Values of All-Russian Societal Organizations of Disabled People in Interaction With State Authorities
( Pp. 39-51)
More about authors
Bugrovsky Aleksandr I.
junior researcher at the ITMO University’s AI Research Center “Strong AI in Industry”
ITMO University’s AI Research Center “Strong AI in Industry”
St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
ITMO University’s AI Research Center “Strong AI in Industry”
St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Abstract:
Studying the issues of interaction between authorities and social and political groups there is a gap of understanding which values All-Russian organizations of disabled are guided in interaction with state authorities on the issues of social protection of the disabled. This article is devoted to answer this question by analyzing values of All-Russian Societies of Disabled, Blind, Deaf broadcasted in interaction with the state authorities on the level of collective actors. The study presented a methodology of values’ analysis. The array of data was collected, and a mixed analysis was carried out - content analysis of documents and a quantitative analysis of values indicators, and its visualization. The study traced dominance of “dominant” type of values on “minor” types that confirmed the results of World Value Survey on example of the conservative NGOs and state authorities’ interaction in Russian third sector. A mixed analysis of the values of representatives of All-Russian Societies of Disabled, Blind and Deaf in interaction with state authorities revealed that the existing values form the standard of norms, rules and practices that do not contribute to changing the model of interaction between All-Russian Societies of Disabled and state authorities, thereby persisting inertia in the institutes of interaction between the organizations and state authorities.
How to Cite:
Bugrovsky A.I., (2022), VALUES OF ALL-RUSSIAN SOCIETAL ORGANIZATIONS OF DISABLED PEOPLE IN INTERACTION WITH STATE AUTHORITIES. Sociopolitical Sciences, 3 => 39-51.
Reference list:
Auzan A. National values and modernization. OGI, 2010.
Bugrovskii A. All-Russian societies of people with disabilities: The nature of inertia in interaction with state authorities. Zhurnal issledovanij socialnoj politiki. 2021. Vol. 19. No. 4. Pp. 685-700. (In Rus.)
Website World Values Survey [Electronic source]. URL: https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSContents.jsp (data of accesses: 20.03.22).
VOG. Documents [Electronic source]. URL: https://voginfo.ru/about/docs/ (Accessed: 05.04.2022).
VOI. Reports [Electronic source]. URL: http://www.voi.ru/dokumenty/otchety (data of accesses: 15.04.2022).
VOS. Reference materials [Electronic source]. URL: https://www.vos.org.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=421&Itemid=449 (data of accesses: 17.04.2022).
Newspaper “Kontakt-Inform” SPB VOI. No. 12 [Electronic source]. URL: http://voi.spb.ru/files/kinform/ki-2019/kif-12-2019.pdf (data of accesses: 15.04.22).
Indolev L. A brief history of the disabled movement in Russia (1921-2000) [Electronic source]. URL: https://2017.perspektiva-inva.ru/hist-soc-mov/2275-vw-2275 (data of accesses: 12.04.2022).
Information about the work of regional organizations VOI 2011-2016 [Electronic source]. URL: http://www.voi.ru/o_nas/otchety (data of accesses: 10.04.2022).
Martyanov V., Fishman L. Ethics of virtue for new estates: Transformation of political morality in Modern Russia. Voprosy filosofii. 2016. No. 10. Pp. 58-68. (In Rus.)
Sungurov A. Models of interaction between structures of civil society and authorities: Russian experience. Modernization of the Economy and Globalization. 2009. No. 3. Pp. 500-508. (In Rus.)
Fröhlich C. Balancing on the brink: Russian NGOs working with people with disabilities between foreign sponsors and domestic politics. Zhurnal issledovanij social’noy politiki. 2010. Vol. 8. No. 2. Pp. 165-184. (In Rus.)
Alexander A., Inglehart R., Welzel C. Measuring effective democracy: A defense // International Political Science Review. 2012. Vol. 33. No. 1. Pp. 41-62.
Cook L. Russia s welfare regime: The shift toward statism. In: Gazing at welfare, gender and agency in post-socialist countries. 2011. Pp. 14-35.
Deutsch M. The disadvantaged child and the learning process: Some social, psychological, and developmental considerations. In: Education in depressed areas. A. Passow (ed.). New York: Teachers College. 1963.
DiMaggio P. Culture and economy: The handbook of economic sociology. N.J. Smelser, R. Swedberg (eds.). Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994. Pp. 27-57.
Huntington S. Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968.
Inglehart R. Modernization, existential security and cultural change: Reshaping human motivations and society in Forthcoming. In: Advances in culture and psychology. M. Gelfand, C.Y. Chiu, Y.-Y. Hong (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Inglehart R. The silent revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977.
Inglehart R., Welzel C. Modernization, cultural change, and democracy the human development sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge Press, 2005.
