FEATURES OF DEFINITION OF SIGNS OF THE OBJECTIVE PARTY OF PUBLIC APPEALS TO IMPLEMENTATION TERRORIST ACTIVITIES, PUBLIC JUSTIFY TERRORISM OR PROPAGANDA TERRORISM'S
( Pp. 137-142)
More about authors
Pomnina Svetlana Nikolaevna
Cand.Sci.(Law), Associate professor, associate professor of the criminal law, criminalistics and criminology Department
National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University
Saransk, Russian Federation Vakhonina Evgeniya B. magistrant. Podrazdelenie: kafedra ugolovnogo prava, kriminalistiki i kriminologii
National research Mordovia State University named after N.P. Ogaryov
National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University
Saransk, Russian Federation Vakhonina Evgeniya B. magistrant. Podrazdelenie: kafedra ugolovnogo prava, kriminalistiki i kriminologii
National research Mordovia State University named after N.P. Ogaryov
Abstract:
Objectives: the problematic issues of determining the characteristics of the objective side of the crime provided for in Article 205.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation continue to be relevant for the theory and practice of criminal law, which necessitates their in-depth and systematic research in order to ensure uniformity in the application of the analyzed norm and the realization of its preventive potential. Methods: the use of dialectical, comparative, formal-legal, criminal-statistical methods allowed to analyze the main categories and concepts used to implement the correct qualification of public appeals to carry out terrorist activities, public justification of terrorism and its propaganda. Conclusions: the article reveals the peculiarities of determining the constructive features of the objective side of crime, stipulated in Article 205.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. An analysis of the provisions of criminal legislation and the opinions of individual legal scholars made it possible to identify the main problems that occur in the qualification of the criminal offenses investigated. Within the framework of the article, the criminalization of actions consisting in public calls for terrorist activities and public justification and propaganda of terrorism is justified, two different categories of «terrorist activities» and «terrorism» are analyzed, which are simultaneously used by the legislator in the construction of this crime. During the consideration of the above-mentioned problems, taking into account the positions reflected in the criminal legal literature, recommendations were proposed to increase the preventive nature of the analyzed criminal law norm. Meaning: the provisions of scientific research, reflected in the article, can be used in the teaching of criminal discipline disciplines, as well as by persons carrying out the criminal legal qualification of crimes.
How to Cite:
Pomnina S.N., Vakhonina E.B., (2018), FEATURES OF DEFINITION OF SIGNS OF THE OBJECTIVE PARTY OF PUBLIC APPEALS TO IMPLEMENTATION TERRORIST ACTIVITIES, PUBLIC JUSTIFY TERRORISM OR PROPAGANDA TERRORISM'S. Sociopolitical Sciences, 3 => 137-142.
Reference list:
Konventsiya Soveta Evropy o preduprezhdenii terrorizma (CETS N 196) rus., angl. (Zaklyuchena v g. Varshave 16 maya 2005 goda)(s izm. ot 22.10.2015 goda) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2009. № 20. St. 2393.
O protivodeystvii terrorizmu: Federal nyy zakon Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 6 marta 2006 goda № 35-FZ (v red. ot 06.07.2016 goda) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2006. № 11. St. 1146.
O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii v tselyakh sovershenstvovaniya mer protivodeystviya terrorizmu: Federal nyy zakon ot 29 dekabrya 2017 goda №445-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2018. №1 (CHast I). St. 29.
O nekotorykh voprosakh sudebnoy praktiki po ugolovnym delam o prestupleniyakh terroristicheskoy napravlennosti: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 09.02.2012 № 1 (red. ot 03.11.2016) // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2012. № 4. S. 25-30.
Borisov S. V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za publichnye prizyvy i osushchestvleniyu terroristicheskoy deyatel nosti ili publichnoe opravdanie terrorizma // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2007. № 19. S.10-12.
Gruzinskaya E. I. Voprosy nakazuemosti ugolovno-pravovykh deyaniy (na primere nakazuemosti publichnykh prizyvov) // Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy pravovoy akademii. 2014. №3 (3). S. 44-46.
Dannye sudebnoy statistiki elektronnyy resurs . - Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.cdep.ru/index. php id 79.html. - Zagl. s ekrana.
Kibal nik A., Solomonenko I. Publichnye prizyvy k osushchestvleniyu terroristicheskoy deyatel nosti ili publichnoe opravdanie terrorizma // Zakonnost . 2007. № 2. S. 14-16.
Otsenochnye priznaki v Ugolovnom kodekse Rossiyskoy Federatsii: nauchnoe i sudebnoe tolkovanie: Nauchno-prakt. posobie / pod red. A. A. Galakhovoy. M.: Norma, 2014. 736 s.
Prigovor TSentral nogo rayonnogo suda g. KHabarovska № 1-367/2014 ot 19 sentyabrya 2014 g. po delu № 1-367/2014 elektronnyy resurs . - Rezhim dostupa: URL:http://sudact.ru/. - Zagl. s ekrana.
Sostoyanie prestupnosti za yanvar -oktyabr 2016 goda elektronnyy resurs . - Rezhim dostupa: URL: https://mvd.rf/reports/item/8922474/.html. - Zagl. s ekrana.
