Gender Aspects in Art and Religion from the Point of View of N. Luhmann’s System Theory
( Pp. 186-190)

More about authors
Liutaeva Maria S. Candidate of Philosophy; senior lecturer at the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies
Vladimdir State University named after Alexander and Nikolay Stoletovs
Vladimdir, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The article discusses the possibility of applying the theory of autopoietic communication systems to the scientific description of issues of gender differences. The proposed theory can act as a metatheoretical level of consideration of the topic and allows using the position of the observer of the “second order”, directs the focus of attention to the differences verbalized in communication, reveals the observing system based on the involved code. The specificity of gender aspects in the functioning and self-description of the systems of art and religion presented in the discourses “patriarchal bias” and “scholarly bias” is indicated. Gender differences as a topic of communication often actualize the systemic codes of political, legal and moral systems. They represent one of the forms of monitoring the fulfillment of freedom and equality, critically observe the availability of universal inclusion in systemic communications, including in the systems of religion and art, when success within the systems is governed by specific codes and programs, but not by gender differences. A positive strategy is demonstrated for replenishing self-descriptions of systems of religion and art, including the “absent presence” of women in the memory of systems, making the contribution of women to systemic autopoiesis “visible”.
How to Cite:
Liutaeva M.S., (2021), GENDER ASPECTS IN ART AND RELIGION FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF N. LUHMANN’S SYSTEM THEORY. Sociopolitical Sciences, 6 => 186-190.
Reference list:
Barash R. (ed.). Systematic and communicative theory of the protest movement: Protest as “an alternative without an alternative”. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2018. No. 3. Pp. 123-138. (In Rus.)
Gabriel M. Ninth street women: Lee Krasner, Elaine de Kooning, Grace Hartigan, Joan Mitchell, and Helen Frankenthaler: Five painters and the movement that changed modern art. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov, Ferber, 2020. 560 p.
Kirilina A.V. Linguistic gender studies as a manifestation of episteme change in humanitarian knowledge. Bulletin of the Military University. 2010. No. 4 (24). Pp.110-114.
Legoyda V. Do jeans interfere with salvation. The experience of modern apologetics. Мoscow: Trade House «Beliy Dom», 2007. 128 р.
Luhmann N. Society of society. In 2 vols. Vol. 1. Moscow: Logos, 2011. 640 p.
Luhmann N. Society of society. In 2 vols. Vol. 2. Moscow: Logos, 2011. 640 p.
Mavrina T. Color is jubilant. Diaries. Sketches about art. Moscow: Molodaya Gvardia, 2006. 364 p.
Petrakova A.S. The researching of the problem of personality’s identification and self-identification in communicative approach. Humanities, Social-economic and Social Sciences. 2017. No. 8-9. (In Rus.)
Sukovataya V.A. Feminist theology and gender studies in religion: Prospects for a new spirituality. Social Sciences and Modernity. 2002. No. 4. Pp. 183-192. (In Rus.)
Titscher S., Meyer M., Wodak R., Vetter E. Methods of text and discourse analysis. Kharkiv: Humanitarian Center, 2009. 356 p.
Hodge S. Major women in art history. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov, Ferber, 2021. 224 p.
Gershon I. Seeing like a system: Luhmann for anthropologists. Anthropological Theory. 2005. No. 5 (2). Pp. 99-116.
Hintz B. Niklas Luhmann, gender, queer. Soziologiemagazin // Publizieren Statt Archivieren. 2013. No. 6 (1). Pp. 45-56. URL: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-387595
Hayward S., Marshall K. Women, religion, and peacebuilding. Washington: United States Institute of Peace, 2015.
Luhmann N. Die Religion der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2002. 364 S.
McCutcheon R.T. Religion in 50 words: A critical vocabulary. London; New York: Routledge, 2021. 332 p.
Perez C.C. Invisible women: Exposing data bias in a world designed for men. London: Chatto Windus, Kindle Edition, 2019. Loc. 405.
Weiss M.G. Non-dualistic sex. Josef Mitterer s non-dualistic philosophy in the light of Judith Butler s (de)constructivist feminism // Constructivist Foundations. 2013. No. 8 (2). Pp. 183-189. URL: http://constructivist.info/8/2/183
Laqueur T.W. Making sex: Body and gender from the greeks to freud. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1992. 313 p.
Keywords:
gender studies, autopoietic systems, Niklas Luhmann, religion and art.


Related Articles

Sociocultural communication of Russia Pages: 124-131 DOI: 10.33693/2223-0092-2020-10-4-124-131 Issue №17184
“Novelty” as a communicative criterion of social “autopoiesis” (on the examples of differences in the society of Homeric and archaic Greece)
Niklas Luhmann novelty religion and art communication Homeric Greece
Show more
Political and social philosophy Pages: 147-153 DOI: 10.33693/2223-0092-2020-10-6-147-153 Issue №17984
Memory and forgetting. Socio-philosophical analysis of differences on the example of archaic Greece
memory forgetting “autopoietic” systems Niklas Luhmann semantic distinctions
Show more
Social and Political Philosophy Pages: 157-163 DOI: 10.33693/2223-0092-2022-12-2-157-163 Issue №20866
Admiration (admiratio) as a Criterion for the Autopoiesis of art (on the Example of the Distinctions of Ancient Thinkers)
admiratio admiratio wonder art N. Luhmann
Show more
14. FOREIGN SCIENTIFIC SCHOOLS Pages: 178-180 Issue №7973
THE DEVELOPMENT OF CHINA'S PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRY MANAGEMENT (GENDER-SENSITIVE)
gender studies China the oil industry
Show more