Restrictive form of constitutional and legal guarantee of mass media freedom
( Pp. 62-66)

The article substantiates the author's approach to the guaranteeing potential of a restrictive form of regulation of mass media freedom. The relevance of searching for such guarantees is justified by the high level of development of the information society - getting information from traditional formats is being replaced by online sources. In this regard, issues of balance in guaranteeing not only freedom of the media and other subjective rights, but also ensuring information security come to the fore. As a result of the author's analysis of Russian legislation, the following types of guarantees of freedom of the mass media, set out in a restrictive way: prohibition of censorship of mass media; inadmissibility of abuse of freedom of the mass media; life and health of children and minors as restrictive and prohibitive grounds for dissemination of information; defamation of the right of a journalist in the constitutional and legal plane.

Tulnev M.A., (2020), RESTRICTIVE FORM OF CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL GUARANTEE OF MASS MEDIA FREEDOM. Sociopolitical Sciences, 3 => 62-66.

Alekseev I.A., Svistunov A.A., Stankevich G.V. i dr. Administrativnoe pravo: uchebnik. Elektronnyy resurs . M.: Prospekt, 2016.
Borovikov V.B., Borovikova V.V. Sredstva massovoy informatsii i preduprezhdenie prestupleniy nesovershennoletnikh // Biznes v zakone. Ekonomiko-yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2015. № 5. S. 116-121.
Zakharova N.A., Korzhov V.YU., Kayl A.N. Kommentariy k Zakonu RF ot 27 dekabrya 1991 g. № 2124-1 O sredstvakh massovoy informatsii (postateynyy) // SPS Konsul tantPlyus, 2018.
Zgonnikov P.P. Pravovaya priroda ogranicheniy prav // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2019. № 4. S. 46-49.
Kommentariy k Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy) / pod red. V.D. Zor kina. M.: Norma, Infra-M, 2011. 1008 c.
Kulikova S.A. Konstitutsionnyy zapret tsenzury: ponyatie, priznaki i garantii // Informatsionnoe pravo. 2011. № 2. S. 12-16.
Mal ko A.V. Stimuly i ogranicheniya v prave. M., 2005, 250 c.
Markar yan R.V. Osnovnye napravleniya sovershenstvovaniya pravovoy zashchity detey ot rasprostraneniya cherez informatsionno-kommunikatsionnye seti informatsii, prichinyayushchey vred ikh zdorov yu i razvitiyu // Voprosy yuvenal noy yustitsii. 2012. № 4. S. 11-13.
Novikova A.E. Zapret kak forma ob ektivatsii pravozashchitnykh riskov // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. 2019. № 9 (177). S. 12-14.
Osnovnye mezhdunarodnye normy, otnosyashchiesya k svobode vyrazheniya mneniy // Rossiyskiy byulleten po pravam cheloveka. 2001. № 14.
Potapenko S. Institut diffamatsii i rossiyskoe zakonodatel stvo // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2002. № 6. S. 33-35.
Rybakov O.YU., Rybakova O.S. Rebenok i internet-prostranstvo: voprosy pravovogo obespecheniya bezopasnosti // Informatsionnoe pravo. 2018. № 1. S. 27-31.
Smirnova A.A. Diffamatsiya kak zloupotreblenie svobodoy slova i informatsii (konstitutsionno-pravovoy aspekt) // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal noe pravo. 2007. № 9. S. 7-9.
Sobolev O.V. Sootnoshenie zapretov i ogranicheniy prav grazhdan v administrativnoy deyatel nosti organov ispolnitel noy vlasti // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2019. № 2. S. 77-81.
Tumanov A.I. TSenzura v kinematografe kak instrument informatsionnogo protivoborstva // Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki. 2019. № 6. S. 44-50.
SHel menkov V.N. O kharakteristike Federal nogo zakona O zashchite detey ot informatsii, prichinyayushchey vred ikh zdorov yu i razvitiyu // Administrativnoe i munitsipal noe pravo, 2012. № 2. S. 75-79.

freedom of speech, mass media, legal restrictions, prohibitions, censorship.