Humanitarian Knowledge at the Entrepreneurial University: Strategies of «Justification»
( Pp. 164-177)

More about authors
Binkovskaya Larisa N. senior lecturer at the Department of Design of Architectural Environment
Belgorod State Technological University named after V.G. Shukhov
Belgorod, Russian Federation Maltsev Konstantin G. Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Professor; Professor at the Department of Theory and Methodology of Science
Belgorod State Technological University named after V.G. Shukhov
Belgorod, Russian Federation Maltseva Anna V. Cand. Sci. (Polit.); associate professor at the Department of Theory and Methodology of Science
Belgorod State Technological University named after V.G. Shukhov
Belgorod, Russian Federation
Abstract:
Humanitarian knowledge and “liberal education” have been a problem for the modern innovative/entrepreneurial university as a commercial firm for the last fifty years: “impact” as an imperative of the university’s public discourse in liberal democracies and university policy apparently contradicts the statements about the “self-worth” or “uselessness” of humanitarian knowledge. The purpose of the article is to consider the main directions of the “justification” of the “humanitarian component” of the university, the ways of its politicization (the term U. Beck): appeals to values (culture), to the public good, civic education, to the methodological function of philosophy and the humanities, undertaken in this regard. The absence of grounds for the above-mentioned methods of politicization to matter is demonstrated: both in connection with their own inconsistency of such values, and as an argument for the prevailing public discourse of the university. It is concluded that the prevailing liberal interpretation of humanitarian knowledge necessarily provides for its transformation into a product whose price is determined by the market. The actual “problem situation” is not related to the “nature of humanitarian knowledge”, but to the “struggle for status”, that is, it is a question of power and prestige in connection with their redistribution in an entrepreneurial university as a commercial company.
How to Cite:
Binkovskaya L.N., Maltsev K.G., Maltseva A.V., (2022), HUMANITARIAN KNOWLEDGE AT THE ENTREPRENEURIAL UNIVERSITY: STRATEGIES OF «JUSTIFICATION». Sociopolitical Sciences, 2 => 164-177.
Reference list:
Agamben J. Kingdom and glory. To the theological genealogy of economics and management. Moscow; St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the Gaidar Institute; Faculty of Liberal Arts and Sciences of St. Petersburg State University, 2018. 552 p.
Ankersmith F.R. Aesthetic policy. Political philosophy beyond fact and value. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 2014. 432 p.
Alaverdyan A.L., Binkovskaya L.N., Maltsev K.G. “Cultural nation” and “University of Culture”: The experience of interpreting the onto political basis of unity. Society: Politics, Economics, Law. 2021. No. 6 (95). Pp. 13-25. (In Rus.)
Beck U. What is globalization. Moscow: Progress-Tradition, 2001. 304 p.
Binkovskaya L.N., Maltsev K.G. Modern culture as cultural policy: M. Heidegger on culture as a “phenomenon of modernity”. Eurasian Legal Journal. 2021. No. 3 (154). Pp. 464-470. (In Rus.)
Binkovskaya L.N., Maltsev K.G. The strange “death of the university”: The experience of philosophical interpretation. Society: Philosophy, History, Culture. 2021. No. 4 (84). Pp. 21-26. (In Rus.)
Weber M. Basic sociological concepts. In: Weber M. Selected works. Moscow: Progress, 1990. Pp. 602-643.
Grinfeld L. Nationalism. Five paths to modernity. Moscow: PER SE, 2012. 528 p.
Humboldt V. Von. On the internal and external organization of higher scientific institutions in Berlin. University Management: Practice and Analysis. 1998. No. 3 (6). P. 28. (In Rus.)
Debor G. Performance society. Moscow: Logos, 2000. 184 p.
Diltey V. Collected works in 6 volumes. Vol. 1. Introduction to the sciences of the spirit. Moscow: House of Intellectual Books, 2000. 762 p.
