The special features of the interpretation of the socio-political doctrine of liberalism in the Western European, American and Russian traditions in the 18th and 19th centuries: common and special
( Pp. 54-62)

The article strives to conceptualize the basic ideas of liberalism, free from political sensitivities, emotional judgments and naive simplifications based on different methods and techniques of political and historical science, as well as general scientific approaches - a comparative historical method, a normative approach, an institutional approach, and analytical and synthetic methods. Defects of the interpretation of liberalism in Russia - opposition of “liberals” and “patriots”, domestic perceptions of liberalism as freedom in family, sexual and gender life, reduction of liberalism to the specific historical direction of post-Soviet liberalism are revealed in the paper. Furthermore, the author draws attention to the misunderstanding of liberalism in the United States: one of them refers liberalism to the social democracy, the other equates liberalism with the totalitarian teachings. In the light of the incorrect perception of liberalism in the world, the author formulates the purpose of the work as overcoming the misjudgement of liberalism by overcoming the false appreciation of liberalism by forming a concentrated view of the fundamentals of liberal socio-political teachings based on the views of leading thinkers in Western Europe, the United States of America and Russia in the 18th and 19th centuries. Which contributed significantly to the development of the fundamentals of liberalism. Predicated on the analysis of the ideas of Western European, American, and Russian liberal thinkers of the past, the author identifies common and special features of the interpretation of liberalism in different parts of the world over two centuries. Finally, the author concludes that the main features of the original liberalism are the basic points of the classical liberalism of the past centuries are the following points: 1) intelligent people should have unconditional personal, political and economic rights independent of the state; 2) there must be a system in the state that promotes justice and limits the state itself; 3) all people have the right to form a state and influences it.

Zubov V.V., (2020), THE SPECIAL FEATURES OF THE INTERPRETATION OF THE SOCIO-POLITICAL DOCTRINE OF LIBERALISM IN THE WESTERN EUROPEAN, AMERICAN AND RUSSIAN TRADITIONS IN THE 18TH AND 19TH CENTURIES: COMMON AND SPECIAL. Sociopolitical Sciences, 6 => 54-62.

Aven P.O. Vremya Berezovskogo. M.: Izdatel stvo AST: CORPUS, 2018. 816 s.
Rimini R. Kratkaya istoriya SSHA. M.: KoLibri, Azbuka- Attikus, 2019. 480 s.
Groysberg A.I., Kondrat eva K.S., Skiperskikh A.V. ZH.-ZH. Russo vs B. Konstan: nesostoyavshiysya dialog o svobode // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Politologiya. 2018. № 2. S. 172-185.
Iksanov I.S. Vliyanie amerikanskikh i frantsuzskikh konstitutsionnykh idey na institut sovremennogo grazhdanstva // Fundamental noe nauchnoe znanie. 2020. № 1. T. 10. S. 51-56.
Kovalev A.A., Knyazeva E.YU. Ieremiya Bentam o teorii organizatsii, prinyatii upravlencheskikh resheniy, gosudarstvennom upravlenii i politiki: istoriya i sovremennost // Management issues. 2020. № 3 (64). S. 6-19.
Konovalov A.A., ZHurtova A.A., Kandrokova F.S. Kontseptual nye osnovy russkogo i evropeyskogo liberalizma vtoroy poloviny XIX v. v sravnitel noy perspektive // Manuskript. 2020. № 5. T. 13. S. 82-87.
Lebedev V.A. Demokratiya i liberalizm: problemnye aspekty sootnosheniya // Voprosy rossiyskoy yustitsii. 2020. № 8. S. 63-76.
Oganis yan YU.S. Postsovetskiy liberalizm: ot reformy k revolyutsii // Vlast . 2020. № 2. T. 28. S. 168-175.
Sirotinskaya M.M. Aleksis de Tokvil , Fransua Gizo: u istokov amerikanskoy isklyuchitel nosti // Amerikanistika: Aktual nye podkhody i sovremennye issledovaniya. 2020. № 12. S. 333-344.
Spirova E.M. Konservatizm vs liberalizm // Vek globalizatsii. 2016. № 4. S. 13-22.
Filippov A.R. Aksiomaticheskiy metod poznaniya prirody prav cheloveka // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2017. № 3. S. 318-322.
Deneen P. Why liberalism failed. Yale University Press, 2018. 248 p.
Freeden M. Liberalism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press, 2015. 144 p.
Legutko R. The demon in democracy: Totalitarian temptations in free societies. Encounter Books, 2018. 200 p.
Nazony Y. The virtue of nationalism. Basic Books, 2018. 304 p.
Siedentop L. Inventing the individual: The origins of western liberalism. Penguin, 2015. 448 p.

the doctrine of liberalism, utilitarianism, positivism, federalism, Republicans, nobility liberalism, territorial liberalism, bourgeois liberalism.