The problem of constitutionalism in domestic constitutional projects of the second half of the XVIII century
( Pp. 21-27)
More about authors
Shulzhenko Yuriy Leonidovich
Dr.Sci.(Law), professor, Chief Researcher, Department of Constitutional Law and Constitutional Justice, Russian Academy of Sciences, Honored lawyer of Russian Federation
Institute of the State and Law
Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Institute of the State and Law
Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Abstract:
Today, one of the most important, most difficult tasks in Russia is the development, improvement of real, practical constitutionalism. For its successful solution, of great importance is the study, taking into account the historical experience of our country in this area. And it is precisely in this that the relevance of the presented article lies, which is devoted to the analysis of the first domestic constitutional projects that appeared in the second half of the 18th century, the consolidation, regulation of the institutions of constitutionalism in them, their possibility of using, of course, with appropriate amendments in modern conditions. Note that these issues have been and remain in the focus of attention of foreign scientists, for example, D.L. Ransel, S.N. Wittaker, C.S. Lenard, M. Raev,Bartolissi.The author’s approach to the very concept of “constitutionalism” as a multilateral phenomenon associated with the real presence of the constitution is presented; practical constitutionalism; theoretical constitutionalism. The characteristic of constitutional drafts, theprovisionscontainedinthem, concerningconstitutionalismofrepresentativesofvariouskindsofcurrentsofpoliticalandlegalthought of the second half of the 18th century, and especially the nobility, enlightenment, and popular movement, is given. Based on the analysis, it is concluded that, first of all, in the Russian constitutional projects of that time, three most important institutes of constitutionalism are fixed - representation, and in this regard, representative democracy, parliamentarism; self management; separation of powers. Their contents are disclosed. Note that all these three institutions are present in modern Russia. But the question of their improvement, real effective functioning remains in demand. First of all, three fundamental research methods were used in the work: dogmatic; historical and legal; comparative legal. The article is of interest to government officials, students, university professors, researchers, all those who are interested in issues of constitutional law of the Russian Federation, the domestic history of the state and law.
How to Cite:
Shulzhenko Y.L., (2020), THE PROBLEM OF CONSTITUTIONALISM IN DOMESTIC CONSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS OF THE SECOND HALF OF THE XVIII CENTURY. Sociopolitical Sciences, 1 => 21-27.
Reference list:
Vladimirskiy-Budanov M.F. Obzor istorii russkogo prava. 6-e izd. Kiev: Izd. knigoprodavtsa N.YA. Ogloblina; Tip. t-va I.N. Kushnerev i Ko, 1909. 699 s.
Gratsianskiy P.S. Konstitutsionnye proekty Rossii vtoroy poloviny XVIII v. // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1980. № 7. S. 87-95.
Istoriya politicheskikh i pravovykh ucheniy: uchebnik dlya vuzov / pod obshch. red. prof. O.V. Martyshina. M.: Norma, 2004. 899 s.
Manifest ob uchrezhdenii Imperatorskogo Soveta i razdelenii Senata na departamenty // Sb. Russkogo istor. ob-va. SPb., 1871. T. VIII. S. 202-217.
Obshchestvennye dvizheniya v Rossii v pervoy polovine XIX veka. T. 1. SPb.: Gerol d, 1905. 496 s.
Romanovich-Slavatinskiy A.V. Sistema russkogo gosudarstvennogo prava v ego istoriko-dogmaticheskom razvitii sravnitel no s gosudarstvennym pravom zapadnykh stran. CH. 1: Osnovnye gosudarstvennye zakony. Kiev , 1886. 299 s.
Rossiyskiy konstitutsionalizm v kontekste istoriko-pravovykh issledovaniy: sb. nauch. tr. SPb.: Prezidentskaya biblioteka imeni B.N. El tsina, 2014. 227 s.
SHul zhenko YU.L. Ocherk rossiyskogo konstitutsionalizma monarkhicheskogo perioda. M.: Institut gosudarstva i prava RAN, 2008. 144 s.
SHumigorskiy E.S. Imperator Pavel I. ZHizn i tsarstvovanie. SPb.: Tip. V.D. Smirnova, 1907. 264 s.
YAkushkin V.E. Gosudarstvennaya vlast i proekty gosudarstvennoy reformy v Rossii. SPb.: Izdanie G.F. L vovicha, 1906. 160 s.
Ransel D.L. The politics of Catherine Russia. The Panin party. New Haven and London: Reuters, 1975. 331 p.
Whittaker C.H. The reforming Tsar: The redefinition of autocratic duty eighteenth - Centure Russia. Slavic Review. 1992. Vol. 51. No. 1.
Gratsianskiy P.S. Konstitutsionnye proekty Rossii vtoroy poloviny XVIII v. // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1980. № 7. S. 87-95.
Istoriya politicheskikh i pravovykh ucheniy: uchebnik dlya vuzov / pod obshch. red. prof. O.V. Martyshina. M.: Norma, 2004. 899 s.
Manifest ob uchrezhdenii Imperatorskogo Soveta i razdelenii Senata na departamenty // Sb. Russkogo istor. ob-va. SPb., 1871. T. VIII. S. 202-217.
Obshchestvennye dvizheniya v Rossii v pervoy polovine XIX veka. T. 1. SPb.: Gerol d, 1905. 496 s.
Romanovich-Slavatinskiy A.V. Sistema russkogo gosudarstvennogo prava v ego istoriko-dogmaticheskom razvitii sravnitel no s gosudarstvennym pravom zapadnykh stran. CH. 1: Osnovnye gosudarstvennye zakony. Kiev , 1886. 299 s.
Rossiyskiy konstitutsionalizm v kontekste istoriko-pravovykh issledovaniy: sb. nauch. tr. SPb.: Prezidentskaya biblioteka imeni B.N. El tsina, 2014. 227 s.
SHul zhenko YU.L. Ocherk rossiyskogo konstitutsionalizma monarkhicheskogo perioda. M.: Institut gosudarstva i prava RAN, 2008. 144 s.
SHumigorskiy E.S. Imperator Pavel I. ZHizn i tsarstvovanie. SPb.: Tip. V.D. Smirnova, 1907. 264 s.
YAkushkin V.E. Gosudarstvennaya vlast i proekty gosudarstvennoy reformy v Rossii. SPb.: Izdanie G.F. L vovicha, 1906. 160 s.
Ransel D.L. The politics of Catherine Russia. The Panin party. New Haven and London: Reuters, 1975. 331 p.
Whittaker C.H. The reforming Tsar: The redefinition of autocratic duty eighteenth - Centure Russia. Slavic Review. 1992. Vol. 51. No. 1.
Keywords:
constitution, constitutionalism, parliamentarism, enlightenment, separation of powers, self-government.