Constitutional and legal experience of interaction of bicameral parliaments of the CIS countries in the sphere of food security
( Pp. 43-49)

The article presents the author’s analysis of constitutional texts, regulations and analytical materials of the countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States in order to consolidate in them the consolidated powers of the chambers of parliaments associated with the implementation of food security. Analysis of legal acts of the studied group of states showed that the sphere of food security (as part of the agrarian and food sphere/function) is one of the eventual spheres of interaction between the chambers of parliament. In the course of the study, two approaches of states to the formalization of provisions related to food security in constitutional texts were identified. The first approach is to consolidate norms that indirectly affect the field of food security (Belarus, Kazakhstan, Russia); the second - in the absence of such provisions (Tajikistan and Uzbekistan). It has been established that the interaction of the chambers of parliaments in the field of food security is implemented through the adoption of laws, as well as through various parliamentary events (parliamentary hearings, round tables, seminars, meetings, etc.). It is concluded that the available options for interaction between the chambers of parliaments of states in the field of food security reflect their independent approaches, which are developed on the basis of legal doctrine and practice.

Markheim M.V., Bezuglya A.A., (2020), CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL EXPERIENCE OF INTERACTION OF BICAMERAL PARLIAMENTS OF THE CIS COUNTRIES IN THE SPHERE OF FOOD SECURITY. Sociopolitical Sciences, 5 => 43-49.

Minasyan A.A., Nikonova L.I. Konstitutsionnye sfery i formy vzaimodeystviya palat parlamentov: zarubezhnyy opyt // Nauka i obrazovanie: khozyaystvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel stvo; pravo i upravlenie. 2016. № 11 (78). S. 82-87.
Minasyan A.A. Zakonodatel naya i kontrol naya sfery kak elementy mekhanizma vzaimodeystviya palat Federal nogo Sobraniya Rossii // Pravo i gosudarstvo v sovremennom mire: sostoyanie, problemy, tendentsii razvitiya: Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-teoreticheskoy konferentsii. V Mezhdunar. Mal tsevskie chteniya - pamyati zasluzhennogo deyatelya nauki Rossiyskoy Federatsii, chl.-korr. RAN, d-ra yurid. nauk, prof. Mal tseva Gennadiya Vasil evicha (Belgorod, 28 aprelya 2018 g.). Belgorod: OOO GiK , 2018. S. 83-89.
Markhgeym M.V., Minasyan A.A. Vzaimodeystvie palat Federal nogo Sobraniya Rossii: konstitutsionno-pravovye parametry i resursy optimizatsii. M.: YUrlitinform, 2019. 144 s.
Revenko L.S. Global naya prodovol stvennaya bezopasnost : ugrozy kratkosrochnogo perioda // Portal MGIMO. https://mgimo.ru/about/news/experts/globalnayaprodovolstvennaya-bezopasnost-ugrozy-kratkosrochnogo-perioda/ (data obrashcheniya: 26.10.2020).
Prodovol stvennaya i sel skokhozyaystvennaya organizatsiya Ob edinennykh Natsiy // FAO, MFSR, YUNISEF, VPP i VOZ. 2019. Polozhenie del v oblasti prodovol stvennoy bezopasnosti i pitaniya v mire - 2019. Mery zashchity ot zamedleniya rosta ekonomiki i ekonomicheskikh spadov. Rim, FAO. http://www.fao.org/3/ca5162ru/ca5162ru.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 26.10.2020).
Esterik P.V. Right to food; right to feed; right to be fed. The intersection of women s rights and the right to food // Agriculture and Human. 1999. Vol. 16. Pp. 225-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007524722792
Tikhomirova V.A. Prodovol stvennaya bezopasnost : ponyatie i sushchnost // Vestnik REU im. G.V. Plekhanova. 2015. № 6 (84). S. 123-128.
Schmidhuber J., Tubiello F.N. Global food security under climate change // Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. December 11, 2007. Vol. 104. No. 50. Pp. 19703-19708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701976104
Wheeler J. von Braun. Climate change impacts on global food security // Science. Aug. 2, 2013. Vol. 341. Issue 6145. Pp. 508-513. DOI: 10.1126/science.1239402.
King Th., Cole M., Farber J.M. et al. Food safety for food security: Relationship between global megatrends and developments in food safety // Trends in Food Science Technology. October 2017. Vol. 68. Pp. 160-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.tifs.2017.08.014
Bommarco R., Vico G., Hallin S. Exploiting ecosystem services in agriculture for increased food security // Global Food Security. June 2018. Vol. 17. Pp. 57-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2018.04.001.
Waha K., van Wijk M.T., Fritz S. et al. Agricultural diversification as an important strategy for achieving food security in Africa // Glob. Change Biol. 2018. No. 24. Pp. 3390-3400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14158
Iaquinto B.L. Working holiday makers in Australia: food security, climate change, and the backpacker tax // Geographical Research. February 2018. Vol. 56. Issue 1. Pp. 107-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12261
Coleman-Jensen A., Coleman-Jensen G. et al. Food security in the United States in 2013 // USDA-ERS Economic Research Report. September 1, 2014. No. 173. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract 2504067
Ford J.D., Berrang-Ford L. Food insecurity in Igloolik, Nunavut: An exploratory study // Polar Record. 2009. Vol. 45. Issue 3. Pp. 225-236 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247408008048

food security, agrarian and food function/sphere, parliament, interaction of bicameral parliaments of the CIS countries.