Lipset S. The value patterns of democracy: A case study in comparative analysis // American Sociological Review. 1963. Pp. 515-531.
Meyer J., Boli J., Thomas G., Ramirez F. World society and the nation-state // American Journal of Sociology. 1997. Vol. 103. Pp. 144-181.
Persson T., Tabellini G. Democratic capital: The nexus of political and economic change // American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics. 2009. Vol. 1. No. 2. Pp. 88-126.
Putnam R. The prosperous community: Social capital and public life // The American Prospect. 1993. No. 13. Pp. 35-42.
Pye L., Verba S. Political culture and political development. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963.
Rokeach M. The nature of human values. Free press, 1973.
Schwartz S., Bilsky W. Toward a universal psychological structure of human values // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1987. Vol. 53. No. 3. Pp. 550, 878.
Bugrovskii A. All-Russian societies of people with disabilities: The nature of inertia in interaction with state authorities. Zhurnal issledovanij socialnoj politiki. 2021. Vol. 19. No. 4. Pp. 685-700. (In Rus.)
Website World Values Survey [Electronic source]. URL: https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSContents.jsp (data of accesses: 20.03.22).
VOG. Documents [Electronic source]. URL: https://voginfo.ru/about/docs/ (Accessed: 05.04.2022).
VOI. Reports [Electronic source]. URL: http://www.voi.ru/dokumenty/otchety (data of accesses: 15.04.2022).
VOS. Reference materials [Electronic source]. URL: https://www.vos.org.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=421&Itemid=449 (data of accesses: 17.04.2022).
Newspaper “Kontakt-Inform” SPB VOI. No. 12 [Electronic source]. URL: http://voi.spb.ru/files/kinform/ki-2019/kif-12-2019.pdf (data of accesses: 15.04.22).
Indolev L. A brief history of the disabled movement in Russia (1921-2000) [Electronic source]. URL: https://2017.perspektiva-inva.ru/hist-soc-mov/2275-vw-2275 (data of accesses: 12.04.2022).
Information about the work of regional organizations VOI 2011-2016 [Electronic source]. URL: http://www.voi.ru/o_nas/otchety (data of accesses: 10.04.2022).
Martyanov V., Fishman L. Ethics of virtue for new estates: Transformation of political morality in Modern Russia. Voprosy filosofii. 2016. No. 10. Pp. 58-68. (In Rus.)
Sungurov A. Models of interaction between structures of civil society and authorities: Russian experience. Modernization of the Economy and Globalization. 2009. No. 3. Pp. 500-508. (In Rus.)
Fröhlich C. Balancing on the brink: Russian NGOs working with people with disabilities between foreign sponsors and domestic politics. Zhurnal issledovanij social’noy politiki. 2010. Vol. 8. No. 2. Pp. 165-184. (In Rus.)
Alexander A., Inglehart R., Welzel C. Measuring effective democracy: A defense // International Political Science Review. 2012. Vol. 33. No. 1. Pp. 41-62.
Cook L. Russia s welfare regime: The shift toward statism. In: Gazing at welfare, gender and agency in post-socialist countries. 2011. Pp. 14-35.
Deutsch M. The disadvantaged child and the learning process: Some social, psychological, and developmental considerations. In: Education in depressed areas. A. Passow (ed.). New York: Teachers College. 1963.
DiMaggio P. Culture and economy: The handbook of economic sociology. N.J. Smelser, R. Swedberg (eds.). Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994. Pp. 27-57.
Huntington S. Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968.
Inglehart R. Modernization, existential security and cultural change: Reshaping human motivations and society in Forthcoming. In: Advances in culture and psychology. M. Gelfand, C.Y. Chiu, Y.-Y. Hong (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Inglehart R. The silent revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977.
Inglehart R., Welzel C. Modernization, cultural change, and democracy the human development sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge Press, 2005.
Lipset S. The value patterns of democracy: A case study in comparative analysis // American Sociological Review. 1963. Pp. 515-531.
Meyer J., Boli J., Thomas G., Ramirez F. World society and the nation-state // American Journal of Sociology. 1997. Vol. 103. Pp. 144-181.
Persson T., Tabellini G. Democratic capital: The nexus of political and economic change // American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics. 2009. Vol. 1. No. 2. Pp. 88-126.
Putnam R. The prosperous community: Social capital and public life // The American Prospect. 1993. No. 13. Pp. 35-42.
Pye L., Verba S. Political culture and political development. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963.
Rokeach M. The nature of human values. Free press, 1973.
Schwartz S., Bilsky W. Toward a universal psychological structure of human values // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1987. Vol. 53. No. 3. Pp. 550, 878.
Keywords:
All-Russian Societies of Disabled, Blind and Deaf, societal organizations and state interactions, public values.
Related Articles