Zhdanova I.V., Maltsev K.G. “Self-justification of philosophy”: “Interdisciplinarity” as a way to “integrate” into the “disciplinary structure” of modern science. Intelligence. Innovation. Investment. 2020. No. 5. Pp. 126-133. (In Rus.)
Eagleton T. The slow death of the University. Council of Rectors, 2015. No. 4. Pp. 19-26. (In Rus.)
Kant I. Dispute of faculties. In: Kant I. Essays in 8 volumes. Vol. 7. Moscow: Choro, 1994. Pp. 57-136.
Clark B.R. The creation of entrepreneurial universities: organizational directions of transformation. Moscow: Publishing House of the State University Higher School of Economics, 2011. 240 p.
Collini S. Why are universities needed? Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 2016. 264 p.
Liotar J.-F. The state of postmodernity. Moscow; St. Petersburg: Institute of Experimental Sociology; Aleteya, 1998. 160 p.
Lomako L.L., Maltsev K.G. The Constructivist paradigm in the study of the nation, nationalism, ethno-national conflict: some critical remarks. Eurasian Law Journal. 2020a. No. 8 (147). Pp. 430-434. (In Rus.)
Lomako L.L., Maltsev K.G. Modernist and constructivist ways of conceptualizing the nation and nationalism: Comparative analysis. Socio-Humanitarian Knowledge. 2020b. No. 3. Pp. 273-291. (In Rus.)
Maltsev K.G., Alaverdyan A.L. Modern political philosophy and the “myth of the nation” by K. Hubner. Eurasian Legal Journal. 2020. No. 10 (149). Pp. 472-476. (In Rus.)
Maltsev K.G., Maltseva A.V. “Human capital” as a concept of biopolitics: The experience of philosophical interpretation. Proceedings of the Southwestern State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management. 2020a. Vol. 10. No. 5. Pp. 242-252. (In Rus.)
Maltsev K.G., Maltseva A.V. Digitalization and “digital fetishism”: Foresight in the existential-historical thinking of M. Heidegger. Person. Culture. Education. 2020b. No. 4 (38). Pp. 46-58. (In Rus.)
Nussbaum M. Not for profit: Why democracy needs humanities. Moscow: Publishing House of Higher School of Economics, 2014. 182 p.
Newman J.G. The idea of a university. Minsk: BSU, 2006 208 p.
Reading B. University in ruins. Moscow: Publishing House of the State University Higher School of Economics, 2010. 299 p.
Rikkert G. Boundaries of natural science education of concepts. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 1997. 532 p.
Ritzer J. McDonaldization of society 5. Moscow: Praxis, 2011. 592 p.
Urri J. Mobility. Moscow: Praxis, 2012. 576 p.
Fichte I.G. Speeches to the German nation. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2009. 350 p.
Fukuyama F. The end of history and the last man. Moscow: ACT; Polygraphizdat, 2010. 588 p.
Habermas Yu. Moral consciousness and communicative action. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2001. 382 p.
Heidegger M. Reflections II-VI (Black notebooks 1931-1938). Moscow: Publishing House of the Gaidar Institute, 2016. 584 p.
Heidegger M. Reflections VII-XI (Black notebooks 1938-1939). Moscow: Publishing House of the Gaidar Institute, 2018. 528 p.
Heidegger M. Reflections XII-XV (Black notebooks 1939-1941). Moscow: Publishing House of the Gaidar Institute, 2020. 344 p.
Schmitt K. The spiritual and historical state of modern parliamentarism. In: Schmitt K. The concept of political. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2016a. Pp. 93-170.
Schmitt K. Political theology In: Schmitt K. The concept of the political. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2016b. Pp. 5-59.
Albrow M. The global age: State and society beyond modernity. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1997. 265 p.
Appadurai A. Modernity at large. Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 1996. 244 r.
Featherstone M. Localism, globalizmand cultural. In: Global/local cultural production and the transnational imaginary. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1996. Pp. 46-77.
Frodeman R. Philosophy dedisciplined // Synthese. 2013. Vol. 190. Pp. 1917-1936.
