The Phenomenon of Social Framing of History: The Substance and Specificity of its Manifestation in Modern Society
( Pp. 119-126)

The purpose of the research. The study goes into the problems of Russian society’s formation of the historical consciousness. The autor analyses various social practices as a tool for constructing historical reality. The purpose of the study is to identify the essential and meaningful features of social construction of history’ practices, as well as the specifics of their manifestation in the conditions of the modern Russian society development. Results. As a result of the study, the author comes to the point that in the context of the informational war unleashed against Russia, certain representatives of the Western elite are implementing special social programs aimed at dismantling, replacing and falsifying the most significant events of the historical past of the Russian people, in order to manipulate its public consciousness.

Pichugin V.G., Kaftan V.V., (2022), THE PHENOMENON OF SOCIAL FRAMING OF HISTORY: THE SUBSTANCE AND SPECIFICITY OF ITS MANIFESTATION IN MODERN SOCIETY. Sociopolitical Sciences, 1 => 119-126.

Berger P., Lukman T. Social construction of reality. Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge. Moscow, 1995. P. 69-70.
Gryaznov A.F. Ethical problems in the works of L. Wittgenstein. In: Historical and Philosophical Yearbook. Moscow, 1989. Pp. 235-238.
Derrida J. Letter and Difference. St. Petersburg, 2000. C. 426.
Dawkins R. Egoistic gene. M.: Mir, 1993. P. 178.
Goodman N. Fact, fantasy, prediction. Methods of creating worlds. Moscow, 2001.
Ilnitsky A.M. The mental war of Russia. URL: https://amicable.ru/news/2021/08/02/19513/russia-mental-war/ (data of acces-ses: 02.21.2021).
Liotar J.-F. The state of postmodernism. Moscow; St. Peters-burg, 1998.
Levinson J.K. How to break the marketing blockade. URL: http://www.marketing.spb.ru/lib-comm/advert/meme.htm (data of accesses: 02.21.2021).
Memomedia: “Kus for Russia”. URL: https://memepedia.ru/kus-za-rus-smert-veshhego-olega / (data of accesses: 02.21.2021).
Nietzsche F. Human, too human; Cheerful Science; Evil Wisdom: Sat. Minsk: Medley, 1997.
Orwell J. 1984. Moscow: Eksmo., 2021.
Pereslegin S.B. History as a subject of management. URL: https://zavtra.ru/blogs/istoriya_kak_predmet_upravleniya (data of accesses: 02.21.2021).
Petrov D.Yu. About history management. URL: https://www.gazeta.ru/comments/column/s77419/14147725.shtml (data of accesses: 02.21.2021).
Rashkoff D. Mediavirus: How pop culture secretly influences your consciousness. Moscow, 2003.
Shnirelman V.A. Wars of memory: Myths, identity and politics in Transcaucasia. Moscow: Akademkniga, 2003.
Schutz A. The semantic structure of the everyday world. Moscow, 2003. Pp. 37-38.
Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary. Moscow, 1989. P. 488.
Glasersfeld E. von. Radical consrtructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Falmer Press, London, 1995. P. 26.
Glasersfeld E. von. Wege des Wissens. Konstruktivistische Erkundugen durch unser Denken. Carl-Auer-Systeme Verlag, Heidelberg, 1998. P. 18.
Lyotard J.F. La condition postmodeme: Rapport sur le savoir. Paris, 1979. P. 7.
Phillips J. Symbol, myth, and rhetoric: The politics of culture in the Armenian American population. AMS Press, 1989. P. 4.

history framing practices, radical constructivism, deconstruction, plurality of truths, language games, interpretation, media virus.