaya E.R., Galyashina E.I., Zinin A.M. Teoriya sudebnoy ekspertizy (Sudebnaya ekspertologiya): uchebnik / pod red. E.R. Rossinskoy. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Norma; Infra-M, 2016. S. 55.
Keywords:
forensic science, forensic activities, customs, forensic services, forensic security, negative factors.