Fuller S. Deviant interdisciplinarity as philosophical practice: Prolegomena to deep intellectual history // Synthese. 2013. Vol. 190 (11). Pp. 1899-1916.
Habermas J . Theory of communicative action. Vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press, 1984. 465 r.
Habermas J . Theory of communicative action. Vol. 2: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Transl. by T.A. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press, 1987. 463 r.
Lasch C. The culture of narcissism: American life in an age of diminishing expectations. New York: Norton, 1979. 296 r.
O Rourke M.. Crowley S.J. Philosophical intervention and cross-disciplinary science: The story of the Toolbox Project // Synthese. 2013. Vol. 190. Pp. 1937-1954.
Robertson R. Globalization: Social theory and global culture. London: SAGE Publication, 1992. 205 r.
Rowls J. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996. 525 r.
Klein J.T. Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1990. 554 p.
Rossini F.A., Porter A.L. Frameworks for integrating interdisciplinary research // Research Policy. 1979. No. 8. Pp. 70-79.
Keywords:
humanitarian knowledge, liberal education, entrepreneurial university, politicization, discourse of excellence, public discourse of the university, human capital.


Related Articles

1. NATIONAL ECONOMY AND MANAGEMENT 08.00.05 Pages: 16-27 Issue №19457
Spatial Distribution of Human Capital in the Regions of Russia: an Assessment of Changes
human capital human development index education index income index longevity index
Show more
5. ECONOMY AND MANAGEMENT OF HIGH-TECH PRODUCTIONS Pages: 198-200 Issue №8496
WAYS OF DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT ON ENTERPRISES RUSSIA SPACE INDUSTRIES
intellectual capital human capital social capital management capital personnel of the organization
Show more
12. ECONOMICS AND NATIONAL ECONOMY MANAGEMENT, ENTREPRENEURSHIP, MARKETING, MANAGEMENT Pages: 141-145 Issue №5518
FOREIGN EXPERIENCE IN HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT ON ENTERPRISES OF HIGH-TECH INDUSTRIES
human capital social capital management capital personnel of the organization human resource management
Show more
14. ECONOMICS AND NATIONAL ECONOMY MANAGEMENT, ENTREPRENEURSHIP, MARKETING, MANAGEMENT Pages: 169-171 Issue №10779
MODERN SPECIFICS OF SOCIAL ORIENTATION OF THE ECONOMY
social orientation human capital economic model budget expenditures
Show more
REGIONAL AND SECTORAL ECONOMICS Pages: 268-273 Issue №24449
Supplementary Reproduction Technologies as a Demographic and Social Development Tool for Russia
human capital total fertility rate (TFR) GDP per capita maternity capital surrogacy
Show more
14. ECONOMICS AND NATIONAL ECONOMY MANAGEMENT, ENTREPRENEURSHIP, MARKETING, MANAGEMENT Pages: 187-190 Issue №10779
CORPORATE HEALTHCENTERED ACTIVITIES AS A FACTOR OF DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN CAPITAL
human capital the reproduction of capital health corporate social responsibility zdorovaemsya activities tobacco control
Show more
5.2.6. MANAGEMENT Pages: 280-287 Issue №20773
New Tools of Anthropogenic Risk Management in the Analysis and Control of Human Capital
human capital health care anthropogenic risks risk management automated system for assessing and forecasting anthropogenic risks (ASOPAR)
Show more
16. INNOVATION AND INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT Pages: 219-222 Issue №4029
INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT IN HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
management innovation development the system of labour human capital
Show more
21. Economic Theory Pages: 246-251 Issue №4894
INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISM OF HUMAN CAPITAL REPRODUCTION
human capital the market mechanism institutional mechanism the principle of individualism celebrational behavior
Show more
5.2.3. REGIONAL AND SECTORAL ECONOMICS Pages: 195-205 Issue №22298
Transformation of Human Capital across Regions of Russia
human capital tertiary education total fertility rate (TFR) GDP per capita correlation
Show more