Globalization and Westernization: Horizons of “identification” and “discrimination”
( Pp. 106-114)

The scientific relevance of distinguishing between “globalization” and “westernization” is due to the political requirement for the implementation of the “world economic order” in the liberal version of the “economic paradigm” (J. Agamben) of the social. Methodologically, one should distinguish between scientific/disciplinary analysis and philosophical interpretation of globalization; “Distinction” (“drawing boundaries”) is the exclusive prerogative of philosophy (M. Heidegger) and presupposes the presence of the concept of globalization (“radical metaphysical concept”) as “the unity of reality and meaning” the condition for the possibility of a «radical concept» is the ordering of perspectives/points of view in the horizon of a certain paradigm of the social; the dominance of the “economic paradigm” in Western European social science determines the formulation of the question regarding the subject of research, the way of its thematization and the area in which the distinction between “globalization” and “Westernization” is important: Westernization is a necessary aspect of globalization as a world order, along with “excluded localities” defined as a result of interpretation as “bipolar”; the distinction between “material” and “cosmological” values (in the terminology of D. Lala) presupposes the homogenization of the world order and the interpretation of “features” in terms of culture; the “remnant” not reduced to culture is interpreted as “absolutely different” and “locked up” in locality as a “prison” (Z. Bauman); sustainability is provided as a “balancing equilibrium” of the Westernized (“universal”) and “other” (“locality”) levels of the world order; the redistribution of power between the main actors/competitors of a single world order does not have a significant impact and is not relevant for distinguishing between “globalization” and “westernization” in terms of philosophical interpretation; “Civilizational paradigm” (S. Huntington) and “planetarism” (existential-historical thinking of M. Heidegger) are marginal for the approach to the study of globalization prevailing in the “positive sciences”, but they are of fundamental importance for its philosophical interpretation.

Maltsev K.G., Maltseva A.V., Lomako L.L., (2020), GLOBALIZATION AND WESTERNIZATION: HORIZONS OF “IDENTIFICATION” AND “DISCRIMINATION”. Sociopolitical Sciences, 5 => 106-114.

Agamben Dzh. Homo sacer. CHrezvychaynoe polozhenie. M.: Evropa, 2011. 148 s.
Agamben Dzh. TSarstvo i slava. K teologicheskoy genealogii ekonomiki i upravleniya. M.; SPb: Izd-vo In-ta Gaydara; Fakul tet svobodnykh iskusstv i nauk SPbGU, 2018. 552 s.
Ankersmit F.R. Politicheskaya reprezentatsiya. M.: Izd. dom Gos. un-ta Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki , 2012. 288 c.
Arrigi Dzh. Adam Smit v Pekine. CHto poluchil v nasledstvo XXI vek. M.: In-t obshchestvennogo proektirovaniya, 2009. 456 s.
Bauman Z. Globalizatsiya. Posledstviya dlya cheloveka i obshchestva. M.: Ves Mir, 2004. 188 s.
Bek U. Kosmopoliticheskoe mirovozzrenie. M.: TSentr issledovaniy postindustrial nogo obshchestva, 2008. 336 s.
Bek U. CHto takoe globalizatsiya M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2001. 304 s.
Veber M. Osnovnye sotsiologicheskie ponyatiya // Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M.: Progress, 1990. S. 602-643.
Veber M. Sotsiologiya // Veber M. KHozyaystvo i obshchestvo: ocherki ponimayushchey sotsiologii. V 4-kh tt. T. I. M.: Izd. dom Gos. un-ta Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki , 2016. 445 s.
Gegel G.V.F. Lektsii po filosofii istorii. SPb.: Nauka, 2000. 480 s.
Gegel G.V.F. Filosofiya prava. M.: Mysl , 1990. 524 s.
ZHizhek S. O nasilii. M.: Evropa, 2010. 184 s.
Lal D. Pokhvala imperii: Globalizatsiya i poryadok. M.: Novoe izdatel stvo, 2010. 364 s.
Lindsi B. Globalizatsiya: povtorenie proydennogo. Neopredelennoe budushchee global nogo kapitalizma. M.: IRISEN, 2006. 415 s.
Mal tsev K.G., Mal tseva A.V., Lomako L.L. Ponyatie politicheskogo i mirovoy besporyadok : perspektivy soglasiya, voyny i global nogo imperskogo poryadka. Belgorod: Izd-vo BGTU im. V.G. SHukhova, 2020. 914 s.
Mann M. Stanovlenie klassov i natsiy-gosudarstv, 1760-1914 gody // Mann M. Istochniki sotsial noy vlasti. V 4-kh tt. T. 2. CH. 1, 2. M.: Delo, 2018. 503 s. 507 s.
Mann M. Globalizatsii, 1945-2011 gody // Mann M. Istochniki sotsial noy vlasti. V 4-kh tt. T. 4. M.: Delo, 2019. 664 s.
Polan i K. Velikaya transformatsiya. Politicheskie i ekonomicheskie istoki nashego vremeni. SPb.: Aleteyya, 2002. 320 s.
Rozanov V.V. Listva. Uedinennoe. Opavshie list ya. Ukazateli // Rozanov V.V. Sobr. soch. T. 30. M.: Respublika; SPb.: Rostok, 2010. 591 s.
Smit A. Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov. M.: Sotsekgiz, 1962. 684 s.
Fukuyama F. Konets istorii i posledniy chelovek. M: ACT: ACT Moskva: Poligrafizdat, 2010. 588 s.
KHaydegger M. Nitsshe. T. 1. SPb.: Vladimir Dal , 2006. 608 s.
KHaydegger M. Razmyshleniya II-VI (CHernye tetradi 1931-1938). M.: Izd-vo In-ta Gaydara, 2016. 584 s.
KHaydegger M. Razmyshleniya VII-XI (CHernye tetradi 1938-1939). M.: Izd-vo In-ta Gaydara, 2018. 528 s.
KHantington S. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsiy. M.: OOO Izdatel stvo ACT , 2003. 603 s.
KHardt M., Negri A. Imperiya. M.: Praksis, 2004. 440 s.
SHmitt K. Dukhovno-istoricheskoe sostoyanie sovremennogo parlamentarizma // SHmitt K. Politicheskaya teologiya. M.: Kanon-Press-TS, 2000a. C. 155-258
SHmitt K. Nomos Zemli v prave narodov Jus publicum Europaeum. SPb.: Vladimir Dal , 2008. 669 s.
SHmitt K. Politicheskaya teologiya // SHmitt K. Politicheskaya teologiya. M.: Kanon-Press-TS, 2000b. C. 7-98.
SHmitt K. Ponyatie politicheskogo // SHmitt K. Ponyatie politicheskogo. SPb.: Nauka, 2016. C. 280-408.
SHpengler O. Geshtal t i deystvitel nost // SHpengler O. Zakat Evropy. T. 1. M.: Mysl , 1998. 663 s.
El ster YU. Kislyy vinograd: Issledovanie provalov ratsional nosti. M.: Izd-vo In-ta Gaydara, 2018. 296 s.
Kennedy P. The rise and fall of the great powers. London. Fontana Press, 1989.
Rowls J. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996. 525 r.

globalization, westernization, value assignment and evaluation, economic paradigm, world economic order, liberal metaphysics, “cultural identity”, global political order.