Analysis and evaluation of the legal regulation, de lege lata, concerning the imposition of a custodial sentence in the Slovak Republic
( Pp. 95-114)

In the article, the author dealt with imprisonment as a type of criminal sanction. He pointed out the fact that the said punishment has the status of ultima ratio in the system of punishments in the Slovak Republic and at the same time that this punishment can be considered a universal type of punishment, as it can be imposed for any criminal offense. The author characterized the basic principles of sentencing in general, the substantive conditions of imprisonment contained in the Criminal Code, the various forms of serving this sentence and also pointed out the application problems related to imprisonment, as well as institutes of punishment related to imprisonment. In particular, he addressed aspects that modify custodial sentences, including the issue of concurrence and recidivism. She also characterized the position of imprisonment as an ultima ratio in the context of imposing alternative sentences. To this end, it analyzed the relationship between imprisonment and selected alternative sentences, as well as relevant statistics. She pointed out how imprisonment determines the imposition and specific sentences of house arrest as an alternative sentence. She concluded by considering how the existence of private prisons, which are the place where a custodial sentence is served, could affect the extent to which it is imposed by the courts. In relation to the individual partial issues addressed, he also formulated de lege ferenda proposals.

Simona F.., (2020), ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF THE LEGAL REGULATION, DE LEGE LATA, CONCERNING THE IMPOSITION OF A CUSTODIAL SENTENCE IN THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC. Sociopolitical Sciences, 3 => 95-114.

Biedermanov E. Je v kon trestu odn t svobody v nest tn ch objektech v esk ch podm nk ch re ln Trestn pr vn revue. 2014. No. 5. P. 121.
Burda E., ent J., Koles r J., Z hora J. et al. Trestn z kon: V eobecn as . Koment r. I. diel. first ed., C.H. Beck Praha, 2010.
F bry A. V znenie. Hist ria a s asnos . Ale en k. Plze , 2012.
Ivor J. et al., Trestn pr vo hmotn . V eobecn as . IURA EDITION, Bratislava, 2006.
Ivor J., Pol k P., Z hora J. Trestn pr vo hmotn . V eobecn as 1. IURA EDITION, Bratislava, 2017.
Koles r J. Sankcie v trestnom pr ve. Citicom, Prievidza, 2010.
Mencerov I., Tobi ov L., Turayov Y. et al., Trestn pr vo hmotn . V eobecn as , Heur ka, amor n, 2015.
Mencerov I., Tobi ov L., Turayov Y. et al., Trestn pr vo hmotn . V eobecn as , Heur ka, amor n, 2013.
Micha ov L., Feren kov S. Penologick aspekty. In: Rom a S. et al. Alternat vne sp soby v konu trestov. af rik Press UPJ v Ko iciach, Ko ice, 2018. Pp. 129-137.
Sama O., Stiffel H., Toman P. Trestn z kon. Stru n koment r. IURA EDITION, Bratislava, 2006.
ramel B. Privatiz cia v zensk ho syst mu: no alebo nie Trestn pr vn revue. 2015. No. 2. Pp. 26-33.
trkolec M. V zenstvo Slovenskej republiky - vybran probl my s asnosti a perspekt vy do bud cnosti. In: Trestn politika t tu hist ria, s asnos a perspekt vy. Univerzita Pavla Jozefa af rika v Ko iciach, Ko ice, 2015. Pp. 303-318.
T thov V., Feren kov S., Innovation in Criminal Policy of Imposing Alterantive Sanctions in Slovak Republic, in: Innovations in Science and Education. CBU Research Institute, Prague, Czech Republic, 2019. Pp. 661-670.
Tre kov D., Micha ov L. Ethical aspects and protection of personal data in the execution of the home prison penalty. Vestnik Univerziteta imeni O.E. Kutafina. 2020. No. 2. Pp. 117-129.

sanction, imposition of punishment, imprisonment, prison, Criminal Code.