Tarbagaev A. N., Moskalev G. L. Publichnye prizyvy k osushchestvleniyu terroristicheskoy deyatel nosti (st. 205.2 UK RF): problemy ugolovno-pravovoy reglamentatsii i kvalifikatsii // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Pravo. 2016. Vyp. 2. S. 28-39.
CHrezvychayno zagadochnaya istoriya . Eks-polkovnik GRU poluchil eshche 1,5 goda elektronnyy resurs . - Rezhim dostupa: URL:https://www.bfm.ru/news/362597.html. - Zagl. s ekrana.
CHuchaev A. I., Gracheva YU. V., Zadoyan A. A. Prestupleniya protiv obshchestvennoy bezopasnosti: uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie. M.: Prospekt, 2015. 256 s.
Ugolovnoe delo napravleno v sud elektronnyy resurs . - Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.prokrm.ru/content/view/8651/1.html. - Zagl. s ekrana.
Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Osobennaya chast : uchebnik / pod red. I.E. Zvecharovskogo. M.: YUrist, 2010. 456 s.
SHibzukhov 3. A. Problemy kvalifikatsii publichnykh prizyvov k osushchestvleniyu terroristicheskoy deyatel nosti ili publichnogo opravdaniya terrorizma, sovershennykh v souchastii // Obshchestvo i pravo. 2011. № 2. S. 184 -187.
SHibzukhov Z. A. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za publichnye prizyvy k osushchestvleniyu terroristicheskoy deyatel nosti ili publichnoe opravdanie terrorizma: diss.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2012. 181 s.
O protivodeystvii terrorizmu: Federal nyy zakon Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 6 marta 2006 goda № 35-FZ (v red. ot 06.07.2016 goda) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2006. № 11. St. 1146.
O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii v tselyakh sovershenstvovaniya mer protivodeystviya terrorizmu: Federal nyy zakon ot 29 dekabrya 2017 goda №445-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2018. №1 (CHast I). St. 29.
O nekotorykh voprosakh sudebnoy praktiki po ugolovnym delam o prestupleniyakh terroristicheskoy napravlennosti: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 09.02.2012 № 1 (red. ot 03.11.2016) // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2012. № 4. S. 25-30.
Borisov S. V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za publichnye prizyvy i osushchestvleniyu terroristicheskoy deyatel nosti ili publichnoe opravdanie terrorizma // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2007. № 19. S.10-12.
Gruzinskaya E. I. Voprosy nakazuemosti ugolovno-pravovykh deyaniy (na primere nakazuemosti publichnykh prizyvov) // Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy pravovoy akademii. 2014. №3 (3). S. 44-46.
Dannye sudebnoy statistiki elektronnyy resurs . - Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.cdep.ru/index. php id 79.html. - Zagl. s ekrana.
Kibal nik A., Solomonenko I. Publichnye prizyvy k osushchestvleniyu terroristicheskoy deyatel nosti ili publichnoe opravdanie terrorizma // Zakonnost . 2007. № 2. S. 14-16.
Otsenochnye priznaki v Ugolovnom kodekse Rossiyskoy Federatsii: nauchnoe i sudebnoe tolkovanie: Nauchno-prakt. posobie / pod red. A. A. Galakhovoy. M.: Norma, 2014. 736 s.
Prigovor TSentral nogo rayonnogo suda g. KHabarovska № 1-367/2014 ot 19 sentyabrya 2014 g. po delu № 1-367/2014 elektronnyy resurs . - Rezhim dostupa: URL:http://sudact.ru/. - Zagl. s ekrana.
Sostoyanie prestupnosti za yanvar -oktyabr 2016 goda elektronnyy resurs . - Rezhim dostupa: URL: https://mvd.rf/reports/item/8922474/.html. - Zagl. s ekrana.
Tarbagaev A. N., Moskalev G. L. Publichnye prizyvy k osushchestvleniyu terroristicheskoy deyatel nosti (st. 205.2 UK RF): problemy ugolovno-pravovoy reglamentatsii i kvalifikatsii // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Pravo. 2016. Vyp. 2. S. 28-39.
CHrezvychayno zagadochnaya istoriya . Eks-polkovnik GRU poluchil eshche 1,5 goda elektronnyy resurs . - Rezhim dostupa: URL:https://www.bfm.ru/news/362597.html. - Zagl. s ekrana.
CHuchaev A. I., Gracheva YU. V., Zadoyan A. A. Prestupleniya protiv obshchestvennoy bezopasnosti: uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie. M.: Prospekt, 2015. 256 s.
Ugolovnoe delo napravleno v sud elektronnyy resurs . - Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.prokrm.ru/content/view/8651/1.html. - Zagl. s ekrana.
Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Osobennaya chast : uchebnik / pod red. I.E. Zvecharovskogo. M.: YUrist, 2010. 456 s.
SHibzukhov 3. A. Problemy kvalifikatsii publichnykh prizyvov k osushchestvleniyu terroristicheskoy deyatel nosti ili publichnogo opravdaniya terrorizma, sovershennykh v souchastii // Obshchestvo i pravo. 2011. № 2. S. 184 -187.
SHibzukhov Z. A. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za publichnye prizyvy k osushchestvleniyu terroristicheskoy deyatel nosti ili publichnoe opravdanie terrorizma: diss.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2012. 181 s.
